It follows a decision by Sweden's Central
Ethical Review Board earlier this year, which
concluded he had committed misconduct by releasing misleading results.
But irrespective of whether the senior person's
review is detailed, cursory, or zero, I don't see how anyone could
conclude that the «ghostwriting» that is so prevalent in all contexts in the legal community constitutes an
ethical breach — let alone one that could cost a lawyer his license or get a judge kicked off the bench!