Sentences with phrase «elections data shows»

About 17,000 people voted in 2013, Onondaga County Board of Elections data shows, including roughly 1,100 voided or blank ballots.

Not exact matches

The drugmaker's political action committee spent $ 405,000 on federal campaign donations and other political outlays last year, more than in 2016 — an election year — and nearly double its allocation for 2015, data compiled by Kaiser Health News show.

Lilly's political spending was $ 548,100 for 2017, up 12 percent from 2015, the previous off - election year, the data show.

Regardless, the CrowdPAC data clearly shows that Silicon Valley is sticking with candidates on the left this election cycle.

The data, which was compiled from Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings by CrowdPAC, a non-partisan organization aimed at analyzing money in politics, revealed what the candidate's own filings have been showing for the last several months: Silicon Valley loves Bernie and can't stand Trump.

The first exit poll data released on Election Day shows that just about 4 in 10 voters are excited about a possible Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton presidency.

The Facebook data privacy and Russian election interference scandals show that artificial intelligence is still not up to many critical jobs in the technology sector.

Channel 4 News broadcast clips Tuesday that also show Nix saying his data - mining firm played a major role in securing Donald Trump's victory in the 2016 presidential elections.

This week our Big Data Barometer, focusing on the mood around the French elections, shows a further decline although tentative signs of improvement can be seen.

The GDP and retail sales data, pointing to more cautious expenditure by US households, contrasted with readings for consumer confidence, which generally showed little sign of dipping from the elevated levels seen since the US election.

A CNBC analysis of county - level voting and jobless data shows that, in the past six presidential elections, counties with higher levels of unemployment has generally favored Democratic candidates.

Data shows that 87.3 % of the electorate voted in the Scottish referendum compared with little more than 60 % in recent general elections.

This is reinforced by time series data from the British Election Survey showing the proportion of strong party identifiers, and the contrast over time is striking - «very strong» party identification plummeted from around 50 % in the mid-1960s to the mid-teens by 2001.

[2] Using survey data conducted after every election from 1964 to 2010 we show that it is the psychological ageing explanation that seems the most plausible.

In fact, Democrats have only controlled both chambers twice in the last twenty years (103rd and 110th Congresses) and historical data show that there are thirteen states that Democrats have not won in the last seven elections,, and five they have only won once, totaling almost 160 electoral votes.

British Election Study data released today (collected between February and March 2014) shows that 17 % of people intend to vote for UKIP in the May European Parliament elections (23 % when counting only people giving a party choice, excluding «don't know» responses).

Data from British Election Study panel surveys shows that the main problem UKIP has faced in translating its success from European Parliament elections to general elections has been retaining voters, whether because some UKIP voters only vote UKIP at European Parliament elections in protest and the return to their «normal» party for general elections or because the nature of the British electoral system incentivises voters to cast their vote for one of the existing main parties rather than a new entrant.

Bringing the data together, our poll therefore shows that smart leadership communications could win the General Election.

Data from the latest disclosure filings show the effectiveness of the program during this election cycle.

State election data from the same year show more than 5.8 million, or about 95 percent are registered.

The data shows for the first time that Hamilton spent around # 11,000 on transport during the European elections, while Farage spent # 350 on transport during the same campaign.

Despite the borough's dead - red reputation, there are actually more registered Democrats on file with the Board of Elections for Staten Island than registered Republicans, data shows.

Cahill recently submitted poll data to the Board of Elections that shows a tighter - than - expected race.

Cruz - linked groups spent nearly as much money into Cambridge Analytica as Trump backers, show data from the 2016 election cycle.

The NY Post's Fred Dicker says confidential polling data shows Hillary Clinton could lose the presidential election in heavily Democratic New York to Trump as the GOP front - runner's support grows to the point of being «surprisingly strong.»

James Morris, who worked for Labour from when Ed Miliband was elected leader in 2010 until the election, said public polling showed a much more favourable position than the party's internal data, both in the run - up to and during the campaign.

The data shows that only 5 % of the voters think foreign policy is the most important issue in the presidential election.

Because it's Friday, we bring you Bras for Hillary; Compete data shows a blowout for Barack Obama, but RealClearPolitics averages show a different story; are suffering from election fatigue?

Ryan said that a president's party typically loses seats in midterm elections but that party data show the GOP would hold the House if the election were held now.

A review of data provided by the U.S. Elections Project shows that that percentage is the lowest since 1980 — the first year that the Project started tracking.

The governor today reiterated the vow to help get members of his own party elected to the Senate even as he pointed to poll data showing one of the Democratic conference's chief goals — taxpayer - financed elections — is unpopular among New Yorkers.

Ratings for Ming Campbell however remain atrocious — the YouGov tracking data showed him slumping after the local elections and YouGov's monthly poll found only 6 % of people thought that he would make the best Prime Minister (though that said, like the Dunfermline by - election during their leadership crisis, the Bromley & Chistlehurst by - election shows it doesn't necessarily stop them winning votes).

If 2015 was the year that showed us the feral negativity and limited value of the public sphere, it was also the campaign that shored up the importance of data and the point where micro-campaigning, long a mainstay of US elections, finally found its feet in Europe, albeit in a very European (and less intrusive) way.

Confidential polling data shows Hillary Clinton could lose the presidential election in heavily Democratic New York to Donald Trump as the GOP front - runner's support grows to the point of being «surprisingly strong,» The Post has learned.

In most, if not all, of these districts, Board of Elections voter enrollment data show registered Democrats outnumbering registered Republican voters 4 - to - 1, or more in some cases.

The recent Marist College poll showed Paterson badly trailing former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani in a hypothetical general election matchup but the data inside the poll was even more troubling for Paterson.

Data released by the government on the day it called the general election shows that eight of the 18 schools sponsored by grammar schools that have been inspected by Ofsted are rated as requires improvement, while two are inadequate.

A new analysis in the context of the election, drawing on data from March, shows we're going back in time, in essence.

The data plotted in the figure should be shown in the United States presidential election debates.

But as of early afternoon Tuesday, neither Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg nor his high - profile chief operating officer, Sheryl Sandberg, had made public comments about the mushrooming crisis, which now involves a reported Federal Trade Commission probe, demands by Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill for testimony by Zuckerberg, and the release of an undercover video by a British television station that appears to show the head of the data analytics firm talking about bribes and traps to sway elections.

A British television station broadcast video Monday apparently showing the head of the data analysis firm Cambridge Analytica, which worked for President Trump's 2016 campaign, talking about using bribes, traps involving sex workers and other unethical tactics to swing elections around the world.

What these documents show, though, is that in 2014 one of Russia's biggest companies was fully briefed on: Facebook, microtargeting, data, election disruption.

In an interview on Vox's The Ezra Klein podcast show, Mark Zuckerberg discussed many things such as user data and privacy, the rampant increase in fake news, election interference, and much more.

Cruz - linked groups spent nearly as much money into Cambridge Analytica as Trump backers, show data from the 2016 election cycle.

The Democrats used superior tactics with far more data points about voters than Cambridge Analytica ever claimed to have about American voters, one expert explained to Radio Sputnik's Loud & Clear, which shows that «on balance,» the real story is that the Cambridge Analytica scandal had no impact on the election.

Channel 4 News broadcast clips Tuesday that also show Nix saying his data - mining firm played a major role in securing Donald Trump's victory in the 2016 presidential elections.

In a wide - ranging interview on Vox's The Ezra Klein Show podcast, Zuckerberg discussed election interference, the handling of user data and privacy, the proliferation of fake news, and what to do when your company — with more than 2 billion users — reaches a size and scale where the consequences for failure have a massive impact.

A British television station broadcast video Monday apparently showing the head of the data analysis firm Cambridge Analytica, which worked for President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign, talking about using bribes, traps involving sex workers and other unethical tactics to swing elections around the world.

Channel 4 News broadcast clips Tuesday that show Nix saying his data - mining firm played a major role in securing Donald Trump's victory in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, including «all the data, all the analytics, all the targeting.»

Data uncovered by Chris Vickery, research director at UpGuard, a California - based cyber risk firm, shows a clear link between AggregateIQ and the strategy and activity of Cambridge Analytica and its parent company, Strategic Communication Laboratories (SCL), to use technology platforms, consumer information and social networks to sway voters in the favor of Republican candidates in U.S. elections, he said.