Earths life support systems are the immediate critical big picture and rt4 is a big step to helping these most import life support system out.
Not exact matches
If
Earth isn't the only planet capable of
supporting life, and there are definitely no aliens out there, then something grim is going on.
Be it in the form of solar system
supporting life on planet
earth or in the works of a scientist who is researching, Creativity a force, a constance presence is eternally at work.
I understand your article Kerry and how family can be and should be a
support in birth, in
living and in death, however so many people on this
earth do not get to experience that... so many times families are torn apart or kids are abandoned and marriages ruined by one thing or another, so we must realize who gave us
life, what purpose he gave us
life for!
(that bright fellow Aristotle was a Geo - Centrist... he got that wrong and undoubtedly had his own bucket of
supporting evidence — I wonder how many people looked to him as an authority on the subject and
lived their
lives believing the sun rotated around the
earth?)
Thus, for instance, the self - conscious freedom of human activity is made possible by the extremely complex order that it is privileged to appropriate, including the conditions which
support life on this
earth and the complexity of the human body.
Earth is at the right distance from the sun with the right gravity to
support life conditions (habitualness.)
If the work of creation is seen as an evolutionary process, then existence of matter is the necessary precondition for the appearance, on
earth, of spirit: elsewhere Pere Teilhard de Chardin speaks of matter in more exact language as the «matrix of spirit»: that in which
life emerges and is
supported, not the active principle from which it takes its rise.
Earth itself would not
support most of the
life on this planet... enter the cytoplasm, which over many million years, slowly changed the atmosphere into one that was oxygen rich.
Earth is at the right distance from the Sun with the right gravity to
support life conditions — habitualness.
Mother
Earth and the
life supporting system are abused and adulterated.
The «international body for the Sustainability of Human
Life on the
Earth» requires «the independence and power to facilitate agreement between all societal actors to
support the protection of the Biosphere as the Common Interest of Humanity.»
The sun is not perfectly positioned upon the
earth by accident it was placed there for a reason and purpose to
support life which is God attended... We are not on this planet on accident we did not evolve from a single cell that theory has been debunked for many years...
if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent
support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough
support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on
earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough
support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on
earth, you might be an atheist if you
live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.
Please rationally explain why the
Earth is the exact distance it must be from the sun to
support life, why the moon is the exact distance from the
Earth to sustain
life, why the bacterial flagella is so genius, why the energy in a universe «moving toward order» is a finite, why we all have a moral intuition and why «relativism» is self - destructive, how something scientifically came from virtually nothing, why love is self - sacrificing, why procreation is enjoyable instead of painful, why man is eternally unsatisfied.
All to ready as well to ignore the massive chances necessary to
support their theories, which would make it more likely for me to find every different brand of cola in rivers rather then the
life they suppose to have simply sprung from the
earth and evolved to what it is today.
Its a fact also the molecular evidence
supports Darwin — there is no debate — evolution is the best mechanism that explains the diversity of
life on
earth.
Matthew Henry commented «The righteous are as trees of
life; and their influence upon
earth, like the fruits of that tree,
support and nourish the spiritual
life in many.»
-LCB- Editor, see Michael Flynn's article in this issue) The book also gives little consideration to the damage our modern industrial system may be doing to the capacity of the
earth itself to
support life.
He proposes a more balanced reflection on the significance for
life on
earth of the forces involved in disasters and on what we can do to protect and
support people facing such disasters.
And what about how the
earth can
support life and contains tall of the natural resources to assure humanites survival is this fact also a random occurance?
Then there is the «theological»
support for an inflated military budget, weapons development, even destruction of
life on
earth.
fishon — I once heard any interesting mathematical exercise on the likelihood of
earth supporting life.
To take one more of many possible examples, the possibilities for
supporting life on the
earth are limited, and our successes in reducing death rates are contributing to the specter raised by what is generally called the «population explosion.»
Perhaps by demonstrating greater love and care to those around us, particularly those within our own family and especially those who are unwell or marginalised within society; by reaching out to those who are struggling in
life, in need of comfort or
support — and by valuing them all as human beings — then we can all indeed be true disciples of Christ on
earth.
As Christians, our motive for
earth care is the Holy Spirit's prayer and restorative work on behalf of the
earth that
supports us, the air we breathe, the water essential for
life.
But it does seem clear to me that we need to begin with a vision of a world community (1) consisting of a population within the biological carrying capacity of the planet (2) organized politically and economically in ways that provide to all human beings equal access to the means of material fulfillment and (3) organized technologically in ways that (4) neither exhaust essential natural resources of
earth nor (5) upset the delicate balances of nature which make the environment capable of
supporting life.
We don't know what an «old
earth» looks like, as we have never found another planet that
supports life that we can compare to.
This personal savior orientation has led to an interpersonal devotionalism that quite easily dispenses with
earth except as a convenient
support for
life.
The odds of there being another
earth - like planet that could
support life are getting larger and larger the more we discover, chief!
It would also destroy the
life -
support systems of the
earth (Ehrlich & Sagan 1984).
This was not only because of the enormous amount of resources that the military in all countries were using up but also the ultimate threat of a nuclear war that might, in one stroke, destroy the
life -
support systems of the
earth.
But, as well,
living organisms play a vital part in maintaining the
life -
support systems of the
earth.
«The next fifty years will be crucial to our planet's future,» says Bill McKibben, because they «could so devastate the
earth's biology [sic] that it will never again be able to
support life as abundantly as it does at present.»
Support by citizens of such action as will lift the
living standards and the human dignity of the millions of underprivileged, nonwhite peoples of the
earth is imperative.
For the first time in the history of creation, the
life support systems of the Planet
Earth are being destroyed by human activities... Throughout history humans have caused locally significant damage to the environment, but never before have human numbers and actions combined to threaten the integrity of the entire planet.
They adopted these beliefs through peer pressure and maintained them through a vast
support group that revolves around promising unearthly rewards in the after
life for believing them, while convincing people that paradise can not exist on this
earth because of these beliefs.
We are devoted to sustainable
living and through our community we
support the organic and
living foods movement, the
Earth and her forests.
Great Reception???, tell you the truth Im not one of those gunners who started
supporting the gunners during the invicibles or early Wenger double winning years, quite honestly i wasnt ineterested in football and I liked a certain Crespo and Shevchenko meaning I liked the blue half of London, surprisingly when Mourinho joined I stopped watching football all together, till one glorious Champions League Night, It was my first ever Match there was a certain 20 year old highly rated youngster who scored a wonder goal that day he played with such skill and passion ever since then I started
supporting arsenal that was during the barren years.I actually liked Barcelona because of their similarity with the arsenal, so when Fabregas joined Barca I started to watch them a bit more I still loved Arsenal and I was extremely passionate, the other players i adored left in painful manners, while some left which was still painful: i.e Eboue.I always taught cesc would come back and when it was official he was leaving Barca i said Finally almost hosting a party.Well reports started coming out that he is going to join chelsea and i laughed so hard and said he would be the last player on
earth to do that, when it became official words cant express how i felt, He was the reason I started watching football he lit up the emirates with exquisite touches through balls to walcott, its a shame I would have preferred he joined bayern, or remained in barca its terrible reading the comments he made recently about the emirates, This was a captain, someone who led, anyways, like ive learnt and Arsenal have learnt, We do nt
live in the past Like Liverpool (no pun) WE ARE THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE (Crowley)(Puma) WE ARE ARSENAL.....
ANNOUNCER: Funding for
Living on
Earth comes from the National Science Foundation,
supporting coverage of emerging science.
ANNOUNCER:
Support for
Living on
Earth comes from the National Science Foundation and Stonyfield Farm.
Though shalt
support the narrative that your son fell to
Earth from the heavens above and has no
living parents to speak of (with the caveat that thou shalt miraculously appear when your child needs money... and then quickly dissipate into oblivion once more).
We design our programs to
support the Massachusetts Department of Education
Life and
Earth Science, Technology and Engineering, History, and / or Geography frameworks.
Ford, Judy WONDERFUL WAYS TO LOVE A CHILD Conari, 1995 This collection of brief, warm essays
supports loving guidance and offers down - to -
earth ideas for expressing love for your child as a part of everyday
life.
Following the maxim of keeping everything as simple as possible, but not simpler, Will Steffen from the Australian National University and I drew up an Anthropocene equation by homing in on the rate of change of
Earth's
life support system: the atmosphere, oceans, forests and wetlands, waterways and ice sheets and fabulous diversity of
life.
The survey also found that 43 percent of evangelicals
supported a strong creationist view in which «God created the
Earth, the universe and all
life within the past 10,000 years.»
The program brings together researchers from
Earth science, planetary science, heliophysics and astrophysics, to pursue specific goals that
support the larger pursuit of looking for alien
life.
The vial's contents would
support a new account of how
life began on
Earth and would arouse both surprise and skepticism around the world.
But
Earth could still
support life even if it were as far from the sun as Saturn, claim two scientists in the US, as long as the air abounded with hydrogen.
Many planets outside the solar system are even more massive than Jupiter, and they orbit their Sun - like stars at an
Earth - like distance, but these faraway super-Jupiters are effectively giant gas balls that can not
support life because they lack solid surfaces.