Sentences with phrase «evidence on school choice»

Unaddressed but relevant peer - reviewed evidence on school choice policies suggest that the claimed academic and economic benefits of ESAs are speculative and overstated.

A Friedman Foundation (now Ed Choice) survey of the empirical evidence on school choice looked specifically at the impact choice programs had on public schools.

A week after Wisconsin Watchdog trumpeted WILL's voucher findings, National Review Online did the same in an article headlined, «New Evidence on School Choice Successes in Wisconsin: Higher test scores for students who attend schools their parents freely choose.»

In A Win - Win Solution: The Empirical Evidence on School Choice, Dr. Greg Forster compiled 28 fiscal studies, 25 of which revealed school choice proposals save money.

This research was summarized by the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice in their 2016 report, A Win - Win Solution: The Empirical Evidence on School Choice.

In A Win - Win Solution: The Empirical Evidence on School Choice, Friedman Foundation senior fellow Greg Forster looked at 12 empirical studies that «examined academic outcomes for school choice participants using random assignment, the «gold standard» of social science.

The findings about segregation from «A Win - Win Solution: The Empirical Evidence on School Choice» are not ambiguous.

In April, Greg Forster, also of the Friedman Foundation, released the third in a series of reports on school choice which includes vouchers and, to a lesser extent, educational savings accounts and tax credit scholarships: «A Win - Win Solution: The Empirical Evidence on School Choice.»

In today's release of the fourth edition of a Friedman Foundation flagship report — A Win - Win Solution: The Empirical Evidence on School Choice — author Dr. Greg Forster says,

These results are one part of Dr. Greg Forster's A Win - Win Solution: The Empirical Evidence on School Choice, which we recently updated and released.

(See, for instance, this report by the former Friedman Foundation, now EdChoice, «A Win - Win Solution: The Empirical Evidence on School Choice»....

The fourth edition of A Win - Win Solution: The Empirical Evidence on School Choice brings together 100 empirical studies on each of these essential questions in one comprehensive report.

[2] Greg Forster, «A Win - Win Solution: The Empirical Evidence on School Choice,» Fourth Edition, EdChoice, May 2016, http://www.edchoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/A-Win-Win-Solution-The-Empirical-Evidence-on-School-Choice.pdf (accessed October 26, 2016).

As the evidence on school choice continues to grow, it is tempting to compare the results achieved by school voucher programs to those of charter schools — to ask whether one option or the other represents a more promising avenue for expanding educational opportunity.

The most frustrating thing about Diane Ravitch's new book, Reign of Error, isn't the way she twists the evidence on school choice or testing, or her condescending tone toward leaders trying to improve educational outcomes, or her clever but disingenuous rhetorical arguments.

Finally, most of the previous reviews of the evidence on school choice have generated more fog than light, mainly because they have been arbitrary or incomplete in their selection of studies to review.

Not exact matches

So it is that we bring together in this issue the best of the new evidence on how choice may be affecting public schools as well as a robust, informed conversation about its longer - term potential.

To explore the influence of school choice on district policy and practice, we scoured media sources for evidence of urban public - school districts» responses to charter competition.

On the contrary, the evidence seems to suggest that the families that are most in need of school choice — minorities, low - income households, and students with lower prior academic achievement — are more likely to apply.

Rather than bet their legacy on a single idea such as universal pre-school or school choice, Kane argues that state policymakers should use the ESSA evidence requirements to create the infrastructure for piloting and testing interventions.

On the other hand, he defies proponents of charters, vouchers, and other forms of school choice as wishful thinkers disposed to let marketplace theories trump evidence of student achievement while also undervaluing education's civic and cultural roles.

These lessons add to MDRC's evidence on the implementation of small high schools of choice in New York City.

The most commonly cited school choice review, by economists Cecilia Rouse and Lisa Barrow, declares that it will focus on the evidence from existing experimental studies but then leaves out four such studies (three of which reported positive choice effects) and includes one study that was non-experimental (and found no significant effect of choice).

The sum of the reliable evidence indicates that, on average, private school choice increases the reading scores of choice users by about 0.27 standard deviations and their math scores by 0.15 standard deviations.

As a result, a typical theme is that there is «little evidence» on school choice, so that only «preliminary» and «tentative» conclusions can be reached.

International evidence suggests that adoption of market - based education policies that rely on school choice and competition between schools over enrollment often leads to segregation of children into different schools according to their socio - economic background, race or parents» awareness of educational opportunities.

It's also a cautionary tale regarding charter - school authorizing, particularly when done on a large scale, and will inevitably be used by school - choice foes in the U.S. as evidence in support of their scary predictions that chartering will lead to «witchcraft schools» and such.

Or, given that Slate is precisely backward about nearly every aspect of the Swedish educational experience, should we assume on the Swedish evidence alone that school choice is good?

There is now a body of evidence on the effects of school choice: the positive findings from Charlotte comport with the positive results of privately funded programs in New York; Washington, D.C.; and Dayton, as well as pilot voucher programs in Milwaukee and Cleveland.

Indeed, when we calculate effects by the percentage of students at a high school who attend college, we find no evidence of effects on college choice in the schools with the lowest college - sending rates.

We find clear evidence that the availability of public school - choice options under NCLB increased demand for information on school quality.

But this result provides suggestive evidence that charter school entry induces parents to obtain school - quality information and that the effect of choice on demand for information may not be limited to NCLB.

For more information on New Orleans, read «Good News for New Orleans: Early evidence shows reforms lifting student achievement,» by Douglas N. Harris, and «The New Orleans OneApp: Centralized enrollment matches students and schools of choice,» by Douglas N. Harris, Jon Valant, and Betheny Gross.

To incorporate empirical evidence when possible, we draw on data from interviews with 21 parents and surveys of 504 parents about the OneApp and school choice, conducted in the spring of 2014 by the Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE).

For more information on New Orleans, read «Good News for New Orleans: Early evidence shows reforms lifting student achievement,» by Douglas N. Harris, and «Many Options in New Orleans Choice System: School characteristics vary widely,» by Paula Arce - Trigatti, Douglas N. Harris, Huriya Jabbar, and Jane Arnold Lincove.

This study of Washington, DC's, Opportunity Scholarship Program (OSP) provides the first experimental evidence on the effect of a publicly funded private school choice program on college enrollment.

School Choice: Evidence and Recommendations, a collection of 10 policy briefs on specific topics under the umbrella of choice, brings together some of the top scholars in the field and presents a comprehensive overview of the best current knowledge of these important polChoice: Evidence and Recommendations, a collection of 10 policy briefs on specific topics under the umbrella of choice, brings together some of the top scholars in the field and presents a comprehensive overview of the best current knowledge of these important polchoice, brings together some of the top scholars in the field and presents a comprehensive overview of the best current knowledge of these important policies.

To learn more about the available empirical evidence on the effects of school choice programs, flip through this handy slide show, curated collectively and carefully by EdChoice's research team.

Last week, several news outlets circulated a report by the U.S. Department of Education's research division that found negative results for students who participated in the District of Columbia's Opportunity Scholarship Program (OSP), the only private school choice program for low - income children in Washington, D.C. Predictably, opponents of school choice descended on the report to tout it as evidence that school choice does not work.

Here is evidence on how expanding school choice afftects the achievement of kids who are «left behind»: https://jaypgreene.com/2009/04/27/systemic-effects-of-vouchers-updated-42709/

They contend that the evidence points to a mismatch, specifically that «a school choice program's impact on test scores is a weak predictor of its impacts on longer - term outcomes.»

As we look at the evidence on private school choice — the actual evidence, not speculation — we should consider it in comparison with the continuing epidemic of ethnic segregation in the public school system.

If the evidence does not clearly show the superiority of a high - regulation approach to school choice, we may need to rely on our values when deciding how to proceed.

Within the limitations of available data and methods, the empirical evidence is very encouraging for private school choice on ethnic segregation — just as it is on academic outcomes, effects on public schools, fiscal effects and effects on civic values and practices.

The RAND study focuses on three key variables that schools focused on to varying degrees — flexible pacing, student choices to personalize learning, and evaluation based on evidence of proficiency.

In this regard, there is a body of evidence indicating that information on racial composition dominates school choice searches.

School choice opponents have seized on these findings as evidence that these programs are ineffective and even harmful while advocates point out that Louisiana is heavily regulated, the first few years of an evaluation tell only the worst part of a story (i.e. there are transition effects), and that we should be careful about a heavy - handed focus on test scores.

We present experimental evidence on the impact of a school choice program in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh (AP) that provided students with a voucher to finance attending a private school of

The available empirical evidence on these private school choice programs makes it clear they positively affect the academic performance of participating students, while doing so at a lower cost than public schools and benefitting public school students, decreasing segregation, and improving civic values and practices.

It does so despite the preponderance of evidence that, as the authors of one educational study from 2002 wrote, «school choice, on average, does not produce the equity and social justice that proponents spin.»