Smith begins his exploration of a Christcentric hermeneutic in Chapter 5 by arguing that a truly
evangelical reading of Scripture always filters Scripture «through the single lens of the gospel of Christ.»
The Bible Made Impossible: Why Biblicism Is Not a Truly
Evangelical Reading of Scripture by Christian Smith Brazos, 234 pages, $ 22.99 How to Go from Being a Good Evangelical to a Committed Catholic in Ninety - Five Difficult Steps by Christian Smith Cascade, 205 pages, $ 24 Most of the time, Christian....
Not exact matches
Scripture does do something to us in worship, which is why it is a scandal that Catholic, Orthodox, Anglican and other traditions have more public
reading of Scripture in their services than we Bible - oriented
evangelical Protestants.
A great deal
of the strength
of the
evangelical Christian's life was derived from a meditative
reading of Scripture in this way.
Many
evangelicals are beginning to grasp the fact, that certain ways
of reading the
Scriptures and certain doctrines about the
Scriptures may actually become the means
of oppression
of modern women by the imposition
of first century social patterns.
One recent paper
read at a meeting
of the
Evangelical Theological Society (again, by a scholar from one
of Lindsell's «safe» schools) vigorously defended the inerrancy doctrine but then rushed on to the hermeneutical level to distinguish between the timebound Weltbild
of Scripture which may be discarded and the eternal Weltanschauung
of Scripture which must be preserved.
He debates whether we've made an idol
of the Bible and the way that Jesus
read scripture with
evangelical church leader Andrew Wilson, the author
of Unbreakable.
Clark Pinnock, in a perceptive paper entitled «The Inerrancy Debate Among the
Evangelicals,» warns that men like Francis Schaeffer and Harold Lindsell «tend to confuse the high view
of Scripture with their own interpretation
of it, so that unless one agrees with their
reading of the text he may be described as an unsound
evangelical or no
evangelical at all.
Introduction Scholars such as John B. Cobb and David R. Griffin have developed the Christological implications
of Whiteheadian process - relational thought in a number
of widely
read works in recent years.1 «
Evangelical» Christians, holding the Christian
scriptures to be the uniquely inspired and authoritative charter documents
of their faith, and finding in these
scriptures a Christ...
This peek into her courageous venture into a year
of «biblical womanhood» ought to be required
reading for all thoughtful
evangelicals - male or female - whose response to
Scripture is usually an unqualified nod
of approval.»
«There can be no question that such a thing can be counterintuitive for more traditional
evangelical doctrines
of Scripture,» Enns confesses, «since this is eisegesis (
reading meaning into
Scripture) rather thanexegesis (getting meaning from
Scripture).»
Scholars such as John B. Cobb and David R. Griffin have developed the Christological implications
of Whiteheadian process - relational thought in a number
of widely
read works in recent years.1 «
Evangelical» Christians, holding the Christian
scriptures to be the uniquely inspired and authoritative charter documents
of their faith, and finding in these
scriptures a Christ whose divine humanity defies explanation in terms
of any general metaphysical scheme, have had for the most part little interest in or even contact with these process - relational Christologies.2 That revelation presents to us this Christ is sufficient warrant for believing him; his being is, at any rate, incommensurate with ours.
President - Elect Donald Trump's pro-life platform against abortion, along with his support for traditional family values, marriage as stated in the Bible as one man and one woman instead
of same - sex marriage, in favor
of prayer and the
reading of sacred
scripture in our public schools, and his promise to appoint conservative judges to the United States Supreme Court made
Evangelicals and even Democrats who espouse those positions to support Donald Trump.