Sentences with phrase «fairly valued markets»

Fairly valued markets get overvalued; overvalued markets can turn into bubbles.

The current P / E ratio of Sensex is in the range of 22 - 23, which means the market indeed is overvalued since the P / E of a fairly valued market is around 17 - 19.

Not exact matches

And paid fairly, based on the value of their work in a free market, not a market distorted by special interest loopholes and exemptions.

Today, the market is at 19.5, which means that for the market to be fairly valued it would have to hit 1,620.

In our view, many other markets are less expensive, but more fairly valued on a historical basis and will need to see a significant pickup in earnings growth to continue their run.

The recent market dive has really brought GE into fairly valued territory.

While we currently favour global exposure to the technology sector and selected opportunities within healthcare, we're also positive on financials — another giant within the Canadian market cap that we believe registers as fairly valued with the potential for decent earnings growth amid a synchronized and sustained global economic expansion.

DLR is trading at P / E ratio of 28.30 with an excellent dividend yield of 5.90 % and Market Cap of $ 7.67 B. It's 52 week high was $ 65.43 and currently trading at $ 56.66, almost 13.5 % lower and fairly valued.

A reading of 100 % suggests the markets are fairly valued.

I think the private markets at this point are valued based on fairly different metrics from public markets.

Now, finally, the stock market is fairly - valued for conditions of low inflation and low interest rates (assuming average long - term economic growth in the future).

And every stock market, in hindsight, is seen as «fairly valued» when it suffers no panic and slowly appreciates as it's supposed to do.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

It is our opinion that the public market for retail stocks is contributing to a risky and inhospitable environment under which the stock price of Barnes & Noble may not fairly reflect its intrinsic value anytime in the foreseeable future if it remains a stand - alone company.

It is our opinion that the public market for retail stocks is contributing to a risky and inhospitable environment under which the stock price of Barnes & Noble may not fairly reflect its intrinsic value anytime in the foreseeable future if it remains a stand - alone company,» Sandell said in the letter sent to the bookseller's board of directors.

In contrast, equity markets in Europe, Japan and emerging markets appear somewhere between fairly valued and relatively inexpensive.

The housing market is also doing fairly well and home sales have increased rapidly as more people begin to see the value in Virginia real estate.

In contrast, I've often quoted the Shiller P / E (which essentially uses a 10 - year average of inflation - adjusted earnings) as a simple but historically informative alternative, but I should emphasize that we strongly prefer our standard methodologies based on earnings, forward earnings, dividends and other fundamentals, all which have a fairly tight relationship with subsequent 7 - 10 year total returns (see Lessons from a Lost Decade, The Likely Range of Market Returns in the Coming Decade, Valuing the S&P 500 Using Forward Operating Earnings, and No Margin of Safety, No Room for Error).

This indicates the market is fairly valued.

Since a company's book value represents the shareholding worth, comparing book value with market value of the shares can serve as an effective valuation technique when trying to decide whether shares are fairly priced.

While equity market volatility certainly increased around year - end and has carried over into the New Year, global equity markets aside from a few market segments (oil & gas, mining, certain emerging markets) remain fairly to fully valued, and in some instances overvalued from our perspective.

With that being said, I don't believe the market is extremely overvalued, but somewhere above fairly valued.

While we currently favour global exposure to the technology sector and selected opportunities within healthcare, we're also positive on financials — another giant within the Canadian market cap that we believe registers as fairly valued with the potential for decent earnings growth amid a synchronized and sustained global economic expansion.

Conclusion: As long as the company receives full market value for new shares, you are fairly compensated for giving up ownership in the company.

Market value ratios help evaluate the economic status of publicly traded companies and can play a role in identifying stocks that may be overvalued, undervalued, or priced fairly.

The market seems to value this 3PL company fairly.

My only point is that in such a widely held stock, the premise of undervalued is a bit stretched, as everyone has an opinion and thus, the market has valued the business quite fairly.

Again, I don't want to harp on your methods, simply because I use the same one, but I still believe buying securities when you believe they are properly valued is market timing, albeit a fairly safe way of doing so when choosing dividend - paying stocks with a long history of raising EPS and dividends.

A fairly popular strategy used by both rookie and seasoned investors it to buy a property that is below market value, do some repairs to force appreciation, so the value of the home goes up.

And consistent with that belief is the reality that there will always be overvalued, fairly valued and even undervalued individual stocks available in every market.

Taking into account interest rates, the market seems to be fairly valued currently.

Once the market realizes its mistake, it should drive the price up to the point where to stock is fairly valued.

Vitaliy suggests that investors should profit in range - bound markets by buying value - priced stocks with an adequate margin - of - safety and selling them when they are fairly priced (hence the «Active» in the title).

Market value relative to GDP - fairly valued 6.

You might find that the market is fairly valued.

It will be easy to find high quality companies that yield 4 % to 5 % when the market is fairly valued.

Even if the market was extremely low, I would not invest in any company if I did not consider it fairly valued based on fundamentals at the time.

One conclusion from the above charts is that based on the 128 - year average, the market (as represented by the S&P 500) is fairly valued.

It has been our experience that in every market, whether it is a bull market or a bear market, there will always be individual stocks that are overvalued, undervalued or fairly valued.

Moreover, what I discovered supports my general thesis previously stated above «that in every market, whether it is a bull market or a bear market, there will always be individual stocks that are overvalued, undervalued or fairly valued.»

(Large blend funds invest in stocks with both growth and value attributes, and are fairly representative of the overall stock market.)

I believe a more fairly valued AVGR market cap., and equitable & transparent treatment for all shareholders in the event of a merger (or other transaction), is vital to the long term success & investor support for a potentially enlarged group.

If I had to voice an opinion, I would say the market looks to be fairly to somewhat overvalued (I don't think we're in a bubble, or anything like that... although there are signs of froth in certain areas like social media, tech IPO's, etc... but overall, there are still reasonable values out there).

After the return of volatility in the markets, February turned out to be a fairly significant downer in terms of portfolio value for me.

Second, that regardless of the level of the general market, there will always be overvalued, undervalued and fairly valued individual stocks to be found.

In the current market, there's a solid case that Apple is fairly to slightly under - valued.

Overall, I'd say the Saskatoon real estate market is fairly valued.

«The market is fairly valued, and will respond in the future to the level of earnings growth generated by the recovery,» a professional investor told Barron's in its recent money manager poll, echoing the voice of many stock market pundits.

Individual investors are usually better off, when they ignore concerns about whether the securities markets fairly value investment securities.

While few cash back cards on the market can compete with the 10 % discount offered by the mymaurices VIP Credit Card, the fact that you can only earn that 10 % on Maurices purchases limits its value fairly significantly.