Sentences with phrase «exxon knew about climate»

Amid a year - long probe, state investigators seek documents on what Exxon knew about climate change and what it told shareholders and the public.

While investigators have been looking into what Exxon knew about climate change and what it said about it to the public and shareholders for some time, recent investigative news reports by InsideClimate News and the Los Angeles Times made the issue «more ripe,» the person said.

New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman's office seek documents on what Exxon knew about climate change and what it told shareholders and the public.

The oil company Exxon knew about climate change's impact in the 1970s, and found out that action would impact their bottom line.

Nor will I spend much time rehashing the recent reports from Inside Climate News, the LA Times, the New York Times or the Guardian that recount what Exxon knew about climate change and what they did to promote doubt and delay climate policy in recent years.

Investigative reports revealed Exxon knew about climate change as far back as the 1970s, yet the company's executives chose to embark on a decades - long campaign of deception.

Not exact matches

Republicans on a congressional science committee are asking state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman to fork over a number of records related to his probe of climate change and what Exxon Mobil may have known about its effects on the environment.

«Given the overwhelming evidence that Exxon Mobil knew the facts about climate change but chose to mislead the public and their investors through a massive campaign of climate denial, we strongly support NYS lawmakers taking action to hold them accountable, «Lipton said.

Exxon's oil industry peers knew about climate dangers in the 1970s, too.

However, since a high proportion of misnamed «skeptics» are in fact deliberate liars, who endlessly repeat assertions that they well know have been repeatedly shown to be false, it will probably have little effect on the fake, phony, Exxon - Mobil sponsored «debate» about anthropogenic climate change.

And as long as businessmen with a vested interest (Exxon / Mobil, Peabody Coal, power companies), and economists with a political bias (CEI, Heartland, Cato, Wall Street), and lawyers (Bachmann, Cornyn, Cantor) believe that they know more about global warming than climate scientists, nothing will get done to combat global warming.

When news broke, whether it was the wreck of the Exxon Valdez or the release of a new report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, there was a decent chance someone who knew about oil toxicity or the heat - trapping properties of CO2 would report the story.

Exxon spokesman Ken Cohen either misunderstood or misrepresented the chart pictured above as he pushed back against an InsideClimate News investigation into what Exxon's own scientists knew about the emerging risks of climate change, and when they knew it.

InsideClimate News (ICN) has insisted over and over that the Rockefeller Brothers Fund (RBF) and the Rockefeller Family Fund (RFF), which have been bankrolling the entire #ExxonKnew campaign, have absolutely no editorial authority over the stories they publish, including the series they released last year proclaiming that Exxon «knew» about climate change in the 1970s before climate scientists even understood the data.

That set the research clock at Exxon even further back, to a time when few people outside small scientific circles knew or cared about climate change.

Exxon has known all there is to know about climate change for four decades.

Exxon spokesman Ken Cohen either misunderstood or misrepresented his selected chart the other day as he pushed back against an InsideClimate News investigation into what Exxon's own scientists knew about the emerging risks of climate change, and when they knew it.

For decades Exxon and their fossil fuel industry peers covered up how much they knew about climate change.

«The American people deserve answers from executives at Exxon about what they knew about the impact of burning fossil fuels on our climate, when they knew it, and what they told their investors and the world,» Healey said.

It's made more hideous by the fact that it could have been prevented, had Exxon and its ilk simply told the truth about climate change when they knew it,» 350.org's senior advisor and co-founder Bill McKibben said in a statement.

Since then, InsideClimate News published an exposé detailing a $ 30 million, multi-decade effort by Exxon Mobil to sow doubt about climate change, despite the company's own internal deliberations about known climate risks associated with fossil fuel use.

«Exxon Knew Everything There Was to Know About Climate Change by the Mid-1980s — and Denied It,» by Bill McKibben, The Nation, October 20, 2015.

The 106 - page complaint sketches a timeline of what Exxon knew about the risks fossil fuels pose to the climate, starting in the 1970s.

In the meantime Exxon, now known as ExxonMobil, appears to have kept its years of climate - related deliberations about Natuna mostly to itself.

My prior blog post detailed a particular set of «narrative derailment» problems surrounding Naomi Oreskes, who was in the news a few weeks ago regarding her consultation with New York state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman about the «Exxon Knew» story before a climate news outlet broke out the story.

«Yet Exxon funded and publicly engaged in a campaign to deceive the American people about the known risks of fossil fuels in causing climate change.

In addition to concealing the known risks, Exxon and Suncor... directed, participated in, and benefited from efforts to misleadingly cast doubt about the causes and consequences of climate change, including: (1) making affirmative and misleading statements suggesting that continued and unabated fossil fuel use was safe (in spite of internal knowledge to the contrary); and (2) attacking climate science and scientists that tried to report truthfully about the dangers of climate change.

«In this case, Exxon scientists knew about fossil fuels causing global warming and Exxon took internal actions based on its knowledge of climate change,» according to DeSaulnier and Lieu's letter.

page 6, on the «Exxon Knew» insinuation: No mention is made of Exxon's forceful statement about the Inside Climate News organization selectively choosing information, and careful reading of actual Exxon documents (e.g. this one) shows Exxon people questioning the validity of models predicting future climate condClimate News organization selectively choosing information, and careful reading of actual Exxon documents (e.g. this one) shows Exxon people questioning the validity of models predicting future climate condclimate conditions.

But late Tuesday night, Harvard history professor Naomi Oreskes and her colleague Geoffrey Supran published a report conceding that #ExxonKnew was never really about what Exxon «knew,» but instead was focused on punishing the company for arguing against specific climate policy proposals.

Ahead of a Congressional hearing held by House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R - TX), members of Congress, law experts, and environmental groups gathered at the Capitol to highlight all that Exxon knew and buried about climate change, and to push back on the Chairman's overreaching subpoenas.

Ahead of a Congressional hearing held by House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R - TX), members of Congress, law experts, and environmental groups gathered at the Capitol to highlight all that Exxon knew and buried about climate change, and to push back on the Chairman's overreaching...