Sentences with phrase «ffp because»

No mate you failed FFP because» a number of secondary sponsorship deals which were considered to be above fair market values.»

i blame Michel UEFA Platini that shi7 who parity much done away with FFP because he said that the EPL is too strong and relaxing the FFP rules will help other leagues but fail to see only one off teams in other leagues are making a killing and the rest of that league are just suffering, and not forgetting gazumping players sale price and salaries gone through the roof,

Lastly Chelsea have one of the best youth development squads in the league, it is exactly how they avoid the FFP because they make so much player sales off young players not to mention there is a clause that money spent on youth development is exempt from analysis in the FFP

Not exact matches

But it's no surprise because the same man who frowns upon this, also had complete faith in the FFP rules and how the City's, Chelsea's and Barcelona's would be so knee deep in debt and restrictions by now, they would be able to pull off any sort of shenanigans and Arsenal would be the knights in shining armor at the top of the food chain!

«When Manchester City pays off 50 millions of fine because they exceeded the FFP, I think it's unfair.

We have way over 200m profits spread here and there, we can match PSG or City this window because FFP will look at your books every two years so with next years expected profits we can match anyone in Europe, but it's rediculous to think two players can cost more than a club in the bottom half of the EPL I would think twice before I pay over 100M only if it guarantees me CL title

We may well be, but if ffp does get relaxed (because poor oligarchs can't buy teams and «invest» to turn them into world class outfits or because sky pays the premier league so much that the «others» are disadvantaged) then it will be the «whole package», transfer fees and wages that spiral up.

Over 30 yrs old contract extension from performance is justified by the ffp regulations because youngster development and promotion is a big part of clubs future stability.

Don't make spence AW reacently said that because of the new relaxing of the FFP rooks (thanks to F, ink platini) we can not commpeet with City or Chelsea in the transfer market because they have more spending power then us,

Too bad there can't be control of it because FFP is a joke.

I laughed yesterday when I read Mourhinho saying that City should have had their PL title taken away because they breached ffp!

Silly me for thinking that their under spending now was happening because they stock piled platers pre FFP so that they could start selling players like Mata and buy Magic.

There have been some suggestions that Valencia were not in a strong bargaining position themselves, though, because of their financial situation and now Metro has reported that one of the club's chiefs has admitted this and prepared their fans for the departure of at least one of their players in order to comply with the FFP rules.

Secondly, earlier this week Maureen said Man City should have been stripped of last seasons league title, because they had breached ffp!

City have them on bonus related contracts because of FFP.

Isn't FFP suppose to draw everyone in line or are we suppose to be at a disadvantage at every transfer because our books are balanced.

It is not down to Arsenal just to buy a player... the selling club has to a) want to sell b) agree a price and c) ensure they have someone else to replace who they are selling Additionally because of FFP and Home - Grown rules it does nt make sense to buy all your players and then suddenly you could get 2 - 3 major injuries and have to buy someone else but then cant because you have no monies or might have to sell someone to be able to do so So many people saying negative things and that we should just go and buy and yet at the same time why spend so much on someone when we could have got somebody else!

Buying the league is the worst thing they can do because when VanGaal leaves they will have to rebuild from scratch and spend another 100m, FFP won't allow it to happen like they're currently doing with Man City

Falcao is an example some may look to, but he's loaned out because under FFP, Monaco can't afford to pay him the wages that are in his contract, at least that was what I was told.

L'Equipe state that the senior official explained that Anthony Martial's move to Manchester United in 2015 was sanctioned because of Financial Fair Play (FFP) reasons in order to be «safe and sound» but the lub had moree freedom as to whether to let Lemar go or not.

my problem with AW is that for years he resisted to buy good players because of a million or two difference from asking price today's market those players are worth triple, we could of had a great team with possibly wining the EPL twice and possibly semis or final of CL, if he had just spent the money in the bank, Chelsea are in dept around 850 Million pounds (possible the bulk to Abromovich) and same for Man - United and few more, we are the only club that is cash rich with funds available around hidden 350 million and more accumulating every season, how i know this because i look at their end of year accounts outgoings and income there is around 100 to 120 million less outgoings then income, we can easily spend 700 Million in the summer and we will be well in with FFP rules and only have 350m to pay in two years which we can with bigger and higher sponsorship coming any day now

Because of FFP, even che and city rained it in a little compared to what we were used to seeing.

Also on the FFP rules, it's funny how the reasoning behind essentially scrapping them was because the Premier League TV deal would have given English teams an advantage in the Champions League.

The club were desperate for FFP to level the playing field, now they're in danger of breaking the wage rule because we're over-paying a shower of mediocrity.

Although our aggregate, FFP - adjusted losses are outside the $ 45m required, the transitional relief for wages paid on contracts signed prior to June 2010 (which is # 80m in City's case) will see us escape any sanction because that's what it says in Annex XI of the FFP regulations.

Last week the tubby Martin Samuel who is usually worth a read started to lash out against Man Yoo, Liverpool and us because we tried to stop Manchester City driving a London bus through FFP closely followed by the Chavs from the Bus Stop in West London.

So they've basically said there is an «option» on bringing him in permanently, but they won't say «the loan will become permanent» because if they did then they'd be in FFP bother.

«Since Michel Platini left UEFA, FFP has lost one of its biggest defenders because we must verify and control where financing comes from.»

«We need to box a little bit clever because of FFP,» said Bruce.

«Avoiding unnecessary FFP transfusion is important because there have been reports that associated the use of excess FFP with worse outcomes among patients that required less - than - massive transfusions.»