Elective repeat C - sections are slightly riskier than successful VBACs, because moms are at greater risk of infection, blood loss and organ injury.
Had the mother had
an elective repeat C - section at term, the baby would definitely be alive today.
On the other hand, if you consented to
an elective repeat C - section, everything would be covered and you would not lose any insurance benefits.
Indeed, there has been an uptick in complications (ie a DECREASE in safety) by iatrogenically converting
elective repeat C - sections to urgent ones.
Why then, does she not also have the RIGHT to have
her elective repeat C - section schedule in the 38th week after an appropriate informed consent discussion?
Not exact matches
Each
C - section was a
repeat elective, although I have been researching for years about safety in all different environments and with all different interventions and assistants.
When the time came for my second, The OB and I had long conversations about a
repeat vaginal birth vs.
elective c - section.
Repeat and
elective CS have lower rates of morbidity and mortality than emergent
CS.
Meaning
elective and
repeat CS are included in that.