Sentences with phrase «family studies evaluation»

Recent examples include: - the Australian Research Council for research projects that help us to understand current issues and improve our service deliver - the Ian Potter Foundation for an Australian Institute of Family Studies evaluation of our Fun for Kids program - the Legal Services Board Grants Program for a Vietnamese - speaking family violence program in Melbourne's western suburbs - LaTrobe City Council for a community strengthening program for bushfire - impacted Gippslanders.

Then, in May 1994, the court - appointed psychologist submitted a «Family Study Evaluation — Update» with various issues of concern regarding Mother's parenting decisions and Father subsequently filed a second petition for a change of custody.

Not exact matches

A study of military families, in which co-sleeping is common because fathers (and, nowadays, mothers) are often away from home for extended periods, found that children who had coslept as babies received higher evaluations of their comportment in school and exhibited fewer psychiatric problems.

The Trust for the Study of Adolescence is running free, government - funded «evaluation champions» training courses across the UK, for anyone working with children, young people or families, in the voluntary or statutory sectors.

Studies of the Nurse Family Partnership model followed children to 6 years and found significant program effects on language and cognitive functioning as well as fewer behaviour problems in a randomized controlled trial study.24 In addition, more recent evaluations of Healthy Families America have shown small, but favourable effects on young children's development.25, 26

In other words, even when home visitation programs succeed in their goal of changing parent behaviour, these changes do not appear to produce significantly better child outcomes.21, 22 One recent exception, however, was a study of the Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY) model with low - income Latino families showing changes in home parenting and better third - grade math achievement.23 Earlier evaluations of HIPPY found mixed results regarding program effectiveness.

The BCDL study took notes from another research by the Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project funded by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).

Children who regularly sing, play, story - tell and eat dinner with their families tend to have higher social - emotional health (SEH), according to a study by investigators at The Children's Evaluation and Rehabilitation Center (CERC) at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, affiliated with The Children's Hospital at Montefiore (CHAM).

The study was funded by the UCSF Research Evaluation and Allocation Committee — Research Allocation Program and the Alafi Family Foundation.

This year the list is topped by four major research pieces: an analysis of how U.S. students from highly educated families perform compare with similarly advantaged students from other countries; a study investigating what students gain when they are taken on field trips to see high - quality theater performances; a study of teacher evaluation systems in four urban school districts that identifies strengths and weaknesses of different evaluation systems; and the results of Education Next's annual survey of public opinion on education.

Dr. Crowley is an Assistant Professor of Human Development and Family Studies and an expert in economic evaluation and is engaged in multiple efforts to understand the value of investing in social and emotional development.

Ten years of evaluation and research of over 100 studies shows that family involvement in the home improves math skills.

I compare the impacts of increased family support on student test scores from these four studies with the impacts of pre-K school readiness interventions using, first, a synthesis of findings from 67 pre-K evaluations of test outcomes 2 - 4 years after pre-K, [xv] and, second, the follow - up findings from the Head Start Impact Study [xvi] for 3rd graders.

The Family Engagement Partnership Student Outcome Evaluation, a study conducted by the Johns Hopkins University School of Education, links improvements in the performance of D.C. public elementary school students with Flamboyan's Family Engagement Partnership (FEP).

More recently, Esteban extended his research with two new grants: one supporting a longitudinal study of symptoms of depression among Caucasian, African - American and Latino children; and the other supporting an evaluation of a randomized control trial of the Family Coping Skills Program in a population of low - income Latina mothers.

The most comprehensive and rigorous evaluation to date is the Head Start Impact Study (HSIS), sponsored by the Administration for Children and Families in the Department of Health and Human Services.

Our study explores this question by examining ethnic and linguistic variation in the alignment between parents» and teachers» evaluations of their relationship, as well as the extent to which participation in a family engagement program designed to strengthen relationships among parents, school staff, and children might improve parents» and teachers» perceptions of one another or bring these perceptions into closer alignment.

Our services include collaborative practice, psychotherapy, psychological evaluations, parenting coordination, forensic evaluations, family mediation, adoption home study evaluations, and substance abuse evaluations.

The Mount Sinai Traumatic Stress Studies Program is comprehensive evaluation and treatment for trauma survivors and their families by experienced professionals.

In this study, the higher the score of the individual family care degree of the higher life satisfaction of evaluation, this means that individual's family environment better, the individual to the family as it certainly sure or family to individual, then life satisfaction evaluation will be more and more certain.

Evidence - Based Practices for Children Exposed to Violence: A Selection From Federal Databases (PDF - 335 KB) U.S. Department of Justice & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2011) Summarizes Federal reviews of research studies and program evaluations to help localities address childhood exposure to violence and improve outcomes for children, families, and communities.

Systems of Care Implementation Case Studies (PDF - 1,198 KB) National Technical Assistance and Evaluation Center for Systems of Care, 2010 Features detailed examination of the strategies and approaches used by two grant sites — Contra Costa County, California, and North Carolina — to implement Systems of Care principles, including family involvement.

Existing studies have shown that the influencing factors of life satisfaction included family factors and the individual in their life satisfaction evaluation was from the environment.

Handbook of Family Resilience Becvar (2013) View Abstract Explores how resilient families adapt and adjust and includes discussions related to the evaluation of a family resilience focus, a consideration of methodological issues when attempting to study family resilience, and ramifications of and approaches related to the inclusion of family resilience in clinical praFamily Resilience Becvar (2013) View Abstract Explores how resilient families adapt and adjust and includes discussions related to the evaluation of a family resilience focus, a consideration of methodological issues when attempting to study family resilience, and ramifications of and approaches related to the inclusion of family resilience in clinical prafamily resilience focus, a consideration of methodological issues when attempting to study family resilience, and ramifications of and approaches related to the inclusion of family resilience in clinical prafamily resilience, and ramifications of and approaches related to the inclusion of family resilience in clinical prafamily resilience in clinical practice.

Evaluation of a brief pilot psychoeducational support group intervention for family caregivers of cancer patients: a quasi-experimental mixed - methods study.

The evidence base for FLNP includes qualitative research showing that parents recruited through schools value the programme and perceive it to have an impact on family relationships, children's behaviour and their own mental health51; «before and after» studies in community groups showing impact on self - report measures of relationship quality and well - being52; and routine evaluation by parents attending programmes showing that the great majority value the programme.53

A self administered questionnaire was used to screen participants and gather data on demographic variables, depression (the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale [CES - D]-RRB-, suicide (3 items added to the CES - D), life changes (a modified version of the Coddington Life Event Schedule for Adolescents), and family environment (Family Adaptation and Cohesion Evaluation Scfamily environment (Family Adaptation and Cohesion Evaluation ScFamily Adaptation and Cohesion Evaluation Scales).

Behavior therapy is considered probably efficacious for childhood depression, and a number of other experimental interventions show promise but require further evaluation.12 Currently, only 2 research groups have focused on psychosocial interventions for childhood bipolar disorder.13 - 15 Hence, increased attention to creation and testing of treatments specifically targeting depression and bipolar disorder in children is needed.16 In particular, studies should focus on children's developmental needs, address comorbidity, involve family members in treatment, demonstrate treatment gains as rated by parents and clinicians rather than children themselves, and compare experimental interventions with standard care or treatment as usual (TAU) rather than no - treatment or attention control groups.12, 17,18 In addition, parental psychopathology may affect treatment adherence and response.

One evaluation conducted in Queensland, Australia, reported moderate reductions in depressive symptoms for mothers in the intervention group at the six - week follow - up.89 A subsequent follow - up, however, suggested that these benefits were not long lasting, as the depression effects had diminished by one year.90 Similarly, Healthy Families San Diego identified reductions in depression symptoms among program mothers during the first two years, but these effects, too, had diminished by year three.91 In Healthy Families New York, mothers at one site (that was supervised by a clinical psychologist) had lower rates of depression at one year (23 percent treatment vs. 38 percent controls).92 The Infant Health and Development program also demonstrated decreases in depressive symptoms after one year of home visiting, as well as at the conclusion of the program at three years.93 Among Early Head Start families, maternal depressive symptoms remained stable for the program group during the study and immediately after it ended, but decreased just before their children entered kindergarten.94 No program effects were found for maternal depression in the Nurse - Family Partnership, Hawaii Healthy Start, Healthy Families Alaska, or Early Start pFamilies San Diego identified reductions in depression symptoms among program mothers during the first two years, but these effects, too, had diminished by year three.91 In Healthy Families New York, mothers at one site (that was supervised by a clinical psychologist) had lower rates of depression at one year (23 percent treatment vs. 38 percent controls).92 The Infant Health and Development program also demonstrated decreases in depressive symptoms after one year of home visiting, as well as at the conclusion of the program at three years.93 Among Early Head Start families, maternal depressive symptoms remained stable for the program group during the study and immediately after it ended, but decreased just before their children entered kindergarten.94 No program effects were found for maternal depression in the Nurse - Family Partnership, Hawaii Healthy Start, Healthy Families Alaska, or Early Start pFamilies New York, mothers at one site (that was supervised by a clinical psychologist) had lower rates of depression at one year (23 percent treatment vs. 38 percent controls).92 The Infant Health and Development program also demonstrated decreases in depressive symptoms after one year of home visiting, as well as at the conclusion of the program at three years.93 Among Early Head Start families, maternal depressive symptoms remained stable for the program group during the study and immediately after it ended, but decreased just before their children entered kindergarten.94 No program effects were found for maternal depression in the Nurse - Family Partnership, Hawaii Healthy Start, Healthy Families Alaska, or Early Start pfamilies, maternal depressive symptoms remained stable for the program group during the study and immediately after it ended, but decreased just before their children entered kindergarten.94 No program effects were found for maternal depression in the Nurse - Family Partnership, Hawaii Healthy Start, Healthy Families Alaska, or Early Start pFamilies Alaska, or Early Start programs.

Case study: Family art evaluation in a Brazilian guidance clinic: American Journal of Art Therapy Vol 14 (4) Jul 1975, 132 - 139.

The social support and family health study: a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of two alternative forms of postnatal support for mothers living in disadvantaged inner city areas

Further, few studies have reported economic evaluations for early intervention programs for children's mental health.7, 25,32 Such evaluations could include implementation service costs (training, program materials, provider salaries), costs to families (time off work, transport costs), and later health / welfare costs saved from implementing an early intervention.

The study supplements CFRP's implementation evaluation and the family retention evaluation of the state - wide Texas Home Visiting program.

An adoption home study is an evaluation written by a licensed adoption agency detailing your family's suitability to become adoptive parent (s).

Family Voices: Piloting a New Qualitative Measure of Family Engagement for Head Start and Early Head Start Staff and Families (PDF - 2,468 KB) Aikens, Bandel, Akers, Lyskawa, & Jerald (2014) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation & Mathematica Policy Research Focuses on the development of qualitative instruments designed to better understand family engagement in Head Start and Early Head Start; draws on pilot data collected during the 2012 - 2013 program year; and provides information about the performance of the piloted interview protocols, revisions made to instruments based on their performance, and the best methods for gathering qualitative information about family engagement experiences from families and staff in future stFamily Voices: Piloting a New Qualitative Measure of Family Engagement for Head Start and Early Head Start Staff and Families (PDF - 2,468 KB) Aikens, Bandel, Akers, Lyskawa, & Jerald (2014) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation & Mathematica Policy Research Focuses on the development of qualitative instruments designed to better understand family engagement in Head Start and Early Head Start; draws on pilot data collected during the 2012 - 2013 program year; and provides information about the performance of the piloted interview protocols, revisions made to instruments based on their performance, and the best methods for gathering qualitative information about family engagement experiences from families and staff in future stFamily Engagement for Head Start and Early Head Start Staff and Families (PDF - 2,468 KB) Aikens, Bandel, Akers, Lyskawa, & Jerald (2014) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation & Mathematica Policy Research Focuses on the development of qualitative instruments designed to better understand family engagement in Head Start and Early Head Start; draws on pilot data collected during the 2012 - 2013 program year; and provides information about the performance of the piloted interview protocols, revisions made to instruments based on their performance, and the best methods for gathering qualitative information about family engagement experiences from families and staff in future Families (PDF - 2,468 KB) Aikens, Bandel, Akers, Lyskawa, & Jerald (2014) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation & Mathematica Policy Research Focuses on the development of qualitative instruments designed to better understand family engagement in Head Start and Early Head Start; draws on pilot data collected during the 2012 - 2013 program year; and provides information about the performance of the piloted interview protocols, revisions made to instruments based on their performance, and the best methods for gathering qualitative information about family engagement experiences from families and staff in future Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation & Mathematica Policy Research Focuses on the development of qualitative instruments designed to better understand family engagement in Head Start and Early Head Start; draws on pilot data collected during the 2012 - 2013 program year; and provides information about the performance of the piloted interview protocols, revisions made to instruments based on their performance, and the best methods for gathering qualitative information about family engagement experiences from families and staff in future stfamily engagement in Head Start and Early Head Start; draws on pilot data collected during the 2012 - 2013 program year; and provides information about the performance of the piloted interview protocols, revisions made to instruments based on their performance, and the best methods for gathering qualitative information about family engagement experiences from families and staff in future stfamily engagement experiences from families and staff in future families and staff in future studies.

NRFC relies on multiple avenues to share information including: the fatherhood.gov website, media campaigns, social media, virtual trainings, outreach and presentations at events, written products to advance the fields of responsible fatherhood research and practice, and a National Call Center for fathers and responsible fatherhood practitioners.10 In addition, the ACF's Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation (OPRE) is implementing several research and evaluation projects, including the Building Bridges and Bonds (B3), the Parents and Children Together (PaCT) Responsible Fatherhood Evaluation, the Fatherhood and Marriage Local Evaluation and Cross-Site (FaMLE Cross-Site) project, and the Ex-Prisoner Reentry Strategies Study, all of which partner with Responsible Fatherhood programs.11 OPRE also awards grants to fund research on Healthy Marriage / Responsible Fatherhood, and provides information on the curricula used by Healthy Marriage / Responsible Fatherhood grantees through its Strengthening Families Curriculum Guide.12 To promote rigorous evaluation, strengthen the field of fatherhood research, and share information on effective fatherhood research and evaluation practices, OPRE funded the Fatherhood Research and Practice Network (FRPN).13 FRPN provides grants to study responsible fatherhood programs, develops and shares measurement instruments for use in fatherhood program evaluations, and provides training and technical assistance to practitioners and researchers through webinars, written documents, and its Researcher and PractitioneEvaluation (OPRE) is implementing several research and evaluation projects, including the Building Bridges and Bonds (B3), the Parents and Children Together (PaCT) Responsible Fatherhood Evaluation, the Fatherhood and Marriage Local Evaluation and Cross-Site (FaMLE Cross-Site) project, and the Ex-Prisoner Reentry Strategies Study, all of which partner with Responsible Fatherhood programs.11 OPRE also awards grants to fund research on Healthy Marriage / Responsible Fatherhood, and provides information on the curricula used by Healthy Marriage / Responsible Fatherhood grantees through its Strengthening Families Curriculum Guide.12 To promote rigorous evaluation, strengthen the field of fatherhood research, and share information on effective fatherhood research and evaluation practices, OPRE funded the Fatherhood Research and Practice Network (FRPN).13 FRPN provides grants to study responsible fatherhood programs, develops and shares measurement instruments for use in fatherhood program evaluations, and provides training and technical assistance to practitioners and researchers through webinars, written documents, and its Researcher and Practitioneevaluation projects, including the Building Bridges and Bonds (B3), the Parents and Children Together (PaCT) Responsible Fatherhood Evaluation, the Fatherhood and Marriage Local Evaluation and Cross-Site (FaMLE Cross-Site) project, and the Ex-Prisoner Reentry Strategies Study, all of which partner with Responsible Fatherhood programs.11 OPRE also awards grants to fund research on Healthy Marriage / Responsible Fatherhood, and provides information on the curricula used by Healthy Marriage / Responsible Fatherhood grantees through its Strengthening Families Curriculum Guide.12 To promote rigorous evaluation, strengthen the field of fatherhood research, and share information on effective fatherhood research and evaluation practices, OPRE funded the Fatherhood Research and Practice Network (FRPN).13 FRPN provides grants to study responsible fatherhood programs, develops and shares measurement instruments for use in fatherhood program evaluations, and provides training and technical assistance to practitioners and researchers through webinars, written documents, and its Researcher and PractitioneEvaluation, the Fatherhood and Marriage Local Evaluation and Cross-Site (FaMLE Cross-Site) project, and the Ex-Prisoner Reentry Strategies Study, all of which partner with Responsible Fatherhood programs.11 OPRE also awards grants to fund research on Healthy Marriage / Responsible Fatherhood, and provides information on the curricula used by Healthy Marriage / Responsible Fatherhood grantees through its Strengthening Families Curriculum Guide.12 To promote rigorous evaluation, strengthen the field of fatherhood research, and share information on effective fatherhood research and evaluation practices, OPRE funded the Fatherhood Research and Practice Network (FRPN).13 FRPN provides grants to study responsible fatherhood programs, develops and shares measurement instruments for use in fatherhood program evaluations, and provides training and technical assistance to practitioners and researchers through webinars, written documents, and its Researcher and PractitioneEvaluation and Cross-Site (FaMLE Cross-Site) project, and the Ex-Prisoner Reentry Strategies Study, all of which partner with Responsible Fatherhood programs.11 OPRE also awards grants to fund research on Healthy Marriage / Responsible Fatherhood, and provides information on the curricula used by Healthy Marriage / Responsible Fatherhood grantees through its Strengthening Families Curriculum Guide.12 To promote rigorous evaluation, strengthen the field of fatherhood research, and share information on effective fatherhood research and evaluation practices, OPRE funded the Fatherhood Research and Practice Network (FRPN).13 FRPN provides grants to study responsible fatherhood programs, develops and shares measurement instruments for use in fatherhood program evaluations, and provides training and technical assistance to practitioners and researchers through webinars, written documents, and its Researcher and Practitioner ForStudy, all of which partner with Responsible Fatherhood programs.11 OPRE also awards grants to fund research on Healthy Marriage / Responsible Fatherhood, and provides information on the curricula used by Healthy Marriage / Responsible Fatherhood grantees through its Strengthening Families Curriculum Guide.12 To promote rigorous evaluation, strengthen the field of fatherhood research, and share information on effective fatherhood research and evaluation practices, OPRE funded the Fatherhood Research and Practice Network (FRPN).13 FRPN provides grants to study responsible fatherhood programs, develops and shares measurement instruments for use in fatherhood program evaluations, and provides training and technical assistance to practitioners and researchers through webinars, written documents, and its Researcher and Practitioneevaluation, strengthen the field of fatherhood research, and share information on effective fatherhood research and evaluation practices, OPRE funded the Fatherhood Research and Practice Network (FRPN).13 FRPN provides grants to study responsible fatherhood programs, develops and shares measurement instruments for use in fatherhood program evaluations, and provides training and technical assistance to practitioners and researchers through webinars, written documents, and its Researcher and Practitioneevaluation practices, OPRE funded the Fatherhood Research and Practice Network (FRPN).13 FRPN provides grants to study responsible fatherhood programs, develops and shares measurement instruments for use in fatherhood program evaluations, and provides training and technical assistance to practitioners and researchers through webinars, written documents, and its Researcher and Practitioner Forstudy responsible fatherhood programs, develops and shares measurement instruments for use in fatherhood program evaluations, and provides training and technical assistance to practitioners and researchers through webinars, written documents, and its Researcher and Practitioner Forum.14

Integrated Mental Health Treatment and HIV Prevention for Court - Involved Youth The purpose of this study is to compare the relative efficacy of an integrated mental health treatment and HIV prevention program to standard - of - care mental health treatment for 200 youth receiving mental health evaluations through the RI Family Court, Juvenile Mental Health Clinic.

Structured Analysis Family Evaluation (SAFE) Consortium for Children (2011) Provides information on the SAFE home study assessment process, which allows child welfare agencies to evaluate prospective families for foster and adoptive placement using a uniformed guide.

SAFE Home Study: The Model Home Study for Adoption and Foster Care Consortium for Children (2006) Provides home study practitioners with a structured method to process, analyze, and assess the information they collect during a home study culminating in a comprehensive evaluation of family functioStudy: The Model Home Study for Adoption and Foster Care Consortium for Children (2006) Provides home study practitioners with a structured method to process, analyze, and assess the information they collect during a home study culminating in a comprehensive evaluation of family functioStudy for Adoption and Foster Care Consortium for Children (2006) Provides home study practitioners with a structured method to process, analyze, and assess the information they collect during a home study culminating in a comprehensive evaluation of family functiostudy practitioners with a structured method to process, analyze, and assess the information they collect during a home study culminating in a comprehensive evaluation of family functiostudy culminating in a comprehensive evaluation of family functioning.

The study — An Evaluation of the Cost of Family Law Disputes: Measuring the Cost Implication of Various Dispute Resolution Methods — is based on a survey of 166 family lawyers in Ontario, Alberta, Nova Scotia and British ColFamily Law Disputes: Measuring the Cost Implication of Various Dispute Resolution Methods — is based on a survey of 166 family lawyers in Ontario, Alberta, Nova Scotia and British Colfamily lawyers in Ontario, Alberta, Nova Scotia and British Columbia.

The American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy recommends three tests: Facilitating Open Couple Communication, Understanding and Study (FOCCUS); Relationship Evaluation (RELATE); and Premarital Preparation and Relationship Enhancement (PREPARE).

Structured Home Study Evaluations: Perceived Benefits of SAFE Versus Conventional Home Studies Crea, Barth, Chintapalli, & Buchanan Adoption Quarterly, 12 (2), 2009 View Abstract Measures child welfare professionals» perception of the Structured Analysis Family Evaluation home study process that encourages consistent evaluations across workers, agencies, and jurisdictStudy Evaluations: Perceived Benefits of SAFE Versus Conventional Home Studies Crea, Barth, Chintapalli, & Buchanan Adoption Quarterly, 12 (2), 2009 View Abstract Measures child welfare professionals» perception of the Structured Analysis Family Evaluation home study process that encourages consistent evaluations across workers, agencies, and jurEvaluations: Perceived Benefits of SAFE Versus Conventional Home Studies Crea, Barth, Chintapalli, & Buchanan Adoption Quarterly, 12 (2), 2009 View Abstract Measures child welfare professionals» perception of the Structured Analysis Family Evaluation home study process that encourages consistent evaluations across workers, agencies, and jurisdictstudy process that encourages consistent evaluations across workers, agencies, and jurevaluations across workers, agencies, and jurisdictions.

The largest independent evaluation of a marriage education curriculum developed by Gottman, known as «Loving Couples, Loving Children,» [15] was conducted by Mathematica Policy Research [16] at nine sites in five states through the federally funded, multi-year Building Strong Families Program study contracted by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.

The evaluation will study the 4 home visiting models selected by at least 10 states, including the following: Early Head Start — Home Visiting, Healthy Families America, Nurse Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.

Parent Training Program Holds Promise for a Child Welfare Population (PDF - 1,1475 KB) Marcynyszyn, Maher, & Corwin (2012) University of Minnesota, Center for Advanced Studies in Child Welfare CW360 °: A Comprehensive Look at a Prevalent Child Welfare Issue Shares results from a mixed - methods evaluation involving staff and 24 caregivers at two agencies in New York that used the Incredible Years (IY) and indicates that following the intervention, caregivers reported lower levels of stress, increased empathy toward their children, and more family and overall support.

HFA Evaluation Results Healthy Families America Summaries of evaluation studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of Healthy FamiliesEvaluation Results Healthy Families America Summaries of evaluation studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of Healthy Familiesevaluation studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of Healthy Families programs.

This article describes HSP, its ongoing evaluation study, and evaluation findings at the end of two of a planned three years of family program participation and follow - up.

The evaluation is looking at a variety of child and family factors, such as the race and ethnicity of resource families, length of stay, the time from a family's inquiry to being approved, and the time required to receive a home study.

Family Development Matrix: Pathways to the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect Institute for Community Collaborative Studies & Strategies (2011) Provides an integrated family assessment tool for case management and outcomes evaluation in county - based service networks and Tribal programs in CalifFamily Development Matrix: Pathways to the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect Institute for Community Collaborative Studies & Strategies (2011) Provides an integrated family assessment tool for case management and outcomes evaluation in county - based service networks and Tribal programs in Califfamily assessment tool for case management and outcomes evaluation in county - based service networks and Tribal programs in California.

Fact: Studies indicate that parents who are subjected to the forced and artificial arrangement of their families by third party evaluators have two to two and a half times the rate of relitigation of parents who do not undergo the custody evaluation process.