Environmental groups have claimed for years that
ExxonMobil knew about climate change in the 1970s, but then worked to suppress their own findings.
The EELI's request was in retaliation to recent investigations by state attorneys general into how much
ExxonMobil knew about climate change while simultaneously denying its existence.
Bell is writing with reference to the recent investigations by state attorneys general into how much
ExxonMobil knew about climate change while it was denying it existence publicly and to shareholders.
The groups, ranging from the [Rockefeller Brothers Fund - supported] 350.org, Food and Water Watch, Climate Parents, Moms Clean Air Force, The Nation, Sierra Club and others, have asked DOJ to investigate what
ExxonMobil knew about climate change and when the company knew it, juxtaposing that insider knowledge, exposed by both InsideClimate News and the Los Angeles Times, with the climate change denial campaign it funded both in the past and through to the present.»
The groups, ranging from the [Rockefeller Brothers Fund - supported] 350.org, Food and Water Watch, The Nation, Sierra Club and others, have asked DOJ to investigate what
ExxonMobil knew about climate change and when the company knew it, juxtaposing that insider knowledge, exposed by both InsideClimate News and the Los Angeles Times, with the climate change denial campaign it funded both in the past and through to the present.
After it was revealed that New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman's office is investigating what oil giant
ExxonMobil knew about climate change compared to what it told the public and investors, reaction poured in quickly.
Not exact matches
AG Eric Schneiderman has shot down a request from Republican members of a congressional committee that he turn over a number of records related to an investigation into
climate change and what
ExxonMobil may have
known about its effects on the environment.
Last September, Inside
Climate News revealed that ExxonMobil knew about the impacts of manmade climate change in the 1970s» and «80s yet went on to fund numerous climate denial e
Climate News revealed that
ExxonMobil knew about the impacts of manmade
climate change in the 1970s» and «80s yet went on to fund numerous climate denial e
climate change in the 1970s» and «80s yet went on to fund numerous
climate denial e
climate denial efforts.
«(T) wo Rockefeller family foundations have been involved in an advocacy campaign that accuses
ExxonMobil of covering up what it
knew about climate change....
It would also immunize fossil - fuel companies from lawsuits for damages done by their products — lawsuits such as those bound to arise from the revelations that
ExxonMobil and other companies
knew for decades
about the
climate damages their products cause, and lied
about it.
«
ExxonMobil, the world's largest and most powerful oil company,
knew everything there was to
know about climate change by the mid-1980s, and then spent the next few decades systematically funding
climate denial and lying
about the state of the science.»
ExxonMobil, now also the subject of U.S. congressional and activist group calls for a U.S. Department of Justice investigation,
knew about the risks of
climate change since the 1970s and studied those risks internally for decades.
In the meantime Exxon, now
known as
ExxonMobil, appears to have kept its years of
climate - related deliberations
about Natuna mostly to itself.
In closing, the amendment lends support to the ongoing state Attorneys General investigations in both New York and California into what
ExxonMobil and other fossil fuel interests
knew, and when,
about climate change risks and why the industry chose instead to attack the science to prolong its profits.
In fact, right now Attorneys General in multiple states have active investigations into what
ExxonMobil knew and when
about the scientific research on
climate change and whether the company actively worked to undermine what they
knew to be true.