Sentences with phrase «ffp so»

After Wenger campaigned for FFP so strongly, how ironic would it be if it bit us harder than it did the financial dopers.

Silly me for thinking that their under spending now was happening because they stock piled platers pre FFP so that they could start selling players like Mata and buy Magic.

Not exact matches

But it's no surprise because the same man who frowns upon this, also had complete faith in the FFP rules and how the City's, Chelsea's and Barcelona's would be so knee deep in debt and restrictions by now, they would be able to pull off any sort of shenanigans and Arsenal would be the knights in shining armor at the top of the food chain!

Lastly Chelsea have one of the best youth development squads in the league, it is exactly how they avoid the FFP because they make so much player sales off young players not to mention there is a clause that money spent on youth development is exempt from analysis in the FFP

I cant imagine he will leave for the same type of money that they bought him for as with ffp rules and his scoring these days being very good for a winger but not so much for main striker and also people will be looking at Falcaos case.

No real risk of FFP as we have been so good with money recently...

So even without the relaxing of the FFP rules, Arsene Wenger is still likely to have a smaller transfer budget than our big Premier League rivals and with Chelsea and the Manchester clubs also able to offer the lure of Champions League football, our manager will be hoping that his transfer targets are not the same.

We have way over 200m profits spread here and there, we can match PSG or City this window because FFP will look at your books every two years so with next years expected profits we can match anyone in Europe, but it's rediculous to think two players can cost more than a club in the bottom half of the EPL I would think twice before I pay over 100M only if it guarantees me CL title

The Old Trafford side will look to fund moves in the transfer moves with cash made from the sales of players so as to better adhere to UEFA FFP (Financial Fair Play) guidelines, with van Gaal having already brought in young attacker Memphis Depay in a # 25m deal earlier this summer.

We may well be, but if ffp does get relaxed (because poor oligarchs can't buy teams and «invest» to turn them into world class outfits or because sky pays the premier league so much that the «others» are disadvantaged) then it will be the «whole package», transfer fees and wages that spiral up.

Heck, I would sweeten the deal to ensure he goes out the EPL by paying money and giving Alexis to PSG, enough so they can afford his wages without FFP sniffing around.

FFP can make the difference, Chelsea will want to recoup # # # so they can spend more, we all know Jose can only buy talent so he will need the cash.

The Blues will no doubt be a tough nut to crack again, especially as the easing of the FFP rules means that they can spend big money to strengthen an already strong squad, but I am not so worried about our other rivals for a number of reasons.

and why can a country buy a player then to loan them on the cheap to their football clubs so not to be punished under the rule of FFP

Arsenal has beaten lyon in six pre-seasons so a win to them does nt mean anything.Infact its concern that giroud cant score hatrick against lethergic lyon where youngstars scored.Utd beat barca, Ings is banging hatricks for liverpool, this mean wenger agenda of youth policy and ffp has caused us 10 boring yrs without title, utd have effectively bought the league and wenger money is in bank he wants to make is players happy, hope will also be happy

Premier League Is Officially Awful: English Teams Lose 9 - 5 In Terrible Week Of European Fixtures Liverpool Avoid FFP Punishment, But Premier League Rivals Not So Lucky

I didn't even expect them to even do anything to PSG, so even a financial penalty would be surprising but if they smacked them witha CL suspension I would actually believe that FFP is something more than a way for the rich clubs to stay on top.

They have released (transfer / loan) many high wages players --(Nani, Kagawa, Evra, Ferdinand and still releasing more (Zaha, etc) So they are financially ok to buy good stuffs without fouling FFP rules.

(So much for FFP — it is a joke).

On the subject of FFP Wenger needs to realise that bringing in these big players does also bring in a lot of revenue as MU are finding out with Falcao, so that offsets the cost somewhat.

The bad part of FFP was this — clubs that spent huge amounts of cash a few years back got in under the wire and will not necessarily be hurt so much by FFP.

PSG are also keen on Pogba and City know that any big money move would have to be balanced with player sales so as to adhere to UEFA's FFP (Financial Fair Play) guidelines.

Well YES and NO now we have the FFP in place so it's even again in fact we should come on top becouse we have gone through the pain of building the next generation stadium and new lucrative sponsership unlike nearly all of the EPL clubs, my reason for AW to step aside is becouse his not upgrading his always trying to make do, we the Arsenal want to fight the war and not the battle.

It is not down to Arsenal just to buy a player... the selling club has to a) want to sell b) agree a price and c) ensure they have someone else to replace who they are selling Additionally because of FFP and Home - Grown rules it does nt make sense to buy all your players and then suddenly you could get 2 - 3 major injuries and have to buy someone else but then cant because you have no monies or might have to sell someone to be able to do so So many people saying negative things and that we should just go and buy and yet at the same time why spend so much on someone when we could have got somebody elsso So many people saying negative things and that we should just go and buy and yet at the same time why spend so much on someone when we could have got somebody elsSo many people saying negative things and that we should just go and buy and yet at the same time why spend so much on someone when we could have got somebody elsso much on someone when we could have got somebody else!

Gil was sold by Valencia so the club would be able to comply with FFP and, at 22, could become a major hit at Villa Park.

«In 2015 we had to sell in order to meet FFP conditions, so it was more of an obligation.

@Leo where have you been man Platini abolished FFP to help French League over EPL he said it wasn't fare that all the English teams get so much money from TV rights

i was disappointed that FFP rules have just gone out of the window and we can thank Platini for that just so he can help PSG now look according to Budd they have already offered 125 million euros for Ronaldo who is next Sanchez Messi??

Oh that FFP That part of your argument is a waste of your words as it is no longer FIFA policy to enforce it as it is not in any way viable to do so and would also expose a great deal more of the inherent corruption in the FIFA machinery.

Ancelotti is lying so they can get bigger transfer fees they just spent 100mil so they need to sell Di Maria and Khedira to balance the books FFP is in full force!

If it wasn't for FIFA FFP, I would think a move to Man City was on the cards, so we could go head - to - head with Chelsea for his signature.

PSG didn't spend 400 mill on 2 players couldn't afford Mbappé that's the reason for the loan, so Pep is still talking shit.What I've read whether true or not, PSG will have to sell players to sign Mbappé to avoid FFP violations.As i said yesterday this is what i can't get my head around why City can keep spending when revenue to expenditure simply doesn't add up.

FFP measures spending over a three year period and doesn't take full effect until 2015 anyway so one year's spending isn't going to be critical and dramatic decisions are unlikely to be taken this summer.

Mike, it's none of my business how other football clubs are run — over the past 150 years or so prior to FFP, there has been nothing set in stone as to the right or wrong way to run a football club.

Firstly, FFP won't allow for it and secondly, with the squad we have now it won't be necessary, so what we'll see is a more moderate net spend each season and much less player churn.

We've started a Kickstarter campaign titled «Help Pay Manchester City's # 50 million FFP Fine So That Sheikh Mansour Can Continue Spending Money On Super Great Players This Summer».

So called FFP aims to maintain the status quo and do nothing about massive debts while blocking real investment.

How do clubs with massive debts escape attention, when the so - called intention of FFP was to stop clubs getting into financial difficulties?

So they've basically said there is an «option» on bringing him in permanently, but they won't say «the loan will become permanent» because if they did then they'd be in FFP bother.

The financial accounts released earlier this year include figures up to 31st May 2013 so they should of known about the improved commercial and retail sales at the time of the claims of FFP restrictions.

At the Pusan International Film Festival FFP Lab project HI - SO by Aditya Assarat will have its World Premiere in competition.

I think that is the case today with TD and CIBC that they 100 % of the FFP points cost so the Gold level cards will probably take a haircut (whilst Signature, Infinite and World Elite should stay the same).