Sentences with phrase «embers diagram»

Relationships between various impacts reflected in each RFC and increases in global mean temperature (GMT) were portrayed in what has come to be called the «burning embers diagram.»

Schnellnhuber talks about the increase in concern with temperature increase since 2001: burning embers diagram: 2 °C increase no longer considered safe.

It's probably fairly safe to assume that he didn't pick any of those IPCC scientists who were «dubious about the scientific validity of the burning embers diagram».

If Schneider was thinking that the burning embers diagram might achieve the sort of influence enjoyed by the hockeystick, he'll be disappointed with its impact so far.

«Some of the scientists (including some senior functionaries) involved» in the report «were dubious about the scientific validity of the burning embers diagram, and I just could not push it through,» he said.

One reader was so incredibly unimpressed with the embers diagram that I was inspired to consider holding a contest to see what other ways readers can devise to illustrate climate risks accurately but also in a way that captivates.

Not exact matches

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [1], [19] summarized broad - based assessments with a «burning embers» diagram, which indicated that major problems begin with global warming of 2 — 3 °C.

After I wrote about how the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change created and then dropped the «burning embers» diagram showing how environmental risk rises with emissions and time, some readers said it was horribly ineffective in any case.

The conclusion is similar to that in the «burning embers» diagrams from the third Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report and a recent paper.

Back in February, when I wrote about the «burning embers» diagram of climate risk that was left out of the 2007 reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a reader, Josh J. of Snow Hill, N.C., gave the artwork this review:

In 2001, when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change produced its third set of reports examining the causes and consequences of global warming, it included a fascinating illustration, called the «burning embers» diagram, showing gradients of rising risk with rising temperatures.

Just in case you think this is new, review the posts here about the «burning embers» diagram from the 2001 intergovernmental panel report and the realities behind the oversimplified notion of climate tipping points.

Martin Parry, a co-chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, described the report, released in April 2007, from which the «embers» diagram of risk was excluded.

The report takes the approach used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in its «reasons for concern» section and the diagram known as «burning embers» — both of which essentially illustrate how rising temperatures equate with rising risk in a variety of areas that matter to society.

One way to communicate the fuzzyness of the variables determining the «Reasons for concern» about climate change is to use smooth gradients of colours, varying continuously from green to red (see IPCC, 2001a, Figure SPM 2, also known as the «burning embers» diagram).