Not exact matches
The MSCI USA
Quality Index is comprised of 125 stocks in the MSCI USA Index that have high quality scores based on return - on - equity, earnings growth and financial le
Quality Index is comprised of 125 stocks in the MSCI USA Index that have high
quality scores based on return - on - equity, earnings growth and financial le
quality scores based on
return - on -
equity, earnings growth and financial leverage.
We maintain our focus on high -
quality equity, fixed income securities and a diversified portfolio designed to achieve solid risk - adjusted
returns.
SUMMARY It's difficult to rationalise why there should be excess
returns from high
quality stocks The Quality factor needs to be constructed beta - neutral to achieve positive returns Exposure to the Quality factor is an attractive hedge for an equity - centric portfolio INTRODUCTION The con
quality stocks The
Quality factor needs to be constructed beta - neutral to achieve positive returns Exposure to the Quality factor is an attractive hedge for an equity - centric portfolio INTRODUCTION The con
Quality factor needs to be constructed beta - neutral to achieve positive
returns Exposure to the
Quality factor is an attractive hedge for an equity - centric portfolio INTRODUCTION The con
Quality factor is an attractive hedge for an
equity - centric portfolio INTRODUCTION The concept of
Assuming this to be the case, investors may want to consider both a moderately lower
equity weighting as well as a higher weight to
quality stocks, i.e. those with high
return on
equity, earnings consistency and low leverage.
The most common
Quality metric is
Return on
Equity, used in three funds, followed by Debt - to -
Equity is used in two.
When the investor is young, they tilt
equities toward the MSCI USA Diversified Multiple - Factor (DMF) Index to boost
returns via value, size momentum and
quality beta exposures.
Research by Agcapita Partners, a Canadian agriculture private
equity firm, shows that one of the beneficial investment
qualities of farmland in North America is that is has a very low (slightly negative = -0.13) correlation to stock market
returns.
Luis Mirón, director of the Loyola Institute for
Quality and
Equity in Education at Loyola University, said the success of what he called the «charter surge» has been based on temporary measures — a recovery school district that will eventually
return schools to the Orleans Parish School Board and millions in federal recovery dollars, he said.
Quality generally describes financially healthy firms with high
return on
equity, with stable earnings growth and low financial leverage.
An actively managed core Australian
equity portfolio with a focus on investing in
quality stocks predominantly in Australia characterised by strong
returns on capital with a sustainable competitive advantage.
Assuming this to be the case, investors may want to consider both a moderately lower
equity weighting as well as a higher weight to
quality stocks, i.e. those with high
return on
equity, earnings consistency and low leverage.
Factor - based investing provides a route to objectively capture inexpensive companies (via value factors) or companies with robust balance sheets and steady
returns on
equity (via
quality factors).
Because of these fascinating
qualities, investors in stocks that start with the letter U have enjoyed some of the best
equity returns over the last eight years.
Stock selection is focused on two key fundamental drivers of long run
equity returns — Value and
Quality.
What do measures such as debt - to -
equity,
return - on - capital, and gross profitability tell us about companies» relative
quality?
The benefit of investing in
equities of companies with higher accounting
quality is fewer defaults (4 vs. 5) and a higher total
return (13.2 % vs. 11.6 %).
Measuring the
quality (reducing our information asymmetry) of the companies whose
equities we are considering adding to our portfolio can improve our investment
returns.
The team ranks the stocks in this universe based on a series of growth factors, such as the change in consensus earnings estimates over time, the company's history of meeting earnings targets, earnings
quality and improvements on
return on
equity, as well as a series of value criteria, such as price - to - earnings ratio and free cash flow relative to enterprise value.
All stock selection is focused on two key fundamental drivers of long - run
equity returns: stock valuations and business
quality (as defined by measures of Profitability, Stability and Financial Strength).
Stocks with the
quality dimensions of earnings
quality (profitability),
return on
equity, and debt to
equity outperform those without them.
The Jensen
Quality Universe ™ includes only those businesses that have produced a
return on shareholder
equity of 15 % or greater in each of the past ten years, as determined by the Investment Team.
The Small Cap
Quality portfolio is a portfolio designed to systematically deliver return and risk characteristics of small cap quality stocks within the US equity
Quality portfolio is a portfolio designed to systematically deliver
return and risk characteristics of small cap
quality stocks within the US equity
quality stocks within the US
equity market.
The Fund also borrows and sells a «Short Portfolio» of 15 - 35 listed
equities, which the Manager deems to be of inferior
quality and prospects, and expects to deliver a below average investment
return.
Hartford Total
Return Bond ETF, Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF, Hartford Corporate Bond ETF, Hartford
Quality Bond ETF, Hartford Multifactor Low Volatility US
Equity ETF, and Hartford Multifactor Low Volatility International
Equity ETF are new and have limited operating histories.
Quality and quantity of resources translate into
return on
equity.
TimesSquare believes that its proprietary fundamental
equity research skills, which place particular emphasis on the assessment of management
quality, an in - depth understanding of superior business models, and valuation discrepancies, enable the firm to build diversified stock portfolios that will generate superior risk - adjusted
returns.
Lydon said the index SMDV tracks «includes
quality, dividend - growing companies that have delivered higher
return on
equity compared to other small - caps... without sacrificing earnings per share growth.»
Our stylized portfolios that blend six factors (volatility, value,
quality, size, momentum, and dividend yield) with four different strategies (marginal risk contribution, minimum variance, Sharpe - ratio weighted, and
equity weighted) demonstrated higher risk - adjusted
returns than the S&P 500 ®, with a lower tracking error than most single - factor strategies (see Exhibit 1).
Return on
equity is a measure of business
quality and we give higher marks to those firms that outperform their peers.
However, most agree that
quality consists of superior
return on
equity, earnings variability, and debt - to -
equity.
Low
Quality's Round Trip Bad News Bulls Stock Performance Following the Recognition of Recession The Beginning of the Middle Experimenting with the Market's Median Valuation Anchored Inflation Expectations and the Expected Misery Index Consumer Spending Break - Down Recessions and the Duration of Bad News Price - to - Sales Ratio May Prove Valuable International Markets Show Important Divergences Fixed Investment and the Technology Rally Global Yield Curves, Earnings Growth, and Sector
Returns Recessions and Stock Prices Adjusting P / E Ratios for the Market Cycle Private
Equity and Market Valuation Must Stocks Rise Following a Cut in the Fed Funds Rate?
And aside from those three firms, M&T is a bank with a history of top - tier
returns on
equity — and one of the highest
quality banks around.
Then, those companies are further screened based on measures of financial
quality such as
return - on -
equity, earnings variability and debt - to -
equity.
I'll generally award a 1.0 Price / Book multiple for companies earning anywhere between an 8 - 12 %
Return on
Equity — entirely dependent on the
quality of the company & its business model, plus the degree of risk and / or leverage involved.
«The growth factor ranking is based on long - term earnings growth expectations, while the
quality factor ranking is based on three year historical averages for
return on
equity and
return on assets,» according to the issuer.
We used three measures to capture the pertinent information:
return on
equity (ROE) to reflect growth and profitability; the debt coverage ratio to represent the likelihood of default; and the accruals - to - average - total - assets measure defined by Sloan (1996) to quantify possible accounting red flags.12 To arrive at company - specific
quality measures, we used the simple arithmetic average of each stock's percentile rank for these three variables.
The names of the Fund Option viz Life Corporate Bond Fund 1, Life Money Market Fund 1, Life Gilt Fund 1, Life
Equity Fund 3, Life Infrastructure Fund 2, Life Energy Fund 2, Life Midcap Fund 2, Life Pure
Equity Fund 2 and Life Balanced Fund 1 do not in any manner indicate the
quality of the Fund Option or their future prospects or
returns.