Not exact matches
If the only rule
of ethics were, for example, «reasoning processes should not be interrupted,» then it would be absurd to oppose the abortion
of a
human embryo that had not yet developed a brain.
Another problem is that in its July 2009 Guidelines on
Human Stem Cell Research, NIH spelled out specific requirements about
embryo donation for newly derived lines, says Pilar Ossorio, a legal scholar who studies research
ethics at the University
of Wisconsin Law School.
«World's first genetic modification
of human embryos reported: Experts consider
ethics.»
A
human embryo — editing paper from a different Chinese team published in April 2015 touched off a worldwide debate about the
ethics of such experiments and led to calls for a research moratorium.
Geneticist Dana Carroll
of the University
of Utah in Salt Lake City, who was at the Napa meeting, says that it will call for discussions
of the safety and
ethics of using editing techniques on
human embryos.
Related trials Geneticist Xingxu Huang
of ShanghaiTech University in China, for example, is currently seeking permission from his institution's
ethics committee to try genetically modifying discarded
human embryos.
That report — a world first — fuelled global deliberations over the
ethics of modifying
embryos and
human reproductive cells, and led to calls for a moratorium on even such proof -
of - principle research.
A discussion
of the
ethics of genetically modified
human embryos had barely started before another ethically fraught application
of CRISPR / Cas9 made its debut.
Since then, the research has pitted groups that question the
ethics of harvesting stem cells from
human embryos against those that hope the line
of research could result in important medical breakthroughs.
Another team
of Chinese researchers, in Guangzhou, have already done an experiment editing the genes
of (non-viable)
human embryos; in December, a number
of the world's leading researchers met in Washington, D.C. to discuss the
ethics behind using CRISPR on
humans.