Not exact matches
Envoy said that, once the trial judge found that if the bid had been properly conducted
Envoy would have been awarded the contract for the
relocation services, then
Envoy's loss of profit on that contract was the proper measure of damages.
The investigation and the ensuing contract cancellation were prompted by complaints from Prudential
Relocation Canada and
Envoy Relocation Services — two of the five
relocation companies that originally bid on the federal government contract.
Prudential and
Envoy had serious concerns about bias in the contract tender review process, complaining that the evaluation criteria alone clearly favoured Royal LePage, the incumbent
relocation services provider.
Sun Media reports that the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) has backed
Envoy Relocation Service's complaint that the procurement process for the federal government's lucrative public servant
relocation contract was flawed, and awarded the company $ 2,400 as reimbursement for its bid costs.