«As a result, in line with
FFP sanctions, MCFC were fined # 49 million» Technically incorrect, # 49m of future CL income was withheld and split over three seasons.
As a result, in line with
FFP sanctions, MCFC were fined # 49 million and forced to limit its Champions League squad to only 21 players.
Only Man City and PSG have
FFP sanctions I think.
Chelsea boss Mourinho recently whinged publicly about Manchester City spending # 28m on Wilfried Bony, despite having been hit with
FFP sanctions last summer.
Not exact matches
City too clearly have the ability to
sanction a deal for Messi, but after already falling foul of
FFP in the past know what a negative effect it can have.
Normally, with the amount of money available to them, getting a player from the French champions would only be possible for Arsenal if they were keen on selling, but it seems as though the
FFP rules and
sanctions from UEFA may be starting to bite on PSG a little bit, which may be why the manager Laurent Bland has revealed, in a Metro report, that there is little he can do to stop the club selling Rabiot.
Falcao is a player who can certainly do just that and with his Ligue 1 side keen to
sanction a sale, possibly via an initial loan deal, to help the principality side adhere to UEFA's
FFP (Financial Fair Play) guidelines a move away from the Stade Louis II seems plausible.
FIFA, UEFA, the FA... PSG are laughing at you... they have blatantly broken the
FFP rules now they are openly breaking the tapping up rules, unless Arsenal have
sanctioned it, in which case AW is lying to us....
L'Equipe state that the senior official explained that Anthony Martial's move to Manchester United in 2015 was
sanctioned because of Financial Fair Play (
FFP) reasons in order to be «safe and sound» but the lub had moree freedom as to whether to let Lemar go or not.
Free - spending French giants Paris Saint - Germain are set to face UEFA
sanctions for breaches of Financial Fair Play (
FFP), according to a report by the Financial Times on Wednesday that claims PSG «overstated» sponsorship contracts to the tune of 200 million euros.
It is highly unlikely that UEFA will apply any serious
sanctions in the first year, as long as they have some assurance that the club is likely to comply with
FFP in the near future.
Although our aggregate,
FFP - adjusted losses are outside the $ 45m required, the transitional relief for wages paid on contracts signed prior to June 2010 (which is # 80m in City's case) will see us escape any
sanction because that's what it says in Annex XI of the
FFP regulations.
What is clear is that unless a breach of the
FFP rules occurs no
sanction will be applied, which other clubs could agree with or not.
The re-written
FFP rules say that if a club fails to meet
FFP regulations and then offer to do a deal with Uefa then any directly affected party (which I guess means any other club in the same league that might qualify for Europe, or any club in any other country that is playing in Europe) can appeal against the attempt by the club come to an arrangement with Uefa to mitigate their
sanction in a plea bargain.
To have a
sanction imposed the club would have had to fail the
FFP test in such a way that a
sanction was deemed appropriate.
April 12 — Paris St - Germain are facing fresh accusations of failing to meet financial fair play (
FFP) regulations with officials set to meet with UEFA in an effort to stave off being
sanctioned again, according to reports.
«They stopped that'd deal from happening, secured Mbappe and got an agreement with Monaco in which they would take the player on loan with a compulsory buy option for next season, which shifts the cost of the transfer fee one year on and avoid
FFP (
sanctions) and announce the transfer.»
Now, under
FFP, if they exceed losses of 30m Euros (# 23.5 m) over a three - year period that includes the present campaign, they are liable to be
sanctioned by Uefa.