Sentences with phrase «fact book does»

In his recap of last week's action a spokesman for one offshore shop talks about the fact his book did not follow the move on the Notre Dame @ Tennessee game:

The fact your books do so well shows you're right in the groove there with the right length scifi novel.

Not exact matches

Digital books made up about 20 % of the market last year, roughly the same as they did a few years ago, a fact that has traditional publishers almost gloating.

In fact, imploring leaders to spread praise around (which Goldsmith does in his book) is lousy advice for many women.

«You can learn every sales trick in the book but nothing will ever mask the fact that you don't believe in your own product or service.»

The fact that you can access it doesn't solve that fundamental problem,» Fraser Howie, an independent analyst and the author of several books on China's financial system, told CNBC's «Street Signs.»

Because as much as Gossip the book is about the popularization of back - fence talk and the search for a reason why one of the world's most compelling pastimes is so pleasurable, it's also about admitting that people just can't keep secrets; they don't want to, and we might as well embrace the fact that they'll keep fewer and fewer in the future unless we collectively settle on some new etiquette.

I wrote several books and a lot of articles, and brands did in fact become the backbone of our success.

Consider these five tips for making a graceful exit from Bill McBean, author of the recent book The Facts of Business Life: What Every Successful Business Owner Knows That You Don't, published by Wiley.

In fact, he even wrote a book of the same title: The Behavior Gap: Simple Ways to Stop Doing Dump Things With Money.

For those who have constantly followed updates on this business blog, you will come to acknowledge the fact that I don't review books until I have read and...

Ann Carey's 1997 book, Sisters in Crisis, reported a hard fact, thoroughly supported by the data: Progressive orders of religious women don't generate new vocations.

Jackson's memoir and other recent books don't just deliver the hard facts on football - induced brain and body damage.

Yeah Christians don't seem to get the fact that radical Islam's foundation is in their own Holy Book, the Bible.

«sensible Austin, we don't know what christ did, we just have partial accounts of his life wriiten decades after the supposed facts in a book written by anybody's guess that contains myths and fairytales.

Considering that story wasnt even created until a few hundred years after the supposed «ressurection», and the fact that the story exists only in your fable book (also compiled, and edited hundreds of years later), I do nt think claiming it to be true is the same as, you know, being true.

Beyond that simple fact, recognition of the totalitarian syndrome of the communist system did not take place during the wartime period when the book was being written; such recognition came about after the Second World War was long over.

Austin, we don't know what christ did, we just have partial accounts of his life wriiten decades after the supposed facts in a book written by anybody's guess that contains myths and fairytales.

Buddhism (in its true form) provides a guide to the elimination of suffering, not deity worship; in fact never talks about God or gods in the sense the west does... FYI Buddha was born 630 years before Jesus, and it is proven that Buddhism traveled from eastern India all the way to Syria and the Middle East via the Silk Road... i am quite sure Jesus had heard some of his teachings... some of the things that Jesus says are a direct reflection of the eightfold path from buddhism... Jesus was the greatest salesman of all time... sold the most books in history... he really honestly does nt deserve worship but an Academy Award

On the question of fascism, however, the facts of Gadamer's career under the Nazis (covered by a quarter of the book) do not lead us to any dramatic or even noteworthy conclusions.

Don't misunderstand me; some evolutionists (particularly some of the neo-atheists like Richard Dawkins, who argues in his new book people who don't believe in evolution are on the same level as Holocaust deniers) have gone ape over their theory (forgive the pun) to the point that they seem to forget it is a theory, and refer to it as if it is an undeniable scientific fact.

But nowhere does he even mention the fact that in other important sections the book evaluates work of the American Catholic Bishops, statements from several mainline Protestant churches, and publications of M. Douglas Meeks, Max Stackhouse, Richard John Neuhaus, Michael Novak, and several civil rights reformers, including Jesse Jackson.

If, on the other hand, he somehow got a glimpse of the fact that I am calling for a biblically grounded and distinctive Christian political philosophy, then he should have seen that I do not merely «come precariously close» to trying to do such a thing; that is precisely what the book is about.

Check out this link to find out about marriage to young girls claim.Very very interesting to know.I hope everyone has the patience to study history and reality of life centuries ago worldwide.This video also gives you references to online history books about facts it says.Simply, the average age of marriage was very young worldwide including church approved age of consent to marry.What Mohamed did, was very common back in the days and just to let you know, that girl was engaged to another man and then the engagement was broken due to his disbelief which tells you that that was common back in the days.Also, the age of 6 mentioned was age of engagement not age of marriage.marriage happened a few years later.

Grondin has done substantial archival work to settle what the book's jacket calls «the facts of Gadamer's life»: upbringing, schooling, teachers, degrees, appointments, major publications, and other signal events (Gadamer's early illness, his two marriages, his arrest by East German police).

Interestingly enough, nor in that book, nor in any other books I have read about the period, is it mentioned the fact that in the say 10 - 20 years following that moment, did this «evil church cult of the dammed rubble rubble rubble» engage in anything except spread the Word.

historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...

That I sometimes refer to Professor Graffin's PhD Thesis and books when talking about evolution may have something to do with the fact that it is directly related to the field of evolutionary biology.

Maybe you might want to read a science book one day, they do a good job of proving things with FACTS, something your god hypothesis is sorely lacking in.

Even Dawkins did not intelligently debate this fact, all he did in his delusional «God Delusion» book was to say that the resurrection was ridiculous.

Fact: Every holy book is filled with commands to kill all innocent people who do not share that religion.

In fact, one of the more constructive criticisms I've heard from the complementarian camp is that, in the book, I did not make clear enough distinctions between how various complementarian organizations differ in their positions on biblical womanhood.

In fact, I have tried to keep silent on certain issues over the years, but the problem, or maybe I should say the benefit, of teaching through books of the Bible the way I do, is that I can not avoid certain issues for long.

It would be pleasant to think that the new approach on boys» books - reflecting a genuine panic over the fact that boys lag behind girls in reading, and have been doing so at an increasing rate for these three decades - shows a fresh determination to base future educational policies on truth.

The metaphor of moving a mountain as it relates to doing the work of peace - making and justice - seeking since my first visit to Haiti crops up often in my life and work — in fact, I ended up dedicating an entire chapter of my book to this beautiful idea).

It's the fact that you keep spewing the same old rhetoric from the same out - dated book and don't care about true evidence.

I do want to add here some basic facts, the article the following is taken from is using facts from the past decade not from 2000 years ago... these facts are what matter now, not that book written by sheep herding men who probably enjoyed the company of their herd (thus the term bestiality??)

She could write a new book and prove me wrong... but I do not think she is in it for the facts.

Grab a science book and read up on how earthquakes and hurricanes happen, believe it or not, there is evidence (facts — if you don't know what evidence is) that explains how these natural disasters happen, and no magical being in the clouds is in the formula.

In fact, I'll go further - fathers, do please get this book, because your parishioners will benefit, and you will be able to take the credit for doing good work.

We know for a fact that all religious books are false and therefore, the gods described by those stories do not exist.

The fact that the Pope chose now to write a book reporting this does not mean that he only now came to understand this, despite any Christian bashing that Jehovah Witnesses may conduct.

Church planting books are being cranked out like romance novels — lots of promises and passion, but little facts on what does and what doesn't help church plants succeed.

You say the book of Mormon has been altered 1000 times... wow, where do you get this and other facts from?

Once you get through the deception and their crazy no - fact doctrine based on book where it's history has been proven false due to the lack of DNA and Archeological evidence that does not support the BOOK OF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to lebook where it's history has been proven false due to the lack of DNA and Archeological evidence that does not support the BOOK OF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leBOOK OF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leave.

«There could be single cases that can be justified, for instance when a prostitute uses a condom, and this can be a first step towards a moralization, a first assumption of responsibility, to develop again the awareness of the fact that not all is allowed and that one can not do everything one wants,» Benedict says in the book, «Light of the World: The Pope, the Church, and the Signs of the Times.»

In fact, if they were living in sinful rebellion against God, we would expect God to pour out his judgment upon them in the book as he has always done in times past, but instead, as we will see, God pours out blessing and honor upon the Israelites, instead of judgment and destruction.

In my book on Chile, I was trying to hold up examples of what was in fact done, both by the bishops and by the grassroots church, to break the hold of the state on people's imagination.

You don't have enough king James scripture verses in it for any Christian publisher to be interested in putting it out (I've talked to Christian agents about this, and they are as frustrated as the writers at how boxed in to rigid rules Christian books have to be) and that is a sad fact about book publishing today.

But the argument that Professor Smolin attributes to Arkes is nowhere in the book; and what Arkes does argue for never appears in Prof. Smolin's review — in fact, Smolin writes as if he is oblivious to it.