Sentences with phrase «evidence of such things»

Where's your evidence of any such thing?

They'll say it's the commandments of their god, which they have yet to provide evidence of such a thing existing.

or to be more accurate, you chose to add god to the equation even though there is absolutely no evidence of such a thing.

Zeus does not exist (or at least there is not compelling evidence of such a thing) France exists.

«an atheist will never consider a theory that includes God» That is because there is no theory that can include god unless there is some evidence of such a thing.

There can be no evidence of such a thing, for you can no more prove revelation than you can prove what another man dreams of, neither can he prove it himself.

It IS irrational to leap to unjustified conclusions like a «creator» since there is no evidence of any such thing.

Myth: Stress causes cancer Truth: A big study in The Lancet found no evidence of any such thing.

Do you have any actual evidence of such a thing?

Not exact matches

The president also claimed that Comey had said there was no evidence of collusion between his aides and Russia, though Comey said no such thing.

While it will be merely the exception that proves his rule — namely, that there is no such thing as 100 % certainty in the science of probability — his (mainly Republican) haters will jump on this as evidence he's a huckster and a fraud.

We look to things such as contemporaneous corroboration, such as motive to lie, such as the totality of evidence (that photograph!)

You can not test the existence of things that only leave «supposed» traces of evidence, when the existence of such things is based on their pervasive influence yet pervasive elusiveness that remains elusive because nobody has yet to devise a means to find it yet.

You hit the nail squarely on the head for indeed so, biblical truths are «written on our heart» by way of the Presence of Christ's Indwelt Spirit Who is ever faithful to «guide you into all truth» and «show (us) things to come» (John 16:13) but the problem is (as is woefully evident with this Article \ s Author), too many people (believers) choose to eschew or disregard «sound doctrine» (2 Timothy 4:3) promulgating John 14:17 ignorance of the Doctrine of The Holy Spirit whose inevitable product is a darkened understanding (such as is evidenced by the Article's Author --RRB-.

You simply can't or won't face the fact that all evidence points to the facts that your conscious self is solely the product of your physical existence, that you are limited and temporary, and that there are no such things as gods, souls, heavens, hells, etc..

If we define faith as «confidence» or «conviction» based on the evidence presented, and once we recognize that there is no such thing as «degrees of faith,» then this leads to the truth that faith is not a work.

Remember, neither of you has a shred of external, verifiable evidence to back up anything you claim, so faced with conflicting beliefs supposedly backed by «personal experiences» or some such thing I haven't experienced, why should I take either of you seriously?

Sorry my delusional friend, but if 40 years of that wasn't enough to come up with any evidence or for Jesus to «touch» me or some such thing then obviously God doesn't care if I believe in him or not, so why should I care?

«We receive all these books, and these only, as holy and confirmation of our faith; believing, without any doubt, all things contained in them, no so much because the church receives and approves them as such, but more especially because the Holy Ghost witnessed in our hearts that they are from God, whereof they carry the evidence in themselves.»

If nothing else, the fact that there are published efforts to lay out a process theory of meaning is evidence that there is such a thing.

It is not evidence of any «end times» or any other such thing.

There is not a shred of verified evidence that any such things as you fantasize about actually happen.

The mental acquisition and interpretation of evidence requires such things as rational thought, memory, and the uniformity of nature, atheistic materialism can not provide such.

For example, against both dualism and reductionistic determinism and in favor of the pancreationist, panexperientialist view that the actual world is made up exhaustively of partially self - determining, experiencing events, there is considerable evidence, such as the fact that a lack of complete determinism seems to hold even at the most elementary level of nature; that bacteria seem to make decisions based upon memory; that there appears to be no place to draw an absolute line between living and nonliving things, and between experiencing and nonexperiencing ones; and that physics shows nature to be most fundamentally a complex of events (not of enduring substances).

This thing, however, of becoming the Emperor's son - in - law might readily be subjected to the tests of reality, so that the laborer would he able to ascertain how far the Emperor was serious in this matter, or whether he merely wanted to make fun of the poor fellow, render him unhappy for the rest of his life, and help him to find his way to the mad - house; for the quid nimis is in evidence, which with such infinite ease can turn into its opposite.

«Not only have I never done this, I should not have to explain away this false charge because there is not one shred of evidence that I have ever done such a thing.»

There is a difference between the «historical» Jesus, who quite frankly there is also zero evidence actually existed... no records, nothing, while there are records of other prominent people of that time period... you'd think if Jesus had really done such miraculous things there'd be a record other than the bible somewhere, but there's not... and the mythological Jesus which was created using the possible historical Jesus as a template.

If they give such things away to the poor, there will be nothing left to provide evidence of God's grace.

It is not necessary for certain ideas to have evolved, as is evidenced by other cultures (not to say in any way that they are wrong, however, there are practices that oppose the morals ingrained in us by the society we live in) so could a parent raise perfectly good children without the bible, in this day in age, probably yes, but you must recognize, that much of what they will be teaching will come from their society, adn quite honestly I'm not sure honoring your parents, and not killing are such a bad thing.

'' That tells people that I am at least intelligent enough to require proof of existence» = > It does no such thing as you can not claim nor do you have evidence as to what is beyond measurement or accountability by accepted scientific method.

We both accept, I think, these four related things about human knowing: (1) sentient experience of «physical things» is intrinsically infused with objective meaning, purposefulness and value; (2) flowing out, of this and intertwined with it is, at least for humans, «cognition» of the physical, and moral experience of such value; (3) this moral experience and engagement reveals the spiritual realm as something foundational to and «abstractly distinguishable» from the physical realm — values for Ward, mind for me; and (4) one piece of evidence for making such a distinction is the uniquely «publicly....

This is evidenced in such things as Barth's eschatologically oriented framework of creation, reconciliation and redemption; his focus on promise and hope rather than the present possession of God's reign; the reconfiguration of experience as a determination toward the future; the placing of the divine summons to action — the ethical life — at the summit of each volume of his doctrinal work; and, above all, his refusal to make his theology an apology for Christendom or to give priority to the established church.

Ignoring the evidence is just denying the truth, but you do bring up a good point with how quickly things can be twisted over such a short period of time after something has occurred.

When we have deduced what we deduce by our reason and from study of visible nature, and then read what we read in His inspired word, and find the two apparently discordant, this is the feeling I think we ought to have on our minds» not an impatience to do what is beyond our powers, to weigh evidence, sum up, balance, decide, and reconcile, to arbitrate between the two voices of God» but a sense of the utter nothingness of worms such as we are; of our plain and absolute incapacity to contemplate things as they really are; a perception of our emptiness, before the great Vision of God....

That democracy can be made to work, that by the scientific method we can gain mastery over the latent resources of the universe, that trial by jury is practicable, that torture is a foolish method of seeking evidence in the courts, that chattel slavery is a failure — such things we take for granted, not because we individually are wiser than our forebears, who disbelieved them all, but because we share in a social tradition which we did not even help to create, but which has shaped and conformed our thinking with irresistible power.

A 2 - 2 draw with Fulham on home soil might just be a sign of further positive things to come from the Tangerines of Blackpool but we need to see further evidence before we start backing Blackpool in such difficult fixtures like this one with Newcastle United.

It is ridiculous in many ways that there is even such a thing as «evidence - based policy», in the sense that, surely, it prompts anyone sensible to ask: «Er, yes, of course policies should be evidence - based.

Eventually, if everyone comes to accept such clear evidence of superiority, there will be no more need for costly elections to decide things - everything can be settled with a tape measure.

«(The Times is) not recognizing, necessarily, the steps that he has to carefully go through to bring together evidence in a very high - profile case such as this and that speed isn't always the best thing for any of the parties in terms of seeking justice,» said Vacco.

I'm not aware of any such evidence, but it's certainly an interesting thing to consider and study.

Title 18, Section 333 of the United States Code, says that «whoever mutilates, cuts, disfigures, perforates, unites or cements together, or does any other thing to any bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt issued by any national banking association, Federal Reserve Bank, or Federal Reserve System, with intent to render such item (s) unfit to be reissued, shall be fined not more than $ 100 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.»

During the period, evidence submitted in the trial showed that Percoco still appeared to act as a protector for Cuomo, taking care of such things as brewing personnel matters.

«But when the Lord Jesus Christ met me, He persuaded me by showing me clearly that there is such a thing as the evidence of things that are not seen.

There is a body of evidence showing the benefits of synchronizing education times with teens» body clocks; interestingly, while «studies of later start times have consistently reported benefits to adolescent sleep health and learning, there [is no evidence] showing early starts have a positive impact on such things», add the researchers.

But evidence now suggests that such moments of trauma have a much more enduring impact on our health, and may affect things like hormonal balance and adrenal performance many years later.

This reminds me of how we know things intuitively, or perhaps even literally seeing the consequences of things such as this, yet are told there is no «evidence.»

The question must then arise: why are they saying these things in the face of such strong scientific evidence rebutting them?

percent free christian online dating has many millions of such evidence as an effort to prove that change is a good thing.

While there is scientific evidence that such things affect the parts of our brain which deal with those emotions, these chemicals will not force someone to fall in love with you.

But there's no such thing as a sure thing, as clearly evidenced by his snub in favor of costar Michael Shannon, who played the lawman tracking him down.