For more on PIP coverage, check out our earlier posts including Can Your Florida Insurance Company Demand
Examination Under Oath for PIP Benefits After a Florida Car Crash?
(1.3) The insurer shall make reasonable efforts to schedule
the examination under oath for a time and location that are convenient for the person and shall give the person reasonable advance notice of the following:
Not exact matches
The process of an
examination under oath can feel intimidating, but the insurance company isn't working to make things difficult
for you.
While each party is questioned by the other party's lawyer, and the answers are given
under oath,
examination for discovery is not in itself a trial.
Before I became aware of the
under oath requirement
for interrogatory answers — and therefore typically received and accepted answers that were not
under oath — a response to such cross
examination questions regarding interrogatory answers would be met with «those are my attorney's answers, not mine,» or even «those are my attorney's answers; I never saw them,» the inference being that the opposing party had no responsibility
for these answers.
(1.1) If requested by the insurer, a person who applies
for a benefit
under this Regulation as a result of an accident shall submit to an
examination under oath, but is not required to,
The
Examination for Discovery, for example, is an oral pre-trial examination under oath of each of the parties to t
Examination for Discovery,
for example, is an oral pre-trial
examination under oath of each of the parties to t
examination under oath of each of the parties to the lawsuit.
(9) Clause (2)(a) shall not be interpreted as prohibiting an additional
examination of the applicant
under oath,
under Ontario Regulation 283/95 (Disputes Between Insurers) made
under the Act, at the insurer's request that is conducted
for the purpose of determining who is liable
under section 268 of the Act to pay statutory accident benefits in respect of the accident.
Re request
for discovery - Should the Applicant be compelled to submit to an
Examination Under Oath?
Reasons
for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, finding that a witness who is willing to communicate through counsel should not be compelled to attend a pre-trial
examination under oath.
Examination for discovery allows a party in a civil case to examine,
under oath, the opposing party orally before trial.
The process of an
examination under oath can feel intimidating, but the insurance company isn't working to make things difficult
for you.