Not exact matches
The report has three sections: 1) Setting the Context, which
discusses the need for effective systems of
evaluation and support for school leaders; 2) Sharing Key Lessons Learned, which highlights how states and districts can work together to agree upon and communicate expectations for school leaders and implement standards - based systems of leadership support and evaluation, thereby increasing teacher effectiveness and improving student outcomes in all schools across the nation; and 3) Improving Standards Based Leadership Evaluation, which examines leader evaluation as a policy foundation for identifying, and supporting effective
evaluation and support for school leaders; 2) Sharing Key Lessons Learned, which highlights how states and districts can work together to agree upon and communicate expectations for school leaders and implement standards - based systems of leadership support and
evaluation, thereby increasing teacher effectiveness and improving student outcomes in all schools across the nation; and 3) Improving Standards Based Leadership Evaluation, which examines leader evaluation as a policy foundation for identifying, and supporting effective
evaluation, thereby increasing teacher effectiveness and improving student outcomes in all schools across the nation; and 3) Improving Standards Based Leadership
Evaluation, which examines leader evaluation as a policy foundation for identifying, and supporting effective
Evaluation, which examines leader
evaluation as a policy foundation for identifying, and supporting effective
evaluation as a
policy foundation for identifying, and supporting effective educators.
The contradictions between this message, and their actual methods, has been
discussed by Ed Fuller, Director, Center for
Evaluation and Education
Policy Analysis at Penn State — see his blog posting here.
A
policy team of 18 public and charter school teachers reviewed research, examined current
policies, and surveyed 197 colleagues to reach their conclusions, which will be
discussed tonight at a panel on principal
evaluations.
Paul Ronevich, science teacher at the Pittsburgh Science and Technology Academy, will
discuss his experiences using the data from student surveys, and William Hileman, Vice President of the Pittsburgh Federation of Teachers will
discuss the challenges and
policy implications of integrating student surveys into teacher
evaluations.
Panelists
discussed the program's development, review the
evaluation results, and consider the implications for
policy.
In Education Week, New Leaders» Chief
Policy and
Evaluation Officer Jackie Gran
discusses how high - quality leadership development programs provide a strong return on investment for districts.