A, Final Update on Coalition
Election Policy Commitments, (Media Release), 5 September 2013.
Not exact matches
One thing we do know from recent
policy announcements, Conservatives will live up to their
election commitments no matter how bad they are as
policy commitments.
But while the Conservative manifesto explicitly states the
policy would be kept until 2020, increasing talk of an early general
election calls into question whether it will remain a
commitment for as long as many will have expected.
The leader of the biggest opposition party also made a firm
commitment to introduce a regime that will implement a
policy for the
election of District Chief Executives (DCEs) explaining that: «The time has come to bring accountability to local government through competitive politics.
The Labour Party campaigned in the 1983 general
election on a
commitment to withdraw from the EC without a referendum [29] although after a heavy defeat Labour changed its
policy.
He also cited the coalition's plans to introduce a marriage allowance — a key Tory
commitment which Clegg had dismissed as «patronising» prior to the general
election — suggesting voters now saw the Lib Dems as «people who are giving power to the Conservatives without any influence over
policies they used to oppose».
The
policy seemed to break a 2015 Tory
election manifesto
commitment not to raise taxes - including NICs - for at least five years.
«The Tories fended off attacks on their plans to give married couples a tax break as political parties engaged in angry clashes over family
policy... Mr Cameron renewed his
commitment to the
policy, saying he wanted to send out a message that «If you take responsibility, you'll be rewarded»... As family
policy took centre stage in pre general -
election skirmishes, Mr Cameron said supporting marriage was an important part of his plans to tackle Britain's «broken society».
Add to this the
commitment by the opposition party to deny the President any (more) political victories in this year of mid-term Congressional
elections, and the possibility of progressive climate
policy action appears unlikely in the short term.
At their best,
election platforms and
policies are aspirational — their translation from fine words on paper to development, funding and implementation is a long journey that requires leadership and
commitment.