«JB553108 ″: [W] hile
environmental journalism does serve an important role, the structure of society in the U.S. prevents environmental knowledge from becoming a real part of everyday life.
Not exact matches
The Times excelled at
environmental coverage before there was an environment pod, continued during that phase, and, I predict, will
do so going forward, within the financial constraints facing all
journalism.
Before attending the conference I didn't know that there was even a career in
environmental journalism, much less programs to prepare one for the field.
I'm not going to
do this travesty of climate
journalism any favors by repeating its riduclous claims, other than to point you to the wise words of China
Environmental Law, Climate Progress (by my colleague Joe Romm) and U.S. climate envory himself, Todd Stern (see half way down this link), all of which convincingly debunk the the claims of the Guardian piece.
There
does seem to be a persistence of low - grade enviro - journalists, some of whom still trot out the «declining temperatures» assertion, but I think that this is more indicative of a much broader problem with the standards in
journalism today and the guff that exists between the
environmental journalists» scientific understanding and the motives of the scientists / pseudo-scientists they either hero - worship or (cripplingly uncritically) pen - push press releases on their behalf.