He is
Editor of the journal Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law (RECIEL), Associate Editor of the Carbon & Climate Law Review (CCLR), and sits on the Editorial Board of International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
The editor of the journal reviews the article, and sends copies to three scientists who are experts in the field.
Not exact matches
Pushing back against «political correctness,» in 1987, Thiel co-founded the Stanford
Review, a
journal of conservative and libertarian viewpoints, and was its first
editor - in - chief.
The teacher: Steven Heller writes the Visuals column for the New York Times Book
Review and is the
editor of the AIGA
Journal of Graphic Design.
With year's end drawing near the
editors of the Wall Street
Journal «s weekend
review section asked fifty «friends» to tell us their favorite books
of 2012.
Allen G. Weakland, the former
editor of The New American
Review: A
Journal of Civility and the Arts, is co-author
of The Private Albert Einstein.
I also wish to thank the
editors of Judaism, The
Journal of Bible and Religion, The
Review of Religion, The
Journal of Religion, and The
Review of Metaphysics for permission to use materials from articles published in those
journals.
The decisions
of journal editors, committees
reviewing applications for grants, and administrators making appointments, all serve as informal ways
of planning.
As
editor of the American Ecclesiastical
Review during its mid-century heyday, he guided one
of the more influential theological
journal in English.
Professor Baxt published widely and was the founder and general
editor of the Australian Business Law
Review and the Company and Securities Law
Journal.
She has authored or co-authored over 70 peer
reviewed articles, and chapters in both national and international books on assessment and treatment
of young children, and is currently an Associate
editor of the Infant Mental Health
Journal.
She served as
editor - in - chief
of «Nexus
Journal of Literature and Art» and as an assistant fiction
editor at the prestigious «Antioch
Review.»
Program Ph.D. (Clinical Psychology), University
of Pittsburgh, 1986
Editor in Chief,
Journal of Anxiety Disorders Member, Board
of Directors, Council
of University Directors
of Clinical Psychology (CUDCP) Member, NIMH Institutional
Review Group, Children and Families Intervention Group
She serves on the Board
of Directors
of the Selective Mutism Association and is Associate
Editor of the peer -
reviewed journal Evidence - Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health.
Mohammad I. Aslam is a Ph.D candidate in Political Science at the Department
of Middle - East & Mediterranean Studies, King's College London, and a former
Editor at the Montreal
Review Journal.
She is the Managing
Editor of the St. Antony's International
Review (STAIR), Oxford University's
journal of international affairs.
He is the
Editor - in - Chief
of the peer -
reviewed journal Contemporary Security Policy.
10.30 am Science and Technology Subject: Clinical trials Witness (es): Professor Sir Michael Rawlins, Chair
of Medical Sciences Regulation and Governance
Review, Dr Keith Bragman, President, The Faculty
of Pharmaceutical Medicine and Dr Fiona Godlee,
Editor in chief, British Medical
Journal Location: The Thatcher Room, Portcullis House
His subsequent publishing career has included positions as founding
editor of the international monthly
review journal, Trends in Ecology & Evolution from 1986 until 1999.
Shortly after I reached this new state
of self - awareness, I took a position as acting managing
editor with an online, peer -
reviewed scientific
journal called Conservation Ecology.
The
editors in some
journals rank the
reviews themselves by the quality
of their scholarship.
Wager's team compared
editor - chosen and author - suggested
reviews submitted to 40
of BioMed Central's
journals.
That is why the
editor of The
Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry was puzzled by the
reviews for manuscripts by one author — Hyung - In Moon, a medicinal - plant researcher then at Dongguk University in Gyeongju, South Korea.
In at least one case, the authors
of a retracted article claim they didn't use an agency and did not propose fake reviewers — which suggests the
journal's
editors invited the fake
review instead.
The effort did not go to waste: the publication describing the achievement was distinguished by the
editors of the
journal Physical
Review Letters.
The event initiated a dialogue on the topic in the community
of peer -
reviewed journal editors and led to guidelines on dealing with ghostwritten articles that are now embraced by many — though not all — scientific
journals.
1 In this article, current and former
editors of bioscience
journals comment on the editorial
review process, describe how
editors and reviewers are chosen, and offer concrete suggestions on how to get involved in editorial
review.
DeWitt was the acting
editor for a section
of the July 1957 issue
of Reviews of Modern Physics containing proceedings from a physics conference that he and I had organized in January
of that year (he was not the regular
editor of the
journal).
For the stances he has taken, Duesberg has faced such ferocious personal and professional attacks that in 1996 Richard Horton,
editor of the British medical
journal The Lancet and himself a critic
of Duesberg, broke ranks and wrote in The New York
Review of Books: «Duesberg deserves to be heard, and the ideological assassination that he has undergone will remain an embarrassing testament to the reactionary tendencies
of modern science.
Carol Barnes, professor
of psychology and neurology at the University
of Arizona in Tucson, is a
reviewing editor at the
Journal of Neuroscience, a 3 - year appointment for which she receives no compensation.
Allison Lang is managing
editor for Immunology, one
of the monthly peer -
reviewed journals of the British Society for Immunology.
Editors at the second
journal may use the information gathered during evaluation at Science Robotics to expedite
review, including reuse
of the
reviews, provided reviewers agree.
Dr. Bot is the
editor - in - chief
of International
Reviews of Immunology and the section
editor for immunology and immunotherapy for the
Journal of Translational Medicine.
At Conservation Biology, which switched to double - blind
reviews in 2014, reviewers who make a guess get it right about half
of the time, says the
journal's
editor, Mark Burgman
of Imperial College London.
«This
review presents one
of the most detailed treatises to date
of organic versus conventional milk composition,» commented Matt Lucy, PhD, Professor
of Animal Science, University
of Missouri, and
Editor - in - Chief
of the
Journal of Dairy Science ®.
The
editor - in - chief
of the European
Journal of Chemistry, Hakan Arslan, a professor
of chemistry at Mersin University in Turkey, does not see this as a failure
of peer
review but rather a breakdown in trust.
A breakthrough into the full characterisation
of quantum states has been published today as a
Editors» Suggestion in the
journal Physical
Review Letters.
With a tweet yesterday, an
editor of Scientific Reports, one
of Nature Publishing Group's (NPG's) open - access
journals, has resigned in a very public protest
of NPG's recent decision to allow authors to pay money to expedite peer
review of their submitted papers.
At least once each year the Board will
review the state
of the
journal and will receive a comprehensive report from the
Editor - in - Chief, including the views
of the Editorial Board.
She has acted as an associate
editor for PLoS Computational Biology, as an associate member
of Faculty1000, and has published widely in international peer -
reviewed journals.
In addition to having over 150 peer -
reviewed publications, Dr. Højgaard has also acted as both assistant
editor (1991 - 1996) and
editor - in - chief (1996 - 2002)
of The Danish Medical
Journal.
Held on Saturday 20 February from 11 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. in the San Diego Marriott Hotel Marina Ballroom G, the Science
editor will explore the manuscript submission procedure including the
review, approval, and publication process, and describe what kind
of submissions best suited for a specialty
journal.
Dr. Palop is a
reviewing editor of eNeuro, the open access online
journal of the Society
of Neuroscience.
Bernd Pulverer, chief
editor of The EMBO
Journal, reflected on two years
of the
Journal's policy
of transparent peer
review in an article for the November 4th issue
of Nature (468, 29 - 31).
Our clients include, amongst others, Chief Scientific Advisers; senior EU scientific officials; representatives
of national governments, academies and agencies; prominent business leaders; stakeholders from pan-European scientific organisations and membership groups; science media and senior
editors from peer -
reviewed journals; and various talking - heads from internationally renowned research facilities.
Personal information A member
of the WHEAT Independent Steering Committee since 2014, Porter has published more than 140 papers in
reviewed journals, won four international prizes for research and teaching, and served as president
of the European Society for Agronomy and was Chief
Editor of the European
Journal of Agronomy for many years.
The EMBO
Journal's policy was held up as a model for a reformed peer
review process by the 14 senior scientists, including 6 members
of the EuroSyStem Project, who criticised the existing peer
review process in an open letter to senior
editors of peer -
reviewed journals in the field
of stem cell biology in June 2009.
The letter, which was sent to senior
editors of 10 key
journals, calls for improved transparency in the peer
review process.
I am greatly honored to be appointed as the inaugural
Editor - in - Chief
of Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research (CMMR), an international, open access, and peer -
reviewed journal.
The
editors of JLR will pay close attention to the Spotlight Talks, as the
journal is just wrapping up an eight -
review series on the major risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, apolipoprotein E, and it's time to get inspired for the next one.