Sentences with phrase «early decision applications»

In what could be an early indicator of that danger, there's been a 35 percent decline in early decision applications since Cooper Union announced in April that it would charge tuition, according to Slavin.

The most important data I see in helping us to inform our decisions is this: a 35 % decline in Early Decision applications once Cooper announced half - price tuition.

And we know what people think about them apples: a 35 % drop in Early Decision applications.

Early Decision applications are reviewed earlier than Regular Decision applications.

Advice on Early Decisions: This column from a former admissions officer provides advice for students deciding whether to submit a binding early decision application.

An early decision application is available; approximately 60 % of accepted students are early decision applicants.

Not exact matches

For him, this decision to vacate the earlier ruling in spite of the cases at the Supreme Court is «calculated to interfere with, prejudice and also to undermine the outcome of the two applications pending before this Honourable Court.»

Using CETSA data and applications, drug discovery R&D companies are able to make better and more informed decisions at earlier stages in their projects.

First, we get all the historical transaction data and process through the machine learning process like we saw in earlier section, and eventually get a predictive model, that an application could later use to make decisions.

Dorn said the diverse group putting together the state's application made a decision early on to do what is best for Washington.

The proposal, from Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chair Tom Wheeler, provides the most sweeping upgrades since the program's inception and builds on decisions made earlier this year to increase program transparency and streamline the application process.

The Studio Test is sent to all School of Architecture applicants via email on the same day after the online application deadline (December for Early Decision; January for Regular Decision).

The Albert Nerken School of Engineering Writing Supplement consists of a number of short answer questions to be completed within about one week after the application deadline (December 8, 2017 for Early Decision applicants; January 17, 2018 for Regular Decision applicants) and returned to The Cooper Union for review.

At issue this time: prospective students whose early - decision applications have been deferred ahead of the school's vote, next month, about whether or not to begin charging tuition to incoming -LSB-...] The Local East Village

This email outlined that «Pending the Board's decisions in March about the future of the institution, and in the absence of a sustainable model for the School of Art, the Executive Committee of the Board of Trustees has directed the administration to notify students seeking early admission to the School of Art that their applications will be considered as part of the art school's general application pool.»

If admitted via early decision you must accept our offer and withdraw your other college applications.

It is submitted, first, that the test laid down in Ben Nevis, which builds on earlier decisions of the Court of Appeal and Privy Council in Challenge, is a workable exposition of principle but one that will always be problematic in application because of the conceptual difficulties inherent in tax avoidance and its distinction from tax minimisation.

Marshall 2 was a unique institutional response (an extended denial of an application to reconsider «Marshall 1») to an unexpected and unwelcome public reaction to the earlier decision which had been understood (in a way which Marshall 2 said was unjustified) very expansively.

TOMEE SOJOURNER v. CONSEIL DE LA JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE et al Judicial Bias based on Race, Gender, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Nature: Hearing on a Rental Board Judge's application to quash a Superior Court decision rendered in favor of an English - speaking Black lesbian, who had applied for judicial review of an earlier Administrative Judicial Council decision regarding her complaint against the Judge.

In summary, the judgment upholds a Tribunal decision that an application to amend does not engage the early conciliation (EC) provisions but just the usual Selkent principles.

Citing its earlier decision in 2009 - HPA - 0052a, the Board stated its summary dismissal power served a gatekeeper function, intended to «weed out applications that are unworthy of consideration by a panel of the Review Board» [18].

In an earlier post, I discussed the decision of Balev v Bagott, 2016 ONCA 680 (CanLII) and concluded that the ONCA was correct in its strict application of the «prompt return» mechanism of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, 25 October 1980.

For my earlier post on the Federal Court of Appeal's decision in Clyde River see here and for my note on the two leave to appeal applications see here.

Justice Jack Watson reviewed the application, and refused to grant Suncor's application for a stay (see my earlier post on this decision).

Labour law students will look at these earlier decisions as a necessary pre-requisite to understanding the purposive development of s. 2 (d), but for practical applications will hopefully have the luxury of largely ignoring it.

The AIA provides that where a derivation proceeding is instituted and not dismissed, the Board shall issue a written decision that states whether an inventor named in an earlier application derived the claimed invention from an inventor named in the petitioner's application without authorization.

Random drug and alcohol testing for most Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) employees can proceed following a decision of Justice Marrocco denying the ATU Local 113's application for an injunction earlier this week.

In Iggillis Holdings Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue), 2018 FCA 51 (CanLII), a highly anticipated decision released earlier this month, the Federal Court of Appeal overturned a Federal Court decision which found that common interest privilege «is not a legitimate or acceptable application of solicitor - client privilege».

The background to the case is complicated, with multiple Federal Court decisions handed down since the application was made in early 1994.