Sentences with phrase «endangerment finding about»

«-RRB-, are all a-twitter over an apparently «suppressed» document that supposedly undermines the EPA Endangerment finding about human emissions of carbon dioxide and a basket of other greenhouse gases.

Not exact matches

Wigley, in a private email not intended for public consumption, muses about «reopening the public comment period» for Michael's PhD (this is an allusion to Michaels calling for a reopening of the EPA's endangerment finding on CO2).

In World Climate Report yesterday, we have this note about EPA economist Alan Carlin's «suppressed» piece on the proposed EPA Endangerment Finding.

«It seems clear to me that the administration will do what they can to limit the damage of an endangerment finding under the Clean Air Act,» he said, pointing to Obama's recent comments at a press conference that concerns about impacts on consumers should be taken into account in cutting emissions.

«The messages of the two points outlined in the extract above are: (1) the claims about increases in frequency and intensity of extreme events are generally not supported by actual observations and, (2) official information about climate science is largely controlled by agencies through (a) funding choices for research and (b) by the carefullyselected (i.e. biased) authorship of reports such as the EPA Endangerment Finding and the National Climate Assessment.»

Rud, when I talk to those of the Progressive Left who are most concerned about climate change, and who want the United States to become the leader in finding ways to reduce carbon emissions, they pretty much go silent when I inform them that the EPA has legal authority under the Clean Air Act and the 2009 Endangerment Finding to do much more in placing limits on carbon emissions than the agency is actuallyfinding ways to reduce carbon emissions, they pretty much go silent when I inform them that the EPA has legal authority under the Clean Air Act and the 2009 Endangerment Finding to do much more in placing limits on carbon emissions than the agency is actuallyFinding to do much more in placing limits on carbon emissions than the agency is actually doing.

I think there absolutely is momentum, but the one thing I'll say is that rescinding the endangerment finding, and this is something Ted Cruz talked about quite a bit when he ran for president.

Guith: I think there absolutely is momentum, but the one thing I'll say is that rescinding the endangerment finding, and this is something Ted Cruz talked about quite a bit when he ran for president.

Although this report focuses on a new approach to showing critical absence of a tropical hot spot, which indeed carries an important inference of invalidity of USEPA's principal «line of evidence» in their GHG Endangerment Finding, the report has even more interesting findings about other aspects of climate science.

Some of the scientists on the Heartland Institute list have a lot to say, about the endangerment finding and more.

In an interview with Time Magazine last week, Pruitt said he planned to model his red - team, blue - team debate on Cold War - era discussions of the Soviet nuclear threat and suggested that he believed his agency did not «engage in a robust, meaningful discussion» about the threat posed by carbon dioxide before adopting the endangerment finding.

This is a direct outcome of the Endangerment Finding I opposed in 2009 — and unfortunately about the worst possible outcome.

Having looked into just about every claim of connections (more even than I mention in that post), I've found no evidence for any of them in the US, which, IMAO, negates the EPA's «endangerment».

Thus, «By the end of the rulemaking, EPA had fully explained all of the choices it made along the path of converting available scientific knowledge about lead toxicology and exposure into a policy - based finding of endangerment from automotive lead emissions sufficient to justify regulation, and allow — and survive — judicial review.»

In his speech, Michaels spoke about the need to vacate the Endangerment Finding, a piece of legislation which classified carbon dioxide as a pollutant and allowed the EPA to regulate it under the clean air act.

Since the Endangerment Finding's public comment period ended in June, 2009, troubling revelations about the conduct, objectivity, reliability, and propriety of the IPCC's processes, assessments, and contributors have become public.

I may have a few disagreements with Mr. Pruitt about how soon to get rid of the unscientific EPA CO2 Endangerment Finding, but Pruitt is definitely on the right track.