Not exact matches
Although we know that the
magnetic field originates in different parts of
Earth and that each source generates magnetism of different
strengths, exactly how it is generated and why it changes is not fully understood.
In order to put these relatively recent changes into historical perspective, Rochester researchers — led by John Tarduno, a professor and chair of EES — gathered data from sites in southern Africa, which is within the South Atlantic Anomaly, to compile a record of
Earth's
magnetic field
strength over many centuries.
Pulsars, according to conventional theory, are neutron stars with immense
magnetic fields — about a trillion times the
strength of
Earth's — that funnel hydrogen pulled from their red - giant neighbor continuously down onto their
magnetic poles.
Ever since scientists generated the first global model of
Earth's
magnetic field nearly 180 years ago, its
strength has decreased by some 10 percent.
In some cases, they estimated, it could reach a thousand trillion times the
strength of
Earth's
magnetic field.
The sensor detected digitally modulated
magnetic field signals with
strengths of 1 picotesla (one millionth of the
Earth's
magnetic field
strength) and at very low frequencies, below 1 kilohertz (kHz).
Magnetic fields of different
strengths make those electrons spiral in particular ways, and that spiraling changes the orientation of the light as it travels toward
Earth.
Earth's dipole
magnetic field
strength has decreased 16 percent since 1840 — with most of the decay related to the weakening field in the South Atlantic Anomaly — leading to much speculation that the planet is in the early stages of a field reversal.
Both recent storms weakened
Earth's
magnetic field after just minutes, according to solar readings from satellites and
magnetic strength readings from ground sensors.
Those threads indicate the presence of a
magnetic field — 1/10, 000 the
strength of
Earth's, but huge — that holds the structure together.
Astronomers already knew that Mercury has a
magnetic field about 1 per cent the
strength of
Earth's, and that the rotation of liquid iron in the core generates the field, just as happens inside
Earth.
Mercury has a
magnetic field about 1 per cent the
strength of
Earth's.
These signals indicate the
strength and direction of
Earth's
magnetic field when the crystals formed.
(The largest of them measured 30 nanoteslas, which is about 1/100, 000 th the typical
strength of the planet's
magnetic field measured at
Earth's surface.)
To make the map they used the known
strength and direction of the
Earth's
magnetic field everywhere within the planet's mantle and crust.
Globally,
Earth's
magnetic field has declined in
strength by 10 % since the 19th century with changes accelerating in recent years, according to measurements by Europe's SWARM satellites.
Researchers found that the intensity of the
Earth's
magnetic field five million years ago was just 60 percent of its
strength today.
This is because the
earth's
magnetic field varies in
strength and polarity direction.
It is suprising that no papers (that I KNOW of, correct me if I'm wrong) came out regarding CME direct hits of Mercury and Venus while spacecraft were in orbit around these planets.I assume this is because neither planet has a
magnetic field, and the
strength of such CME's can be INFERRED from hypothetically equivalent hitting
Earth's
magnetic field.
The
strength of the sun's
magnetic field is typically only about twice as strong as
Earth's field.
The plasma in the interplanetary medium is also responsible for the
strength of the Sun's
magnetic field at the orbit of the
Earth.
According to the skeptics, the solar irradiance isn't very important, it is the
strength of the sun's
magnetic field (that allows or stops cosmic rays from coming in which then causes more or less clouds, which increases or decreases the
Earth's albedo, which then causes warming or cooling of the
Earth's surface).
Is there any correlation between the flipping of
Earth's
magnetic polarity, with its corresponding weakening of the field's
strength, and global climate?
Because of their speed, their large
magnetic field
strength, and their often long - lived and strong southward
magnetic field component, many fast CMEs are highly geoeffective; that is, energy is transferred effectively between the solar wind and
Earth's magnetosphere through the process of
magnetic...
Strength of the Earth's magnetosphere is directly proportional to the strength of the Earth's magnetic field at any time scale from days to months years, solar cycles or Hale cycles periods, centuries, mil
Strength of the
Earth's magnetosphere is directly proportional to the
strength of the Earth's magnetic field at any time scale from days to months years, solar cycles or Hale cycles periods, centuries, mil
strength of the
Earth's
magnetic field at any time scale from days to months years, solar cycles or Hale cycles periods, centuries, millennia..
This is the area where the
Earth's
magnetic forces are generated,
strength of field is estimated to be about 25 Gauss, about 50 times greater than that on the
Earth's surface.
The
Earth's field sustains the magnetosphere and it is not constant either, it shows similar decadal variability, as shown in the data from and used by number of distinguished geo -
magnetic scientists and researchers (Jault Gire, LeMouel, J. Bloxham, D. Gubbins, A.Jackson, R. Hide, D. Boggs, J. Dickey etc,) Since changes in either of two fields affect
strength of the magnetosphere, it would be expected that the «magnetospheric variability» time function could be produced by combining two sets of available data.
Renown solar scientist Dr. K.G. McCracken from the Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, in 2007 published paper: Changes in the cosmic ray and heliomagnetic components of space climate, 1428 — 2005, including the variable occurrence of solar energetic particle events McCracken 2007 paper Major result of McCracken investigation based on 10Be dating is: the estimated annual average heliospheric
magnetic field
strength near
Earth, 1428 — 2005, based on the inter-calibrated cosmic ray record as shown in Fig. 2 on p. 1073 (4 of 8).
How about this one:
earth's core is molten iron -
magnetic north can move around and invert according to the fossil record - the
earths magnetism gives us the magnetosphere in the same way the sun's magnetism gives us the heliosphere - if the sun's electromagnet had a 11 year periodicity - some kind of resonance - then its
magnetic strength could wax and wane - even better - it could be connected to Jupiter's
magnetic field properties.
The most likely candidate for that climatic variable force that comes to mind is solar variability (because I can think of no other force that can change or reverse in a different trend often enough, and quick enough to account for the historical climatic record) and the primary and secondary effects associated with this solar variability which I feel are a significant player in glacial / inter-glacial cycles, counter climatic trends when taken into consideration with these factors which are, land / ocean arrangements, mean land elevation, mean
magnetic field
strength of the
earth (
magnetic excursions), the mean state of the climate (average global temperature), the initial state of the
earth's climate (how close to interglacial - glacial threshold condition it is) the state of random terrestrial (violent volcanic eruption, or a random atmospheric circulation / oceanic pattern that feeds upon itself possibly) / extra terrestrial events (super-nova in vicinity of
earth or a random impact) along with Milankovitch Cycles.
The amount of cosmic radiation reaching the
Earth is controlled by the
strength of the Sun's
magnetic field.
The
strength of the magnetosphere is regulated by the sun (whose activity changes in synchrony with the planets), but perhaps the
strength of the
Earth's magnetosphere is also regulated directly by the gravitational /
magnetic forces of Jupiter and Saturn and the other planets whose gravitational /
magnetic tides may stretch or compress the
Earth's magnetosphere in some way making it easier or more difficult for the
Earth's magnetosphere to deviate the cosmic ray.