Sentences with phrase «election spending per»

Election spending per candidate is already capped at election time.

Not exact matches

Two months before the presidential election of 2000, the PNAC unipolarists issued a position paper titled «Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century» that spelled out the particulars of a global empire strategy: repudiate the ABM treaty, build a global missile defense system, increase defense spending by $ 20 billion per year to 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, and reinvent the U.S. military to meet expanded obligations throughout the world.

If you're a small campaign with a single staffer, try to spend at least 8 hours planning and executing your online - specific strategy per week, particularly at the beginning, remembering that those early hours can be far more valuable than time spent right before the election.

If you're a small campaign with a single staffer, try to spend 4 - 8 hours planning and executing your online - specific strategy per week, at least at the beginning, remembering that those early hours can be far more valuable than time spent right before the election.

With the exception of Papua New Guinea ($ 63), Kenya tops all, out spending the United States, United Kingdom, Brazil and Uganda per voter average in recent elections.

Putting that in context — Rwanda spent 5.5 billion Rwandan francs ($ 6.5 million) to conduct its August 4 third multiparty election which had 6.8 million registered voters thus less than a dollar per voter.

The 2016 elections in Ghana, where 15.7 million were registered, cost $ 12 per voter, while Tanzania, a country with a bigger population and more voters than Kenya, spent $ 300 million less on its 2015 elections.

In our analysis of 100 years of fiscal squeezes in the UK, we found that hard revenue or spending squeezes were associated with a 77 to 86 per cent likelihood of the incumbent parties in government losing at the next general election, compared with the 38 to 42 per cent likelihood of losing the next election that was associated with soft revenue and spending squeezes.

We have to wait for the spending review, after the conclusion of Labour's leadership election, to find out about the 80 per cent spending cuts.

Say there was a law that limited how much a presidential candidate could spend during the election process per month all / most of the campaign money isn't used (According to this article there isn't...

Conservatives will be free to change spending priorities within the fixed budget: «Adopting these 2 per cent a year spending plans has implications for the manifesto that we will offer the country at the next election.

«And imagine what the reaction would've been if the city had to spend millions of dollars to hold a runoff election for one of the small parties, where they might've been spending as much as $ 30,000 per vote in order to administer a runoff election for one of the smaller parties.

[16] The election saw the first cap on spending by parties in individual constituencies during the 100 days before Parliament's dissolution on 30 March: # 30,700, plus a per - voter allowance of 9p in county constituencies and 6p in borough seats.

In addition to this issue with the national campaign, an analysis of the local, constituency - based campaigns at the 2010 election was carried out by the Electoral Reform Society in 2013, finding that the difference in expenditure was 22 times as high in the constituency with the highest campaign spend per vote as it was in the lowest.

72 per cent of British adults believe Ed Miliband should spend more time outlining what Labour would do in government if they won the next General Election, according to an ITV News Index poll.

The five states in which the two unions spent more than $ 100 per teacher were Oregon, Colorado ($ 173.98), Montana ($ 141.74), Utah ($ 140.60) and South Dakota ($ 132.15)-- states in which there were hotly - contested political campaigns during the 2007 - 08 election cycle.

Cambridge, MA — A first - ever national analysis of state spending per teacher on political advocacy by the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) released today found that the national teachers unions and their state affiliates spent more than $ 100 per teacher in five states, with Oregon at the top of the list at $ 360 per teacher during the 2007 - 08 election cycle.

Among other things, the 25 - page report, entitled «An Agenda for Justice,» recommends an $ 18 - million increase to the budget of the Legal Services Society over the next election cycle to bring per - capita legal aid spending in B.C. in line with the Canadian average.