Sentences with phrase «false advertisement as»

False advertisement as far as I am concerned.

Not exact matches

As a result, the traditionally cold, remote and unemotional portrayals of fathers in advertisements now ring false.

«Defendants and their co-conspirators also obtained, and attempted to obtain, false identification documents to use as proof of identity in connection with maintaining accounts and purchasing advertisements on social media sites,» the indictment says.

«Advertisements such as Danone's suggest that follow - on milks provide health benefits, but they are unnecessary products and Danone is simply ripping parents off, using false claims to make them think they need these milks,» said Mike Brady, BMA campaigns and networking coordinator.

Today, a few decades later, many of these ads seem crazy to us, but as a reminder of just how false or incorrect many of today's «health» advertisements are, here are 4 truly insane health ads from around the world.

To quote Doc, something here is ungroovywhich isreally saying something like the Velvelettes, because the «here» of Inherent Vice is a smog - filled, corruption - riddled, slightly zombified cityscape of disillusionment, fleetingfriendships, cynicism, creeping executive - branch fascism, and out - in - the - openvigilante fascism, a place that stands as not just a monument to phoniness buta lurid advertisement for the false.

Now, though, it seems like things are just going to get worse for the two companies as a lawsuit, spotted by Polygon, has been filed against them for misrepresenting the game, or to put it another way for false advertisement.

@imalwaysright: changing the design of the HUD doesn't qualify as false advertisement.

While there is diversity, that is a recent change, and it's still perfectly within my legal rights as an American, to sue for False Advertisement under the Lanham Act, which would entitle me to damages (i could care less) and prevent them from being able to sell items that fall under the description of that case.

The appellate court determined that car purchaser's action resulted in enforcement of an important right to be free of false / misleading advertisement, but sustained the trial court's limitation of the fee award as it did based on the private / public benefit ratio analysis.

Prof. Conduct 123 (2001)(subject to the operational structure and content described in the opinion, a lawyer may affiliate with an online legal services website); Nebraska Op. 07 - 05 (lawyer may participate in internet lawyer directory which identifies itself as a directory, disclaims being a referral service and only lists basic information about lawyers without recommending specific lawyers and charges a reasonable, flat annual advertising fee); New Jersey Committee on Attorney Advertising Op. 36 (2006)(lawyer may pay flat fee to internet marketing company for exclusive website listing for particular county in specific practice area if listing includes prominent, unmistakable disclaimer stating the listings are paid advertisements and not endorsements or authorized referrals); North Carolina Op. 2004 - 1 (lawyer may participate in for - profit online service that is a hybrid referral service - legal directory, provided there is no fee - sharing with the service and communications are truthful); Oregon Op. 2007 - 180 (2007)(lawyer may pay nationwide internet referral service for listing if listing is not false or misleading and does not imply that the lawyer can represent clients outside jurisdictions of the lawyer's license, fee is not based on number of referrals, retained clients or revenue generated by listing and the service does not exercise discretion in matching clients with lawyers); Rhode Island 2005 - 01 (permitting website that enables lawyers to post information about their services and respond to anonymous requests for legal services in exchange for flat annual membership fee if website exercises no discretion over which requests lawyers may access); South Carolina 01 - 03 (lawyer may pay internet advertising service fee determined by the number of «hits» that the service produces for the lawyer provided that the service does not steer business to any particular lawyer and the payments are not based on whether user ultimately becomes a client); Texas Op. 573 (2006)(lawyer may participate in for - profit internet service that matches potential clients and lawyers if selection process is fully automated and performed by computers without the exercise of human discretion); Virginia Advertising Op.

You understand and agree that you shall not to use any functionality provided by the Site to post content or initiate communications that contain: (i) Any unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, profane, hateful, racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable material of any kind, including, but not limited to, any material which encourages conduct that would constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, national or international law; (ii) Advertisements or solicitations of any kind; (iii) Impersonate others or provide any kind of false information; (iv) Personal information such as messages which state phone numbers, account numbers, addresses, or employer references.; (v) Messages by non-spokesperson employees of Policybazaar purporting to speak on behalf of Policybazaar or containing confidential information or expressing opinions concerning Policybazaar; (vi) Messages that offer unauthorized downloads of any copyrighted or private information; (vii) Multiple messages placed within individual folders by the same user restating the same point; (viii) Chain letters of any kind; or (ix) Identical (or substantially similar) messages to multiple recipients advertising any product or service, expressing a political or other similar message, or any other type of unsolicited commercial message.

This myth is perpetuated by dubious advertisements that promise a fast divorce for a small fee: the idea that a divorce can be obtained simply for a small fee, such as $ 399, is not only false, it misrepresents the overall expense involved in an adversarial divorce proceeding and misleads consumers about the amount and quality of legal guidance they will receive in exchange for their hard - earned money.

726 — Any ADVERTISEMENT or incentive or the offering of any incentive or the participation in an incentive program to the public as an inducement to trade in real estate undertaken or authorized by a registrant shall not be: (a) false; (b) inaccurate; (c) reasonably capable of misleading the recipient or intended recipient;

In addition, there is a comprehensive list of rules that NRMLA members are required to follow such as, «NRMLA Members shall not, directly or indirectly, solicit or communicate with consumers through false or misleading or deceptive or unfair communications or advertisements or in any manner inconsistent with applicable law» and «NRMLA Members shall accurately describe both the costs and benefits of the products and services presented to consumers» among many others.