Sentences with phrase «evidence in the case clearly»

Shea says the evidence in the case clearly showed that the other driver was 100 percent at fault and admitted liability in the case, but the insurance companies for that driver refused to pay what he says was a very reasonable settlement.

Not exact matches

«All the evidence that was collected by the police department clearly indicated this individual was the prime suspect, and, it's unfortunate, but we will continue to allow the district attorney to proceed with her case and weighing the case to prosecute for the break - in of our office,» said DeMaio, a former San Diego city councilman trying to unseat Rep. Scott Peters (D - Calif.)

In retrospect, Vogl says it would have been better to write «probably» instead of «clearly» because a single case report isn't strong evidence.

«Considering that no prior research has conclusively demonstrated benefit of corticosteroid therapy for any manifestation of Lyme disease, including neurologic, rheumatologic or cardiac manifestations, we urge strong caution in prescribing corticosteroids in cases where facial paralysis is clearly the result of acute Lyme disease until better evidence is available,» said Dr. Jowett.

In the case where a reviewer is clearly wrong, politely approaching a program officer with clear evidence of how his views are not correct and [are] inconsistent with the views of others is probably the best approach.

Genetic factors are clearly indicated as evidenced by dominant mutations in three different genes have been identified that account for the small number of cases of familial, early - onset AD.

Cuban cites some cases of collaborative professional development that produced gains in scattered schools, but acknowledges that sustained evidence «has yet to emerge clearly.»

The evidence clearly points in favour of index funds over 5 to 10 year periods except in isolated cases (e.g. Australian domestic small to mid Cap funds or UK domestic mid and large cap funds) which exceptions may evaporate over time.

In any case, you state «this SUGGESTS that hurricanes MAY indeed become more destructive» — which clearly does not represent «strong evidence».

Maybe it would be open on the evidence for the trier of fact to make that inference, but it wouldn't amount to a hill of beans, even a campfire's worth, unless the inference was of a necessary connection in which case «substantial» is meaningless, if the issue is factual causation which is clearly what's referred to in para. 10 of Clements.

Given the obvious inequality of arms between the SRA and respondents, it seems that the answer to any SRA concerns would be to ensure cases of alleged disciplinary breaches are investigated properly and only presented to the SDT by way of clearly formulated allegations where clear evidence exists rather than rely upon a reduction in the burden of proof.

Even in cases where one or more findings is clearly erroneous, the appeals court can affirm if the judgment is supported by other findings or evidence on record.

Both cases show that it is possible to adduce third - party expert evidence in a form not governed by CPR Pt 35 and in circumstances where the author of the evidence will not be called, and, indeed, may not even be named or identified clearly.

In those cases, employers should be prepared to defend their position with evidence that sexualized dress codes can be legitimately linked to job requirements — which is clearly a high threshold to meet.

Clearly, the restriction on freedom of religion must be justified by evidence that the exercise of this freedom of religion will, in the circumstances of this case, have a detrimental impact on the school system.»

The form of special case was settled by the court at a judicial management conference, but counsel for the Appellants refused to sign the statement of special case because of the extensive disputed affidavit evidence that, by then, had clearly demonstrated that the parties were not in agreement with respect to the facts.

The House of Lords has clearly recognised that hearsay evidence has a crucial role to play in the presentation of a public authority's case to deal with problems caused to local communities, whether by way of anti-social behaviour in its many forms committed by individuals — many of whom are young and disaffected — or by the general nuisance which often attaches to premises where drugs are being used unlawfully.

The Court held that the competing injury causation theories in this case were clearly and unambiguously put to the jury via the evidence and particularly the expert evidence, in jury submissions by the parties, in the trial judge's explanation of the positions of the parties, and in her jury instructions.

10 (1) In a divorce proceeding, it is the duty of the court, before considering the evidence, to satisfy itself that there is no possibility of the reconciliation of the spouses, unless the circumstances of the case are of such a nature that it would clearly not be appropriate to do so.

In this case, held the appellate court, Managing Broker had clearly owed such a duty to Buyer, and had failed to produce any evidence that she had satisfied this duty.