Sentences with phrase «endangerment finding under»

In short, «An endangerment finding under Section 202 (a) does not simply identify a health and welfare risk, as EPA contends; it also establishes the criteria that will inform whether the emission standards adopted to address that risk are rational....

Moreover, once EPA made an endangerment finding under section 202 and began regulating stationary sources under PSD, it was predictable that EPA would sooner rather than later develop greenhouse gas performance standards for industrial source categories under section 111, also a Title I authority.78 Title I and Title II may be «separate» but they are not «entirely separate»; they are linked.

«It seems clear to me that the administration will do what they can to limit the damage of an endangerment finding under the Clean Air Act,» he said, pointing to Obama's recent comments at a press conference that concerns about impacts on consumers should be taken into account in cutting emissions.

Not exact matches

The EPA's stance, however, was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in April 2007, and one of the first actions of Lisa Jackson, the new EPA administrator under the Obama administration, was to declare CO2 and other greenhouse gases a threat to public health and welfare and release a proposed endangerment finding largely built on the earlier ignored analysis.

The EPA's endangerment finding kicks off a process to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from the aviation industry, the latest sector to be regulated under the Clean Air Act after cars, trucks and large stationary sources like power plants.

What's more, rescinding the plan does nothing to address its underlying basis: the 2009 EPA Endangerment Finding that requires the agency to take action under the Clean Air Act to curb emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.

[3] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, «Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under the Clean Air Act,» in Federal Register, Vol.

In the wake of the recent «endangerment finding, the IPI analysts conclude that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has sufficient authority under the Clean Air Act to create a cap - and - trade system all by itself, without Congressional input:

This is the EPA's role under current law, but the EPA is not fulfilling its assigned mission nearly to the extent that current law not only allows, but also expects, given the stated dangers as listed in the endangerment finding.

Rud, when I talk to those of the Progressive Left who are most concerned about climate change, and who want the United States to become the leader in finding ways to reduce carbon emissions, they pretty much go silent when I inform them that the EPA has legal authority under the Clean Air Act and the 2009 Endangerment Finding to do much more in placing limits on carbon emissions than the agency is actuallyfinding ways to reduce carbon emissions, they pretty much go silent when I inform them that the EPA has legal authority under the Clean Air Act and the 2009 Endangerment Finding to do much more in placing limits on carbon emissions than the agency is actuallyFinding to do much more in placing limits on carbon emissions than the agency is actually doing.

There remains the fact that the EPA's 2009 Endangerment Finding for carbon pollution, written under the authority of the Clean Air Act, has been upheld by the US Supreme Court.

Moreover, under the Clean Air Act, the EPA is charged with mitigating those dangers to an extent which is commensurate with the stated gravity of those dangers, as they are described in the endangerment finding.

EPA adds insult to injury with its endangerment finding for greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.

Guith's comments belie the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's official policy priorities for 2017, which include plans to, «Oppose EPA efforts to regulate greenhouse gases under the existing Clean Air Act, including the endangerment finding.»

, which include plans to, «Oppose EPA efforts to regulate greenhouse gases under the existing Clean Air Act, including the endangerment finding.»

As a member of the large plaintiff group in Massachusetts v. EPA, we celebrated the Supreme Court's April 2007 decision declaring CO2 a pollutant under the Clean Air Act and ordering the Environmental Protection Agency to take the next step toward regulation by making what's called the «endangerment finding» — an agency determination that a pollutant «endangers public health and welfare,» leading directly to controls on that pollutant.

Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under the Clean Air Act (284 pages,.

With a proposed rule on light - duty vehicles waiting in the wings, the agency issued today — opening day for the climate talks in Copenhagen — its «endangerment finding» concluding that GHGs pose a threat to both public health and welfare, tests required under the Clean Air Act in order to regulate emissions from point sources, such as power plants, manufacturing plants, and vehicles.

questioned the process used to evaluate the scientific basis for EPAâ $ ™ s proposed endangerment finding for greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.

Whether «best - available - control technology standards» are crafted by the Congress or put in place by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the court - ordered mandate stemming from the Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v. EPA and the Obama administration's subsequent «endangerment finding,» such an approach will be relatively ineffective and terribly costly for what is accomplished.

66), introduced on January 21, 2010, disapproving (stopping) EPA's regulatory action under the endangerment finding could save the Administration.

The Court might not have been so quick to dismiss the risk of «extreme measures» had it understood how a section 202 endangerment finding would affect EPA's obligations under other provisions of the Act.

Disapproves the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on December 15, 2009, relating to the endangerment finding and the cause or contribute findings for greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.

Based on its U.S. endangerment finding, EPA can regulate GHG emissions via, for example, New Source Performance Standards under Section 111 (the authority for EPA's Clean Power Plan).

Comprehensive climate change legislation was under consideration in the Senate after having passed the House, the Copenhagen Accords had been signed the previous month, the Environmental Protection Agency had announced its Endangerment Finding on greenhouse gases, and the climate science community was under vitriolic attack by the denial machine.

In testimony for the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) public hearing (earlier post) on the proposed endangerment finding for greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act (earlier post), Stanford Professor Mark Jacobson urged the EPA to include black carbon in the finding.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency today issued a «Denial of Petitions for Reconsideration of the Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202 (a) of the Clean Air Act.»

In his speech, Michaels spoke about the need to vacate the Endangerment Finding, a piece of legislation which classified carbon dioxide as a pollutant and allowed the EPA to regulate it under the clean air act.

WHEREAS, the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) «Endangerment Finding» and proposed action to regulate CO2 under the Clean Air Act is based on H. [flawed] questionable.

The free - market think tank, which has a history of intellectually hi - larious denialism, says the «Environment (sic) Protection Agency» silenced an internal dissenter in the course of its endangerment finding, a process that concluded in April that greenhouse - gases threaten public health and can be regulated under the Clean Air Act.

Under the Trump administration, Milloy said, global warming deniers would be able to participate in debates to kill key climate polices from the Obama administration including the endangerment finding; [46]

Opposing the EPA's efforts to regulate heat - trapping emissions under the Clean Air Act, including the endangerment finding, remains a priority for the US Chamber.