Sentences with phrase «ethical rules require»

Not only do the ethical rules require a locum, but having someone handle your cases also offers great peace of mind — knowing that you have coverage and that your clients are well taken care of means you can relax on your vacation.

If an applicable ethical rule requires a scientist to «point out weaknesses and limitations,» do you think that is the same as «point out some but not necessarily all weaknesses and limitations»?

A complaint against the lawyer alleged a violation of an ethical rule requiring that the conduct of advocates «bear the stamp of objectivity, moderation and dignity.»

Not exact matches

These registrations require the advisor and the firm to follow specific rules of conduct and operations such as, client confidentiality and adhering to ethical practices.

This requires governing body members to behave with integrity, demonstrate strong commitment to ethical values and respect the rule of law, building on and expanding the Seven Principles of Public Life.

This strong ethical and moral responsibility is derivable both from the universally accepted moral principles including the widely accepted golden rule which requires people to treat others as they wish to be treated, and international law including, but not limited to the «no harm» rule which is a widely recognized principle of customary international law whereby a State is duty - bound to prevent, reduce and control the risk of environmental harm to other states and a rule agreed to by all nations in the preamble to the UNFCCC, the «polluter - pays principle» agreed to by almost all nations in the 1992 Rio Declaration, human rights law which requires nations to assure that their citizens enjoy human rights, and many other legal theories including tort law.

This strong ethical and moral responsibility is derivable both from the universally accepted moral principles including the widely accepted golden rule which requires people to treat others as they wish to be treated, and international law including, but not limited to: (a) the «no harm» rule which is a widely recognized principle of customary international law whereby a State is duty - bound to prevent, reduce and control the risk of environmental harm to other states, and a rule agreed to by all nations in the preamble to the UNFCCC, (b) the «polluter - pays principle» agreed to by almost all nations in the 1992 Rio Declaration, (c) human rights law which requires nations to assure that their citizens enjoy human rights, and (d) many other legal theories including tort law.

Like you, I believe that there are strategies the LSUC could pursue which would achieve their substantive goals, strategies which accurately reflect existing (and unambiguous) legal and ethical obligations and which are consistent with constitutional requirements and principles (as I've noted above, if the current requirement around a Statement of Principle merely required acknowledgement of our actual existing obligations under the Rules, rather than a general duty to promote equality, diversity and inclusion which is found nowhere in the Rules, I suspect much opposition would melt away and the LSUC would be on far stronger Charter grounds).

However, these attorneys are held to the same ethical rules and obligations as traditional law offices, and there are some areas that require close attention.

The ensuing backdating controversy now revolves around the question of whether the companies» reaction to the rule requiring expensing stock options unless priced at market by backdating them is either ethical or legal.

Do we have an ethical obligation to seek and obtain full disclosure when the Rules do not yet require us to do so?

While only a few states have adopted these exact provisions of the Model Code, essentially all states, through statute, rule, or ethical code, require judges to recuse themselves if their impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

While no ethical rules specifically require this, Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1.3 imposes a duty to act with «reasonable diligence» in representing a client.

In addition, their rules of require the designation of at least one person to bear responsibility for the ethical compliance of the entity.

Second, you may want to consider disclosing your judicial campaign contributions to opposing counsel even though the ethical rules do not specifically require you to do so.

With this change, rather than being obliged to conform to a specific set of proscriptive rules, firms are required to deliver specific outcomes regarding the management and the ethical compliance of the firm.

I am required by ethical rules to keep client communications private.

MDPs and other forms of ABSs should be permitted to deliver non-legal services together with legal services on the basis that [the same client, confidentiality, and ethical protections that we've encountered already, but with this interesting addendum:] If the public interest demonstrably requires that some non-legal services should not be provided together with legal services, the rules should so provide.

In the final rule we permit, but do not require, covered entities to use or disclose protected health information, consistent with applicable law and standards of ethical conduct, in specific situations in which the covered entity, in good faith, believes the use or disclosure is necessary to permit law enforcement authorities to identify or apprehend an individual.

While we will work mostly from the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, required reading will also include scholarship on the unique ethical and moral dilemmas of social justice lawyers, and students will be encouraged to think critically about the rules of Professional Responsibility and their application in social justice contRules of Professional Conduct, required reading will also include scholarship on the unique ethical and moral dilemmas of social justice lawyers, and students will be encouraged to think critically about the rules of Professional Responsibility and their application in social justice contrules of Professional Responsibility and their application in social justice contexts.

I found this article a lot of what if and conjecture, and frankly insulting to the majority of ethical and hard working Realtors, I have 29 years experience as a Realtor and have found that when both parties to the transaction are fully informed an agreement can be reached regardless of a dual or single agent representation, this needless to say requires the skill and a commitment to help both parties come to the best possible agreement in a non adversarial way, remember the golden rule.