Not exact matches
European Council Directive 2000 / 78 / EC, which established «a general
framework for
equal treatment in employment and occupation», sets out in Article 4.2 that organisations with an ethos based on religion or belief, such as «faith» schools, can treat persons differently in recruitment and employment on the grounds of religion or belief where there is «a genuine, legitimate and justified occupational requirement».
Our proposed
framework would include
equal treatment in regulation balanced by a strong focus on quality assurance.
The upsurge in xenophobia is a stark reminder that the human rights
framework — protecting human dignity and ensuring
equal treatment — is a compass in times of crisis.
This
framework must also include the fair
treatment and meaningful community involvement of all people with respect to the development, implementation and enforcement of any impacts related to transportation planning and policy to ensure everyone enjoys the same degree of protection from environmental and health hazards and
equal access to the decision - making process to have a healthy environment in which to live, learn and work.
In its judgment of 26 January 2011, the Court of Appeal held that neither the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 («DDA 1995») nor Directive 2000/78 / EEC establishing a general
framework for
equal treatment in employment and occupation («the
Framework Directive») afford protection from discrimination on grounds of disability to unpaid volunteers.