Not exact matches
In the same tone as the last post regarding atmospheric contaminants, have to wonder whether an era
of widespread constant combustion across the globe, and all the
waste heat from that combustion, would have any
effect on the global mean temperature.
The Urban
Heat Island Effect (UHI) is a phenomenon whereby the concentration of structures and waste heat from human activity (most notably air conditioners and internal combustion engines) results in a slightly warmer envelope of air over urbanised areas when compared to surrounding rural ar
Heat Island
Effect (UHI) is a phenomenon whereby the concentration
of structures and
waste heat from human activity (most notably air conditioners and internal combustion engines) results in a slightly warmer envelope of air over urbanised areas when compared to surrounding rural ar
heat from human activity (most notably air conditioners and internal combustion engines) results in a slightly warmer envelope
of air over urbanised areas when compared to surrounding rural areas.
Because our excess
heat is concentrated in what amounts to point sources, and those point sources are almost invariably located near to the temperature monitoring sites, you may want be a little kinder to Phillip and his opinion that
waste heat accounts for a significant amount
of our «warming» unless you have convincing evidence that the
heat is dissipated so rapidly that its net
effect is smaller than our ability to detect.
It has long been observed that temperatures in cities are higher than in the surrounding countryside, caused, in part, by human structures that reduce albedo and evapo - transpiration, as well as by the
effects of waste heat emissions, McCarthy et al 2010.
There is just the
effect of CO2 on radiative absorption, the
effect of land use changes on albedo, and perhaps
waste heat itself if you value completeness.