In Ontario, if the International Commercial Arbitration Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 9 applies, then it provides that the UNCITRAL Model Law (and the New York Convention on the Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards as is contained in the UNCITRAL Model Law) is the law of Ontario.
Not exact matches
As part
of China, Hong Kong is also a Convention on the Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention) Contracting State, ensuring that arbitral awards issued where the seat of arbitration is Hong Kong benefit from this internationally renowned system of mutual recognition and enforcement of arbit
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention) Contracting State, ensuring that arbitral awards issued where the seat of arbitration is Hong Kong benefit from this internationally renowned system of mutual recognition and enforcement of arbitral
Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention) Contracting State, ensuring that arbitral awards issued where the seat of arbitration is Hong Kong benefit from this internationally renowned system of mutual recognition and enforcement of arbitral a
Awards (the New York Convention) Contracting State, ensuring that
arbitral awards issued where the seat of arbitration is Hong Kong benefit from this internationally renowned system of mutual recognition and enforcement of arbitral
arbitral awards issued where the seat of arbitration is Hong Kong benefit from this internationally renowned system of mutual recognition and enforcement of arbitral a
awards issued where the seat
of arbitration is Hong Kong benefit from this internationally renowned system
of mutual recognition and
enforcement of arbit
enforcement of arbitralarbitral awardsawards.
The Convention's aim is not to limit the pre-existing freedom
of the Contracting States to treat
foreign arbitral awards or arbitration agreements
as favourably
as they please, but rather to facilitate their recognition and
enforcement to the greatest extent possible.
Although article V (1)(d) moves beyond the text
of the 1927 Geneva Convention, it is not
as liberal as certain arbitration statutes, which attach even less importance than the New York Convention to the law of the country where the arbitration took place at the recognition and enforcement stage.854 As explained in the chapter on article VII, 855 the Convention sets only a «ceiling», or the maximum level of control, which courts of the Contracting States may exert over foreign arbitral award
as liberal
as certain arbitration statutes, which attach even less importance than the New York Convention to the law of the country where the arbitration took place at the recognition and enforcement stage.854 As explained in the chapter on article VII, 855 the Convention sets only a «ceiling», or the maximum level of control, which courts of the Contracting States may exert over foreign arbitral award
as certain arbitration statutes, which attach even less importance than the New York Convention to the law
of the country where the arbitration took place at the recognition and
enforcement stage.854
As explained in the chapter on article VII, 855 the Convention sets only a «ceiling», or the maximum level of control, which courts of the Contracting States may exert over foreign arbitral award
As explained in the chapter on article VII, 855 the Convention sets only a «ceiling», or the maximum level
of control, which courts
of the Contracting States may exert over
foreign arbitral awards.
While
enforcement, a
foreign arbitral award shall, on the application being made to the appropriate court by any party, be enforced by execution by the court under the Code
of Civil Procedure 1908, in the same manner
as if it were a decree
of the domestic Court.
The Convention on the Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, also known
as the «New York Arbitration Convention» or the «New York Convention», is one
of the key instruments in international arbitration.
Based on the factums submitted to the SCC, the appellant (Yugraneft) is arguing that international
arbitral awards should be considered, at least for
enforcement purposes, equivalent to
foreign judgments, and,
as such, should benefit from the 10 - year limitation period under s. 11
of the Alberta Limitations Act.
The Convention on the Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, done in New York, 10 June 1958 (the New York Convention), is described
as the most successful treaty in private international law.
The UK will remain a signatory
of the Convention
of the Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958, more commonly known
as the New York Convention.
His international disputes practice focuses on cases involving one or more
foreign companies, persons, or governments,
as well
as disputes involving other interests
of foreign countries, such
as enforcement of foreign judgments or
arbitral awards, international discovery, and service
of process abroad.
He has a wide range
of experience in all key aspects
of international arbitration and litigation, including
enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and state court judgments in Russia and abroad
as well
as obtaining interim measures from Russian courts in support
of foreign proceedings.
Services in the Arbitration Practice include serving
as local counsel in connection with international commercial arbitrations, assisting in matters relating to the
enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and representing clients in arbitration proceedings.
China and Canada are parties to the Convention on the Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, also known
as the New York Convention.
The new ICAA contains a number
of changes from its predecessor, including: Adoption
of the the Convention on the Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (also known
as the «New York Arbitration Convention»).
The application
of the Convention on the Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, also known
as the «New York Convention», and whether it applies to the joint venture members, is often one
of the considerations in deciding to include a mandatory arbitration clause in a joint venture agreement.
Sometimes both levels
of government legislate,
as they did to implement the New York Convention on the Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
Recognizing the growing importance
of international arbitration
as a means
of settling international commercial disputes, the Convention on the Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the Convention) seeks to provide common legislative standards for the recognition of arbitration agreements and court recognition and enforcement of foreign and non-domestic arbit
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the Convention) seeks to provide common legislative standards for the recognition of arbitration agreements and court recognition and enforcement of foreign and non-domestic arbitral
Foreign Arbitral Awards (the Convention) seeks to provide common legislative standards for the recognition of arbitration agreements and court recognition and enforcement of foreign and non-domestic arbitral
Arbitral Awards (the Convention) seeks to provide common legislative standards for the recognition of arbitration agreements and court recognition and enforcement of foreign and non-domestic arbitral a
Awards (the Convention) seeks to provide common legislative standards for the recognition
of arbitration agreements and court recognition and
enforcement of foreign and non-domestic arbit
enforcement of foreign and non-domestic arbitral
foreign and non-domestic
arbitralarbitral awardsawards.