Sentences with phrase «everything you have said here»

Second, everything you've said here is a declaration of faith, rather than a substantial argument.

on the contrary, everything you have said here strongly implies that is the only acceptable course of action.

Yes yes yes to everything you have said here.

I agree with everything you've said here, Ruthie, and especially «I do not think the fact that the food is offered universally for free means that one does not have the right to challenge the status quo.

But yes, I agree with everything you've said here.

Everything I've said here I've said with journalism colleagues over the years and I definitely think it's an interesting conversation.

Not exact matches

But, here's the rub: I'll bet that, if you asked them, the executives in the room at that roundtable would say they do «everything» they can to encourage conversation.

: Here's everything President Trump, his lawyers, and his press secretary have said so far about his relationship with adult - film actress Stormy Daniels.

I will not enter that debate here, except to say that the reflections on memory that dominate Book X have everything to do with the story that Augustine has been telling to that point.

I mean right here, you have a man who wrote a very detailed and well crafted article citing actual references from the bible completely contradicting everything the religious zealots say and still they don't relent.

Suffice it to say everything you have here is purely subjective belief.

«Virtually everything I say here has been backed up by mountains of evidence acc.umulated by psychologists and social scientists over the years.

what is very interesting to me tonite is the folks who are positive there is no god... what is equally interesting is the snarling that appears whenever one does not «toe» the atheist line of no god... It has been said over and over here, «there is no proof of your God» ad nauseum I might add... OK... please, I am asking you in the nicest possible way... explain to me, without a Designed, where the universe and all it entails, first got its source... I really would like to know... from everything I see, I see beauty, design, tragedy, poetry, poverty, etc.... How did we begin to name or classify any of this... what intelligence gave us our intelligence... I have yet to see an anwer posited as to how it all came about, absent a Designer... I will wait for an answer... How did it ALL get here, and explain the precision and engineering of it all — right down to the last jot of DNA.

As Wellhausen once remarked, everything that Jesus said (save, I think, his teaching about God's «seeking the lost») can be found in the highest and best Jewish teaching; although Wellhausen had to add that much more may be found in this teaching which Jesus eliminated or rejected — our Lord's human genius here, if the word may be used, was in his selectivity.

One must make the contribution of one's spirit without abbreviation and distortion: everything depends here upon the legitimacy of what one has to say.

Suppose you were lost in the Adirondack woods at night — no moon, no stars, no guidance anywhere save, perchance, a distant gleam as of a lamp through a cottage window on a far - off mountainside — would you sit down and say, Because the noonday sun is not here to make everything perfectly clear, I will do nothing?

I could easy just say amen and nod passionately in agreement with everything you've said lately ---- I just wanted you to know that you are providing encouragement, insight, wisdom and helpful direction to a new generation of community builders here in Colorado.

Speaking to Premier, he said: «Here you are, you're in your 50s and your church isn't growing and you've been trying for a good four or five years, doing everything you can to try to help people to come faith and it hasn't worked.

Here's what the pontiff said at an interreligious prayer service at Ground Zero during his visit to the United States: «We can and must build unity on the basis of our diversity of languages, cultures, and religions, and lift our voices against everything which would stand in the way of such unity.»

... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself.

(I'm working from the assumption here, of course, that Jesus meant everything He is recorded to have said and would not take back anything He is recorded to have said.

Everything that needs to be said of Texas has already been said in the comments here.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

Here's the deal, man created god and everything man says about god has to be interpreted by other men who didn't write the man made stuff in the first place.

Winter wrote, «I agree that we would have done well to put a disclaimer saying, «Here is a very thoughtful article but you should know that we do not endorse everything he teaches.»»

Speaking of the «complexity» of the conflict, Welby admitted, «Everything you say here has to be qualified with the comment «but it's not as simple as that».

It's like Fox is just having writers write on something as opinion instead of ascertaining facts, getting in depth facts, reporting facts... tainted and with a ludicrous taint that Americans are just supposed to read and not be active in their communties... that all these foreigners are just supposed to be able to come here, sue and costs us money, not get along and that we are just supposed to do what the governement says... while these foreigners change everything weith the help of people like Obama... Fox would do well to keep their forums.

I have lots of recipes here and in my cookbook, and I dare say you'll find everything you need to get started off on the right foot.

Everything I make from here my husband and kids enjoy — your site has made the transition for us seamless and I just wanted to say thank you.

I'm halfway through reading everyone's comments and conjuring my own but I had to stop here because I think Alejandra said everything I was thinking in this and her prior comment.

«I keep hearing how the recruiting landscape has changed and blah and blah, but we have everything we need here to build it back to what it was,» he says.

I even thought top clubs were in for him.Some three or 2 seasons back many here were debating why he should be our main striker.As soon as you mention any other strikers name people would come out with stats and many things defending him.Even Wenger has defended him blindly in the past.People say Wenger's stubborn yeah.But don't we know that there's a reason why everything happens?Honestly speaking he's the reason why Arsene Wenger has failed to sign a top notch striker because he still believes in him.The funny thing is we signed Welbeck at that time who to me did nothing before to be the main man here.People keep saying Welbeck is hardworking and that he works his socks off.But the question is was that our reason for signing him.Welbeck being signed to challenge Giroud tells me a lot about Giroud's quality.Even Walcott (no offence to him) who has zero CF qualities was even chosen over him for a string of games and all in all I think he did well but has too many defeciencies for that role.We've compromised as a club and it'll come back to bite us.

Say hi to me too if anyone comes, and you can all give me the quick version of everything I've missed here since December.

I have said it here time and time again that Theo Walcott has everything needed to play as a striker except for strength and aggression.Theo Walcott will always lose the physical battle when his back is to goal.That is a huge concern because its reduces the potency of the attack.I would really hope he stays on the wing and Wenger should sign a Centre forward.You cant just be rotating week in week out just like that you need your players to play so they can find form.Theo should stay on the wing.

Quoting you «I've always thought supporting a Football Team is by choice and not a life and death situation» a lot of disgruntling fans here will disregard that statement and in their defense will say they love support the club and should they keep quiet and pretend that everything is fine with club like the akb and the gullible fans?

That's why I've been telling you guys I'm not Resource.Resource always says LACALEMAR.I don't do that.Why is there a need for me to have two accounts just to share transfer info?I've been correct about everything except Neymar.Please I've been very consistent in my updates.Read them very well.Insider sources don't generalise for the day.They give minute by minute info so one moment it could be here and the other moment there.They've broken many deals about so many clubs ahead of time with them making a mistake in the Neymar one.

I first watched Arsenal in 1976 and have been following home and away ever since NOT 2006, I also don't use twitter and don't play fifa, for the record I really am bored with the insinuation that if you criticise an Arsenal player, the owner or wenger then you don't support Arsenal, are happy with everything that's been going on since say the move to the grove?do you not ever think things should be done differently?did you never criticise a player?if you say no then I don't believe you.I make no hesitation in saying I'm very much on the side of the wenger out brigade, but never would I come on here and write what you've just done, for a start in might upset my seventy year old dad who is very much a AKB.I think you're just a keyboard warrior some how.Regardless though credit where credits due good performance today, and yes I did go

I'll get murdered on here for saying it, but despite everything at this moment I would take Mets over Mangala everytime.

Well written, but I think it will fall on deaf ears, my fear is as follows, it will take a loss in money for the manager and board to change, this will only come if we finish out of the top 4, but knowing the board they would still give home a season to try again, I feel very sorry for Sanchez, he is total quality and deserves better, most of the other players look settled, turn up give70 % and get paid, no matter what level you play at you should come off the pitch thinking I gave everything, how many of our players could say that, they lack motivation, player for player we are as good if not better than athletico Madrid but they have a manger that gets 100 % out of every player, Klopp is the same, but why would they leave their clubs to come here with a boar that cares about money not entertainment, Wenger was a lucky manager he inherited a top defence now his luck has run out

why are we so bias.Have we forgotten the man utd match last season where Ramsey changed everything in the midfield.Or maybe i watch a different arsenal playing altogether and i need glasses to tell me that Cazorla is better than Ozil and Ramsey is better than Cazorla at box to box.Well now I see why the team ai nt moving forward.I wonder which other top manager would play them together or the trio in the same lineup.How?Well @TH14 i hope you show your face here when this actually comes to a stumbling block and we might as well sell Ramsey according to what you are saying.

I will first preface everything I say here by stating I have no particular allegiance to, nor soft spot, for Mikel Arteta.

I've said this here before, but it's like he's everything Chip Kelly was supposed to be in the sense that he's incredibly aggressive, innovative and a great «culture» guy.

So far everything that I've said on here has happened exactly the way that my source said.

I could have said to myself: «I am here for four or five years, we win everything», [then] I leave and leave the club on the verge of bankruptcy.

Who said I care if anyone agrees with me.If you think anything I've said is not true then kindly point it out instead of saying its nonsense.I'm not forcing you or anyone to accept what I'm saying.I'm also expressing my views on the topic.Do you think everything here you've said has made sense?

Facts are stubborn things.yes they are but a kid in the village who watches Benzema and Giroud every week would know who is better and is his mind will also feel that he is light yes better than Giroud.for example some players might be better than some players but due to some reason stats may support them.i am not really looking at only goalscoring but i look at everything the player does on the pitch.i said it here first i would have used an 18 year old Chuba Akpom over Giroud.The midfield makes Giroud look very good.I do nt know what makes an inform Giroud better than an inform Chamakh or inform Adebayor or inform Bendtner.Giroud when i watch him to me is nothing just nothing special.stats do nt lie but my eyes wont lie and stats may not even be accurate.so as i said Benzema will always be light years above Giroud.how some people think we can compare Giroud to Benzema is beyond me.oh!

Everything he says here is true, we can't have one set of principles for top clubs then another set for teams who want to be a top club, it doesn't work like that.

Having said that, we have everything going for us in this game a game we should win NOT draw and some of you come here and start saying a draw was or would be a good result, we have to win and I don't care how, ugly 1 - 0 i don't care as long as we get 3 points because playing well now does not count its results that do and your (Tactics) if you have any (que wenger).

Here's everything managers involved in the fight for survival have said about the relegation battle...

After Arsene Wenger's three match touchline ban I was set to continue my week long rant, but this morning's (Saturday) Arseblog post covers everything I would have said so I shall just link to it here instead.