Sentences with phrase «ethical scientists do»

Ethical scientist don't stop making a best estimate or climate sensitivity withou clearly explaining why and the implications for the projections made by climate models.

Not exact matches

With this comes new ethical questions: How do scientists acquire embryos and how are their projects approved?

While religious perspectives have nothing to do with the technical content of a lecture, they are relevant to a number of aspects of the academic situation.1 Where appropriate to the objectives of the course and closely connected with the subject matter, some of the questions which we have raised about the effects of an invention on society or the ethical dilemmas faced by the scientist can legitimately be mentioned in the classroom.

Scientists doing dual use research — beneficial work that may be misapplied for malicious purposes in the wrong hands — need more tools to help them understand the scientific, ethical and legal issues surrounding their work, according to a AAAS - sponsored workshop report.

I'd like to think that scientists have an ethical obligation to ensure that our work does no harm.

«How [do] you create scientists who aren't only good at all these different technical skills, but are very good at asking and thinking seriously about ethical questions, about moral questions, and coming to terms with the ramifications of their work?»

Next Wave asked Bill Joy, chief scientist at Sun Microsystems and author of Wired's April cover story,» Why the Future Doesn't Need Us,» what he thought of Varmus's answer to our question about ethical responsibilities.

Also included are essays from individuals who do clinical research in industries, large and small; a listing of the kinds of opportunities available to clinical scientists; a snapshot of some of the research topics clinical scientists pursue; and discussion of the ethical considerations that are part and parcel of working with human subjects.

The most significant finding of a recent study considered by the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications Group of the US Human Genome Project was the lack of demand for testing: people don't want it (New Scientist, 18 September).

So while scientists are doing their best to be ethical in their personal and professional lives, they may well find that the money they are putting by for their future serves less ethical purposes.

Challenging the belief that «all money is green,» and that people will cross ethical boundaries to amass it, social scientists from UC Berkeley and Stanford University have found compelling evidence that the source of wealth really does matter.

«Scientist have to leave the ivory tower to impact on society, but to do so credibly, advice must be based on sound, ethical and humane science.

If the Authors «want to examine... loci at which scientific knowledge is made,» Why not just say what we already know as «virtually certain»: the ipcc's method is almost exclusively «computer - simulated climate science» = gigo; «Expertly» guided by demonizing CO2 and disasterizing Global Warming and spurred onward always by the ethical maxim that «We «mainstream» Climate Scientists are all gonna die from Green Back Starvation Syndrome if we don't gin up some more demonizing and disasterizing «Climate Science» before it's too late!»?

I believe that the majority of climate scientists do feel personally comfortable that their work is ethical.

I don't see how this can be ethical or legal for a government funded scientist.

So, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again — the sane thing would be to give up and just live with the fact that Judith is having an impact and is an intelligent and ethical scientist.

But several independent and thorough reviews of the stolen emails found Jones and other scientists did not have any scientific or ethical lapses.

I have no problem with voices loudly opposing iron seeding experiments - if those voices present an ethical position and do not masquerade as scientists speaking of measured risk.

Climate scientists face an ethical choice: do they conform to established ethical standards of scientific practice or do they sacrifice those standards in favour of actions and statements that will be more likely to shape public opinion and climate policy in their preferred direction?

If an applicable ethical rule requires a scientist to «point out weaknesses and limitations,» do you think that is the same as «point out some but not necessarily all weaknesses and limitations»?

Some scientists have claimed that science does not have a moral value; but while pure knowledge may be ethically neutral, the way this knowledge is gained and the use to which it is put can involve many difficult ethical issues.

He said scientists ask why anyone would want to try as doing so crosses an «ethical red line.»

It doesn't take a political scientist to see it: The NAR bureaucracy fears that by taking the ethical highroad — prohibiting all non-agency — it'll lose the membership dues of those members who place monetary profit above ethical behavior and the public welfare.