Sentences with phrase «federal circuit affirmed»

Following Covington's argument in April 2015, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's decision, securing the clients» victory.

The Federal Circuit affirmed the judgment in Union Carbide's favor and reversed a pre-trial ruling adverse to Union Carbide that had limited the scope of damages presented to the jury.

Successfully defended leading seller of home fitness equipment against patent infringement and state law claims relating its distribution of popular fitness equipment in which district court granted summary judgment and Federal Circuit affirmed.

Successfully defended leading heavy equipment producer in a patent infringement case relating to hydraulic control systems in which district court awarded our client attorneys» fees and Federal Circuit affirmed.

After the Federal Circuit affirmed (right before the 2014 trial) Judge Posner's claim construction, it was crystal clear to me that Apple no longer had a case over that patent.

Earlier this month the Federal Circuit affirmed a permanent patent injunction in Versata v. SAP.

On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court.

The Federal Circuit affirmed late last week in ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Octane Fitness, LLC, Nos. 2016 - 1047 & -1101 (Fed.

The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment, holding, in a 6 - 5 decision, that laches could still apply in a patent case, and that Petrella did not apply, because the patent damages statute was different from the copyright statue.

Thus, the Federal Circuit affirmed.

On June 6, 2017, the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas dismissing a declaratory judgment action filed against Brooks Kushman's client Ford Global Technologies LLC by New World International, Inc..

«The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court's judgment that Merck could not collect the award because of its «unclean hands» in procuring the two patents asserted against Gilead Sciences Inc.,» writes Tony Dutra.

The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's decision in Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc., 126 F. 3d 1420 (Fed.

(U.S. Patent Nos. 6,785,825 and 6,044,471) The Federal Circuit affirmed the jury verdict.

[3] In a divided decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB by ruling that the decision to institute was not subject to appeal and that the PTAB reasonably acted within its rulemaking authority in construing claims under the BRI standard.

The Federal Circuit affirmed Judge Posner's claim construction.

The trial court disagreed, and the Federal Circuit affirmed.

In a 2 - 1 decision written by Circuit Judge Timothy B. Dyk, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB proceedings in all respects.

On the merits of the PTAB's decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's decision that three claims in the «376 patent were invalid.

The Federal Circuit affirmed the judgment.

The Federal Circuit affirmed without opinion the Board's finding that the claims in United Therapeutics» patent were both anticipated and obvious on multiple grounds.

Not exact matches

The federal district court affirmed the Department of Education's decision, as did the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, applying the Supreme Court's reasoning in the Rowley decision.

After the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed their right to do so, in AEP v. Connecticut, the Supreme Court reversed on the grounds that such claims were «displaced by the federal legislation authorizing EPA to regulate carbon - dioxide emissions.»

«That panel decision was subsequently affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which set aside an $ 86.5 million infringement verdict won by the company,» says the NLJ.

2016), the Federal Circuit recently affirmed a district court's decision declining to grant attorney's fees because «there was nothing obviously unreasonable» about the losing litigant's position, which the district court found to be «non-frivolous.»

But for now, the key thing is that the Federal Circuit has affirmed Judge Posner's construction of the» 647 «quick links» (I usually called it «data tapping») patent:

The Commission then appealed to the federal Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which affirmed the district court's judgment on July 13, 2009.

The Supreme Court affirmed the finding of the Federal Circuit that the disparagement clause [is] facially unconstitutional under the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause.

But rangeCheck, which Judge Alsup also deemed copyrightable (a fact some people seem to have forgotten; affirmed by the Federal Circuit, by the way), is not at the heart of this case.

The decision was affirmed on appeal to the Federal Circuit.

A federal district court in Hawaii issued an injunction and, in December 2017, the 9th Circuit affirmed.

The Virginia Supreme Court then affirmed the rulings of the federal district court, and the US Fourth Circuit subsequently affirmed the judgment in its entirety.

The Court affirmed the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, holding that the USPTO acted within its authority in promulgating rules requiring the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to...

Samsung argues that it was Apple's choice to base its» 647 - related arguments on a broader claim construction than the one the Federal Circuit ultimately affirmed (Samsung says «Apple «shot for the moon»»), and «Apple's risk failed» when the appeals court handed down its opinion in what I always just call the «Posner case».

Steve Goldman obtained summary judgment for our client in the federal district court for the Northern District of Florida and successfully argued the appeal before the Eleventh Circuit, which affirmed the judgment in favor of our client.

Ancora v. Apple — Appeal to Federal Circuit & Petition for Certiorari Handled & argued appeal on behalf of Ancora reversing district court's claim construction of term «program,» and affirming district's court's finding of no indefiniteness.

We obtained judgment of non-infringement (affirmed by the Federal Circuit) in a patent infringement bench trial litigation in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

The decision affirmed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and endorsed the USPTO's positions on both issues.

We obtained stipulated judgment of non-infringement following a favorable claim construction ruling, which was affirmed by the Federal Circuit on appeal.

In a unanimous decision written by Justice Breyer, the Supreme Court affirmed the Federal Circuit on both issues.

Participated in an appeal on behalf of a Fortune 500 company to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which affirmed a summary judgment in a multi-million dollar federal court employment discrimination lawsuit

The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit's decision, resolving a conflict among Circuit Courts regarding the interplay between contractual limitations provisions required by most states» insurance laws and federal case law regarding accrual of ERISA claims.

If the Federal Circuit's interpretation of the statute was affirmed, design patent damages would be a total outlier in the context of remedies for intellectual property infringement.

FlashPoint appealed the Commission's determination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which affirmed the Commission's decision in favor of HTC less than a week after oral arguments.

A judgment for Honeywell was entered by the trial court and, after Federal Circuit and Supreme Court review, was affirmed after eleven years of litigation.

Oil States appealed to the Federal Circuit, which affirmed in an unpublished decision.

In an unusual en banc decision rendered without requesting briefing from the parties, the United States, or interested amici curiae, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently affirmed several rulings in favor of Apple Inc. in its ongoing smartphone patent war with Samsung.

The Court affirmed the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, holding that the USPTO acted within its authority in promulgating rules requiring the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to construe patent claims in inter partes review proceedings under the «broadest reasonable interpretation» (or «BRI») standard.

«A Revived Injunction: Federal Circuit Recently Affirmed Vitality of this Patent Remedy» National Law JournalJanuary 2, 2012 — Brooks Kushman patent attorney in Michigan, Tom Lewry was quoted in the National Law Journal article, «A Revived Injunction: Federal Circuit Recently Affirmed Vitality of this Patent Remedy.»

Defense of two parallel actions in New York federal court challenging the independence of directors and the magnitude of advisory and 12b - 1 fees under Section 36 (b) of the Investment Company Act; the court dismissed both complaints with prejudice and Second Circuit affirmed.