The cases are interesting for
European citizenship law, as they provide further insight into what the «fundamental status» of EU citizenship entails.
Not exact matches
In addition to above points Article 20 expressly provides Member states retain their responsibility for awarding or revoking national
citizenship thereby further distancing the two distinctintive identies of
citizenship by locating them in different legal procedural frameworks, one belonging to that of
European Treaty framework
law and one belonging within national jurisdiction.
Despite the existence of a democratically elected assembly since 1979 in the form of the
European Parliament, the links between this parliament and the status of Union
citizenship have been ambiguous [1] with the parliament representing not a single group of Union citizens but rather the «peoples» of Europe, those peoples being defined by Member States and national
law.
(3) Therefore, in the conduct of the negotiations mandated by Article 50 TEU which will presumably culminate in one of the conditions for the withdrawal of the United Kingdom being fulfilled, the government of the United Kingdom and the
European Union institutions are bound by the relevant general principles of EU
law to negotiate in good faith so as to find a political solution in order to fulfil insofar as possible the status and rights of those who shall be losing the status of EU
citizenship
This is particularly relevant as the EFTA court has been called upon to adjudicate rights analogous to those found in primary and secondary
law, but with the explicit caveat that the concept of
citizenship of the
European Union does not apply to nationals of EEA states.
For this, it examines the case
law of the
European Court of Human Rights on the one hand and the concept of EU -
citizenship on the other hand.
Nevertheless, the CJEU skilfully manoeuvres around the possible guarantees included in its own case -
law on
European citizenship and the ones triggered by Regulation 883/2004 on social security coordination.
Other fields of interest are Internal Market,
European Labour
Law and
Citizenship.
The time seems therefore ripe for a book like the one under review here, which is a volume of collected articles, edited by Maurice Adams, Henri de Waele, Johan Meeusen, and Gert Straetmans, fittingly entitled Judging Europe's Judges: The Legitimacy of the Case
Law of the
European Court of Justice (Hart Publishing 2013) examining the legitimacy of the Luxembourg Court in areas as diverse as the internal market,
citizenship, or the EU's external relations.
Her work covers Investors, exceptional or complex nationality applications, economic
citizenship, rights under
European law and family related immigration.
Select WebLaw Subject Guide Administrative
Law Biotechnology
Law Children & the
Law Citizenship and Migration Constitutional
Law Corporations
Law Criminology Cyberspace
Law Dispute Resolution e-Commerce
Law Environmental
Law European Union
Law Family
Law Government Health
Law Human Rights Industrial
Law Intellectual Property International
Law Law of the Sea Legal Research Media and Telecommunications Native Title Policing Privacy Property
Law Sports
Law Taxation
Law Women and the
Law
[18] Lord Mance himself (writing for a group of four judges on a seven - judge court) found it, in the context of a decision stripping a British national of
citizenship (with the corollary that he would also lose the benefits of being a
European Union national), «improbable that the nature, strictness or outcome of such a review would differ according to whether it was conducted under domestic principles or whether it was also required to be conducted by reference to a principle of proportionality derived from Union
law».
35 By its questions, which should be examined together, the referring court essentially asks whether the provisions of
European Union
law on
citizenship of the Union must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from refusing to grant a third country national a residence permit on the basis of family reunification where that national seeks to reside with his spouse, who is also a third country national and resides lawfully in that Member State and is the mother of a child from a previous marriage who is a Union citizen, and with the child of their own marriage, who is also a third country national.
In cases such as Pham, where
citizenship was at issue, it is quite possible that an applicant will be able to claim EU -
law rights (to which the doctrine of proportionality applies), Convention rights (to which proportionality also applies, subject to the additional limitation of the «margin of appreciation» at the
European level and, perhaps, to a «discretionary area of judgment» domestically [2]-RRB- and the protection of the common
law (certainly Wednesbury unreasonableness and, in some circumstances, the principle of legality [3]-RRB-.
(Freedom of movement for persons — Union
Citizenship — Directive 2004 / 38 / EC — Right of residence for more than three months — Article 7 (1)(b)-- Person no longer having worker status — Person in possession of a retirement pension — Having sufficient resources not to become a burden on the «social assistance system» of the host Member State — Application for a special non-contributory cash benefit — Compensatory supplement intended to augment a retirement pension — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Articles 3 (2) and 70 — Competence of the Member State of residence — Conditions for granting — Legal right to reside on the national territory — Compliance with
European Union
law)
• Administrative
Law • Antitrust & Regulated Industries • Asian
Law • Bankruptcy, Reorganization, & Creditors» Rights • Canadian
Law • Comparative
Law • Constitutional
Law, Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy Journals • Contracts & Commercial
Law • Corporate, Securities & Finance
Law Journals • Criminal
Law & Procedure • Cyberspace
Law • Discrimination,
Law & Justice • Employment, Labor, Compensation & Pension Journals • English & Commonwealth
Law • Environmental
Law & Policy •
European Law Journals • Evidence & Evidentiary Procedure • Experimental & Empirical Studies • Family & Children's
Law • Health
Law Journals • Housing & Community Development
Law • Forensic Economics • Immigration, Refugee &
Citizenship Law • India
Law • Indigenous Nations & Peoples
Law • Insurance
Law, Legislation, & Policy • Intellectual Property
Law • International
Law & Trade • LSN Educator: Courses, Materials & Teaching •
Law & Economics •
Law & Humanities •
Law & Humanities / Legal History (Archive) •
Law & Positive Political Theory •
Law & Society •
Law, Institutions & Development •
Law, Norms & Informal Order • Legal Education • Legal Ethics & Professional Responsibility • Legal History • Legislation & Statutory Interpretation • Litigation, Procedure & Dispute Resolution Journals • National Security & Foreign Relations
Law • Nonprofit & Philanthropy
Law • Property,
Citizenship, & Social Entrepreneurism • Property, Land Use & Real Estate
Law • Regulation of Financial Institutions • Tax
Law & Policy Journals • Torts & Products Liability
Law • Wills, Trusts, & Estates
Law • Women, Gender & the
Law • Young Scholars
Law
Whatever its extent, the claimants argue, the prerogative power can not be used to modify or remove the rights of UK citizens, in particular fundamental rights derived from
citizenship or directly enforceable private
law rights derived from the
European Treaties.
Reference for a preliminary ruling —
Citizenship of the Union — Extradition to a third State of a national of a Member State who has exercised his right to freedom of movement — Scope of EU
law — Protection of a Member State's nationals against extradition — No protection for nationals of the other Member States — Restriction of freedom of movement — Justification based on the prevention of impunity — Proportionality — Verification of the guarantees provided for in Article 19 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the
European Union