Sentences with phrase «energy board review»

He promised that Canada was «back» on the International stage as a major contributor to global action on climate change, he promised to make real reconciliation with Indigenous peoples a pillar of his agenda, and he promised to overhaul the shattered National Energy Board review process for every single pipeline project.

Editor's update: The Trudeau government has announced it will begin preparing «transition plans» for existing pipelines under review and strengthen National Energy Board reviews.

Not exact matches

Molopo Energy's new board, led by Perth - based chair Samantha Tough, has announced the sale of its major asset and commenced a cost - cutting review, following a board shake - up last week.

Calgary based Enbridge, the company behind Northern Gateway, has emphasized its commitment to safety and the environment, saying the National Energy Board Joint Review Panel, which held two years of hearings on the project, had made many of the company's voluntary commitments a mandatory part of the conditions for approval.

The project will still face at least National Energy Board approval, but more likely a federal joint review panel including both the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and the National Energy Board, similar to the proceedings currently underway for the Northern Gateway Pipeline.

The move came after Canada's National Energy Board announced a broader review of the Energy East project, including its impact on upstream and downstream greenhouse gas emissions.

TransCanada put its application on hold in September after the National Energy Board said would use a tougher review process that would include looking at indirect emissions related to the pipeline, from production to end use of the oil.

This project has been rigorously reviewed by the National Energy Board after an exhaustive hearing process and a thorough review of facts.

Senator Black said the project has been rigorously reviewed by the National Energy Board (NEB) after an exhaustive hearing process and a thorough review of facts.

Alberta's Wildrose Party Leader Brian Jean says he's fed up with Montreal Mayor Denis Coderre for «interfering» with the National Energy Board's independent review process of the Energy East pipeline.

News Release Ottawa, April 25, 2018 — The Senate demonstrated confidence in the National Energy's Boards rigorous review and approval of the Trans Mountain Pipeline project with the adoption at 2nd reading Bill S - 245, the Trans Mountain Pipeline Project Act.

VICTORIA — The National Energy Board is shutting out important voices by limiting the scope and depth of participation in the Joint Review Panel hearings on the Kinder Morgan pipeline expansion, say the New Democrats.

The year - long review of the Ontario Energy Board will look at consumer protection, as well as how the board should be structured and how to adapt to new technoloBoard will look at consumer protection, as well as how the board should be structured and how to adapt to new technoloboard should be structured and how to adapt to new technologies.

During the Energy East review Board members violated the arms - length relationship required in dealings between an NEB Panel and project proponent.

A review of the documentation submitted to the National Energy Board (NEB) by Kinder Morgan reveals that other assumptions which led to the pipeline's approval are also questionable.

The Tsleil - Waututh Nation, whose traditional territory surrounds the Burrard Inlet at the pipeline's endpoint, has already mounted two legal challenges of the National Energy Board's review of the pipeline, and further challenges by First Nations are likely to come.

The opacity inherent to how the power authority will finance the Harbor Lights project — and who will repay the authority for the privilege — appears to have drawn the attention of NYPA's internal auditor, who recommended the agency hire a consultant to review the energy efficiency program in question and cited Harbor Lights as one project needing review, according to the authority's December board documents.

Regarding the Solar Farm proposal currently before the Town Board, solar energy is always good, but a large facility has to be reviewed so as to ensure that the adverse impacts, such as the potential impacts on aesthetics and the natural character of the surrounding area, are either avoided or minimized to the point that they are not significant.

The Ulster County Legislature appoints the five - member body to constitute the UCRRA Board and has both a Recycling Oversight Committee (where UCRRA Board member and Kingston resident Charlie Landi is appointed as liaison) and an Energy and Environment Committee that «set policy and review contracts pertaining to but not limited to the activities of the Ulster County Resource Recovery Agency».

According to the Article X regulations used for review and approval of significant energy - production projects, the final siting board has seven members and forms only when a final application is made.

[BOX 5] Alliance of Third Class Non-Profit Mailers, 1981 - 1982 Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs (OES) files I, 1981 II, 1980 - 1981 III, 1978 - 1980 IV, 1979 - 1980 Council of Allied Engineering and Scientific Societies, 1969 - 1981 Council of Allied Engineering and Scientific Societies, 1981 - 1982 Department of Education, 1977 - 1978 Energy Research Advisory Board Multiprogram Laboratory Panel, 10/15/81 -11 / 19/82 Institute of Medicine - I, 1982 - 1983 Institute of Medicine - II, 1979 - 1982 Roger W. Jones Award, 1979 - 1980 W. K. Kellogg Foundation, 1982 Mellon (Andrew W.) Project, 1978 National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Files: I, 1981 - 1984 National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Files: II, 1981 - 1982 National Committee on Public Employee Pension Systems (PEPS), July 1982 National Governors» Association Meeting - Task Force on Technological Innovation, 2/21/82 National Publication Act of 1979 Office of Technology Assessment, 1972 - 1973 Peace and Conflict Resolution, 1980 Pensions for Professionals, 1971 - 1972 Saturday Review of Science, 1972 - 1979 Scientists and Engineers Emigrant Fund, 1978 - 1979 SOHIO, Standard Oil of Ohio Grant, 1982 - 1986 Technology in Science - Advisory Board, 1981 Tyler Prize, 1984 - 1985 White House Study of Science and Engineering Education, 1980 Znaiye (Soviet Scholarly Society), 1971 - 1977

«Given the current climate — I mean, political situation — in Washington, I'm wondering whether highlighting [clean energy] is something we still want to do,» board member G. P. (Bud) Peterson asked today during the board's review of the next edition of Science & Engineering Indicators, a biennial compendium of global trends in science and technology.

Review co-author Andrea Ferrari, who chairs the Executive Board of the Graphene Flagship, and is director of the Cambridge Graphene Centre, offers a soberly optimistic view of the potential for graphene in this area: «Graphene and Related Materials have great promise in these areas, and the Graphene Flagship has identified energy applications as a key area of investment.

He serves on the Lujan Center Neutron review committee at LANSCE, the Advisory Board for the Hydrocarbon Resources Gordon Research Conference and is a panel expert on the International Energy Agency (IEA) task on Hydrogen Storage.

A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood: Encouraging Solar Development through Community Association Policies and Processes — This guide, written for association boards of directors and architectural review committees, discusses the advantages of solar energy and examines the elements of state solar rights provisions designed to protect homeowner access to these benefits.

Year in Review: Calico and the Buck Institute Are Collaborating on Research into Aging and Potential Therapeutics for Age - related Diseases Top Grant from the NIH Faculty Awards Published Research Buck Faculty Share Their Expertise Worldwide Buck Labs Focus on mTOR Pathway Live Longer, Live Well — New Donor Groups Get Behind the Buck's Mission Full STEAM Ahead: Unique Partnership Helps Marin and Sonoma Schools Meet New Science Standards Energy and Climate Change Visionary Jostein Eikeland Pledges $ 5 Million to the Buck Scientific Advisory Board Board of Trustees Financial Summary Buck Advisory Council Cumulative Donors and Sponsors Honor Roll of Donors

Certification applications are submitted to a review board and examined for quality of energy medicine work using Healing Touch for Animals ® techniques.

The editorial board of the San Antonio Express newspaper said Augustine's «ties to the energy industry clearly disqualify him from leading an independent review.»

the movement identified their best target: the National Energy Board — the independent regulator responsible for reviewing the project.

On October 14, 2014, after more than four years of hearing testimony from residents, visiting the wind project, studying the science on wind turbine noise, speaking to researchers, and reviewing noise testing results, the Brown County Board of Health correctly and courageously declared Duke Energy's Shirley Wind turbines a «Human Health Hazard» in accordance with Brown County and Wisconsin state statutes.

Canada is currently in the process of reviewing environmental acts, regulatory processes, and the National Energy Board (a federal regulatory body), with the intent of restoring lost environmental protections and public trust in major project approvals.

Marc Ó Riain is the president emeritus of the Institute of Designers in Ireland, a founding editor of Iterations design research journal and practice review, a former director of Irish Design 2015, a board member of the new Design Enterprise Skillsnet and has completed a PhD in low energy building retrofit, realising Ireland's first commercial nZEB retrofit in 2013.

The case, brought forward by the Gitga'at and other coastal First Nations, argued the province erred when it handed over decision - making authority for the project to the federal government under a provincial - federal Joint Review Process managed by the federal National Energy Board.

After gutting most of Canada's federal environmental legislation to expedite tar sands development and pipeline proposals at the behest of the oil industry, now the federal government is making it more difficult, and in some cases impossible, for members of the public to participate in the National Energy Board's (NEB) review of Enbridge's proposal to reverse its Line 9 pipeline through southern Ontario and Quebec.

Questions about potential conflicts of interest, for example, have been raised about the IPCC Chair's service as an adviser to, and board member of, for - profit energy companies (Pielke, 2010b), and about the practice of scientists responsible for writing IPCC assessments reviewing their own work.

Among other positions, Prof. Dr. Nakicenovic is Member of the United Nations Secretary General High - Level Technical Group on Sustainable for Energy for All Initiative; Member of the Advisory Council of the German Government on Global Change (WBGU); Member of the International Council for Science (ICSU) Committee on Scientific Planning and Review; Co-Chair, Scientific Steering Committee of the Global Carbon Project (GCP); Member of the Board, Climate Change Centre Austria (CCCA); Member of the Working Group of the Austrian Panel on Climate Change (AG - APCC); Member of the Panel on Socioeconomic Scenarios for Climate Change Impact and Response Assessments; Member of the Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21) Steering Committee; Member of the International Advisory Board of the Helmholtz Programme on Technology, and Member of the Earth League.

The recent approval of the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline by National Energy Board and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act review panel has brought a renewed flurry of attention to the project.

He has authored more than 300 publications and is also Editorial Board Member of several scientific journals, such as Journal on Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Climate Policy, Energy Policy, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, the International Journal of Energy Sector Management, Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, The Scientific World Journal, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, and the Journal of Energy Strategy Reviews.

Burnaby's counsel Gregory McDade, of Ratcliff & Co., issued the shocking threat in a raft of regulatory filings earlier this week aimed at disrupting the National Energy Board's review of the project.

For example, in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC, No. 16 - 712, the Court held that inter partes review — an adversarial proceeding conducted by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board — does not violate the Seventh Amendment.

EA processes and decisions have been increasingly subject to lawsuits, criticism and protests, with the target of dissent being either the project (say, Kinder Morgan's controversial proposed oil sands pipeline) or the reviewing body (e.g., the National Energy Board).

This opportunity is perhaps most pronounced in the reviews of federal environmental assessment processes and the National Energy Board (NEB).

They also made the environmental law rollbacks an election issue in 2015 and led the Prime Minister to direct his cabinet ministers to undertake the review of four major federal environmental laws, processes and bodies: the Fisheries Act, Navigation Protection Act, environmental assessment processes and the National Energy Board.

This case was decided a week after the Governor in Council announced approval forthe Northern Gateway Enbridge Pipeline Project, and during the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Pipeline Project regulatory review by the National Energy Board.

In November 2015, the Prime Minister mandated several Cabinet Ministers to review four of Canada's environmental laws and processes: the Fisheries Act, Navigation Protection Act, the National Energy Board, and federal environmental assessment processes.

The government has said yes to the pipeline, dependent on Enbridge meeting the 209 conditions that were imposed by the National Energy Board following its earlier review.

Under the Harper government, the 2012 omnibus budget bill dramatically weakened environmental laws including shifting pipeline reviews to the industry friendly National Energy Board, and restricting who can participate in the process.

The Tsleil - Waututh Nation has launched a legal challenge of the National Energy Board's (NEB) review of the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain pipeline and tanker project.

Nation says unlawful conduct of National Energy Board, including one - sided cross-examination process, could derail pipeline review

LexisNexis ® Martindale - Hubbell ® AV Preeminent ® Peer Review Rating Super Lawyer ® 2015 list in Construction Litigation Claims & Litigation Management Alliance, Journal of American Law Editorial Board Legal Elite in Construction Law by Business North Carolina Magazine 2013 LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Associate, 2011 Bar Register of Preeminent Women Lawyers by Martindale - Hubbell ® Best Construction Blog, Design and Construction Report, 2011 Triangle Impact Law Leader 2008 by Business Leader Magazine Triangle Business Journal's 2006 «40 Under 40» award