Sentences with phrase «education reformers believe»

Education reformers believe that performance evaluations are the key to improving educational achievement, and those who fail to receive good performance evaluations should lose their jobs.

Education reformers believe that concepts like evaluations and standards should apply to everyone but themselves.

As a public policy matter, education reformers believe public money should follow children to schools of their parents» choice.

Education reformers believe that schools improve if they are forced to compete.

Education reformers believe that teachers will produce higher test scores if they are «incentivized» by merit pay.

And unlike the vast majority of charters, the Partnership has to contend with a teachers» union, which many education reformers believe is anathema to the notion of innovative schooling.

On that day in 2014, with the governor's explicit blessing, education reformers believed they were close to fulfilling a decade - long quest to establish New York as a national model for education reform.

Not exact matches

Believing he was among friends, UFT boss Mike Mulgrew showed what he's really made of during a closed - door meeting with union activists — spewing hatred toward education «reformers» and charter schools, and even admitting he sabotaged teacher evaluations.

Believing he was among friends, UFT boss Mike Mulgrew showed what he's really made of during a closed - door meeting with union activists — spewing hatred toward education «reformers» and charter...

«I know this is an enormous leap, but I believe there's a yearning for a strong manager who's an education reformer,» Allon, of the Upper West Side, told the paper.

The Republican governor, Charlie Crist, supported the board's decision, prompting education reformers to lament the loss of Jeb Bush, who they believed would not have been so submissive.

Bernard Lacour, a longtime school reformer who works with local school councils and consults with New Leaders on placement issues, believes that the obstacles thrown up by council dynamics and the predisposition for experience may be exacerbated by system politics, the advantages of incumbency, and fear among local councils that their candidates will be challenged by the board of education and their authority taken away from them.

We believe that the market based reformers are practicing a kind of crude social Darwinism — treating education as a commodity to be bought and sold, creating a hierarchy of winners (the elite who get a rich curriculum of questioning) and losers (the oppressed classes, the Black and Brown and immigrant and low - income children who need to be taught passivity and compliance).

Liberal education reformers, unlike their critics on the left, believe charter schools play an important role, and also generally believe that all schools need to have more ability to reward excellent teachers and fire low - performing ones.

Liberal education reformers also believe that the market alone is not enough to ensure charter school quality, and that charter schools need strong oversight boards, which can close down poor - performing charters.

Just as I reached the conclusion that urban districts can't be fixed and, therefore, we need to create a new delivery system for public education in America's cities, a large and growing number of reformers interested in teacher preparation believe that we can't trust the old system to change adequately and that, instead, we need to create new pathways into the profession.

But then, despite facing a budget shortfall and laying off dozens of teachers, School Superintendent Paul «education reformer extraordinaire» Vallas, announced that he was instituting yet another full round of standardized tests in June because he believes that more testing is the only way to prevent teachers from allowing a «lull» in learning to take place in their classrooms.

Education reformers in the early twenty - first century believe that school quality and teacher quality may best be measured by test scores.

Reformers believe that if teachers are subjected to «market forces,» such as merit pay and job insecurity, they will work harder to improve the education they provide for their students.

How Music Got Free: The End of an Industry, the Turn of the Century, and the Patient Zero of Piracy: Be they school choice advocates or activists for revamping teacher quality or even standards and accountability proponents, many reformers have a tendency to believe that their favored solution will transform American public education.

Although some education reformers who support vouchers can be quick to create a false narrative around the reasons why, it is true that many of us, including myself, believe that school choice should be public school choice.

That will include an advisory council of 29 education reformers (full list below) shouting about the principles they believe improve outcomes for pupils, including at events, and in national and local press.

The 43 - year - old lawyer, education reformer, community organizer and father of two has taken on a huge job, mobilizing parents in Los Angeles to help them transform consistently failing schools that he believes are not serving children.

Jersey Jazzman deserves a lot of credit for successively laying out the fundamental difference between the «education reformers» and those of us who believe in the sanctity of public education.

The diverse array of school reformers that believes public education is broken beyond repair have created a shopping list of reforms / solutions that includes the following concepts: charter schools, vouchers, data - based decision making, high - stakes testing, parental choice, merit pay, eliminating tenure, union busting, and Common Core standards.

Those data sets powerfully raise the question that «reformers» are so desperate to avoid: Are we really expected to believe that it's just a coincidence that the public education and poverty crises are happening at the same time?

If so, you didn't miss much — except a revealing glimpse into the Hollywood - style fantasies of education reformers who believe they have found a new panacea for saving public education: parent - trigger laws.

Just as Bernie Sanders believes that the middle class in our country is in jeopardy from the oligarchs, likewise oligarchs such as Bill Gates, Bill Walton, Michael Bloomberg, to name a few of the corporate education oligarch reformers, are threatening to change and destroy public education in the nation by replacing public schools with charter schools.

But what the education reformers and political elite failed to understand was that Bridgeport voters, like all Connecticut voters, believe in public schools, believe in our school teachers and believe in the unalienable right of self - governance.

As a nationally recognized corporate education reformer, Commissioner Pryor's language is designed to play to his corporate education reform allies, not teachers or those who believe in the important of unions and collective bargaining.

«We believe that corporate school reformers are once again turning to Hollywood to sell a version of school reform that many parents reject, as they did with «Waiting for Superman» and its biased attack on public school teachers and idealization of charter schools,» said Julie Woestehoff, PAA co-founder and executive director of Chicago's Parents United for Responsible Education.

These education reformers really seem to believe that the problem facing urban schools is not primarily the level of poverty, language barriers or the significant number of students who require special education services, but the «quality» of the teachers.

The charlatans can smell the easy money; they readily understand that it is just a matter of playing out a role — you only have to say that you believe in «choice for all children» and that «bad teachers» are the problem, and that charter schools are pathways to success, and, in good time, the public money will come rolling in, as Stefan Pryor and his gang of reformers at the State Department of Education are only too happy to fund private initiatives, just so long as the required rhetoric.

I've also been critical of «school reformers» who try to hijack Social Emotional Learning to further objectives that I don't believe are helpful to our schools (see my Washington Post piece, Why schools should not grade character traits, and New Research Shows Why Social Emotional Learning (SEL) and Character Education Are Not Enough.