Sentences with phrase «federal claims does»

Oct 23, 2017) highlights the importance of educating the court on what you think is the most streamlined, cost - effective approach to discovery.OverviewWhile the Court of Federal Claims doesn't often deal with large document e-discovery issues, but in this case, shareholders sued the government on a Fifth Amendment claim for regulatory taking based on the denial of stock dividends.

Not exact matches

The federal government in Canada doesn't plan to legalize edibles until at least 2019, providing many more months for companies to solve this vexing issue — and more time for alcohol companies to stake a claim.

However, most donors don't take a deduction for their charitable contributions: Federal data show that in 2016, taxpayers claimed $ 57.55 billion for their donations, with most of the deductions going to higher earners.

Stuart and Susan Silverman are suing Joshua Blackman, Vice Energy LLC, Philip Dade, and Vice Productions in Long Island Federal Court claiming they did $ 20,000 in damage to their summer home, according to Courthouse News.

«State attorneys general told five of the nation's largest banks on Tuesday they face a potential liability of at least $ 17 billion in civil lawsuits if a settlement isn't reached to address improper foreclosure practices» a «figure [that] doesn't cover additional billions of dollars in potential claims from federal agencies,» the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday.

We've already made modest progress: in February, Canada and China signed a Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement, which the federal government claims will make doing business in China safer and more predictable for Canadians.

About one - third of tax filers opt to itemize deductions on their federal income tax returns (figure 1), and virtually all who do itemize claim a deduction for state and local taxes paid.

It has come to my attention that some economists claim that our sovereign federal government is more or less powerless to kickstart the economy because of our great dependence on the United States and therefore should do next to nothing: «Mr. Orr and other economists urged Ottawa to ignore pleas to boost stimulus spending further -LSB-...]

«The IRS offers no explanation as to how the IRS can legitimately use most of these millions of records on hundreds of thousands of users; instead, it claims that as long as it has submitted a declaration from an IRS agent that the IRS «is conducting an investigation to determine the identity and correct federal income tax liabilities of United States persons who conducted transactions in a virtual currency during 2013 - 2015» the Court must find that the Summons does not involve an abuse of process.

Even if regulators do not act, when a presale results in nothing more than profits for its promoter, a disgruntled investor will inevitably make a private securities fraud claim to try and claw back some of their capital; assuming a court will determine a presale of digital tokens to be a private placement of securities, any such federal claim would fall under Rule 10b - 5.

At issue is whether Lehman's crisis was merely a temporary «liquidity problem,» that time would have cleaned up much like BP's oil spill in the Gulf; or, did the firm suffer a more deep - seated «balance sheet problem» (negative equity), as Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke claims — a junk balance sheet, composed of assets that not only had no buyers at the time, but had no visible likelihood of recovering their market price even after the $ 13 trillion the Treasury and Federal Reserve have spent to bail out Wall Street.

Half of the loan balances Navient collects payments on for the federal government are enrolled in income - driven repayment plans, and the company says claims «that we do not educate borrowers about IDR plans ignore the facts.»

I am going to weigh in, being a catholic and the whole shabang... First of all this is not infringing on anyone's right to practice their religion... Requiring insurance companies to provide contraception for women does not mean the woman has to use it or purchase it... Catholic hospitals take federal funds for their patients, therefore they are not exempt from employment laws... If the Catholic Diocese doesn't want to provide the insurance claiming religious beliefs, then they can no longer accept federal funded patients... They also know that they will be subjected to discrimination lawsuits based hiring and religious discrimination — non-catholics work there, and therefore are being denied healthcare due to catholic beliefs... Majority if not all Catholic women do, have, or had used contraception in their lifetime... God does not nor does the bible say anything about contraception, since it had not been invented yet — so this is a man - made law, made by a bunch of men, who have never had a menstrual cycle — and the pain that comes with it....

The court found that the plaintiff had a private right of action under Illinois state law and the identical federal law did not apply to preempt the state law claim.

But that doesn't seem to stop most of them, until, at least, their claims attract the attention of the Federal Trade Commission.

WITS is part of the First Lady's «Chefs Move to Schools» planning team, so it was all the more surprising when the NYC DOE revoked authorization for the program, claiming the WITS fresh, scratch - cooked meals don't meet the new federal school meal regulations.

Windsor sought to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses, but was barred from doing so by § 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which amended the Dictionary Act — a law providing rules of construction for over 1,000 federal laws and the whole realm of federal regulations to define «marriage» and «spouse» as excluding same - sex partners.

Nwokocha - Ahaaiwe, a legal practitioner had alleged that Buhari was not qualified to aspire for the office of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria because he did not sit for the Cambridge West African School Certificate, WASC, in 1961 as he claimed.

Though the federal government did consent to some tort suits in the Federal Tort Claims Act, the Act expressly excluded the kind of claim you are trying to brinfederal government did consent to some tort suits in the Federal Tort Claims Act, the Act expressly excluded the kind of claim you are trying to brinFederal Tort Claims Act, the Act expressly excluded the kind of claim you are trying to bring here.

At the time, Morabito said the decision would allow him to pursue his claim in federal court, which he is now doing.

Romney raised fees, but he can claim that he didn't increase taxes because the federal government funded almost half of his reforms.

De Blasio claimed the firing of a top city official had «nothing to do» with the aide telling federal investigators City Hall improperly intervened on behalf of a big campaign donor.

«That differential arises first because some of the claims do not belong to the Federal Government.

Some federal prosecutors and judges don't know what it's like to serve in combat — and that may doom Michael Grimm, his political mentor claimed today.

«Though the government is claiming that it going to get assistance from the Federal government on the programme, it does not make sense that a state that gets a mere N3.5 billion from the Federation account each month and, has a wage bill about N2.2 billion per month could use N1.8 billion to feed kids that should be fed by their parents.»

Schneiderman in a statement on Monday afternoon blasted the claim by the U.S. attorney general, Jeff Sessions, that states and local governments do not have the authority to refused participation in immigration enforcement actions with the federal government.

When Manhattan's federal appeals court vacated Silver's corruption conviction last week, it left open the door to a new trial by unanimously rejecting Silver's claim that the feds didn't present enough evidence to prove he took «pay - to - play» kickbacks.

Federal prosecutors said Silver received bribes through work he claimed to do for personal injury law firm Weitz & Luxenberg and a real estate law firm.

Silver now faces charges for fraud, after federal prosecutors say he received bribes through work he claimed to do for a personal injury law firm and a real estate law firm.

The papers, which respond to arguments raised by the attorney of the former aide, Joe Percoco, push back against claims federal prosecutors did not provide defense lawyers enough time to respond before the trial begins early next year.

Republicans attempted to defund its implementation, [375][392] and in October 2013, House Republicans refused to fund the federal government unless accompanied with a delay in ACA implementation, after the President unilaterally deferred the employer mandate by one year, which critics claimed he had no power to do.

Elizabeth Crothers, who accused Silver's legislative counsel in 2001 of raping her, and Chloe Rivera, who claimed Silver didn't take sexual harassment claims seriously enough, spoke to the News Tuesday about Silver's conviction on seven federal corruption charges.

The federal indictment found Scarborough claimed per diems 174 times between 2009 and 2012 for days he either wasn't in Albany or didn't spend enough time outside the district to be eligible for the payment.

So why do products like Cold - EEZE and Airborne keep on selling, even after class - action suits and Federal Trade Commission actions alleging that their claims of treating the common cold were unsubstantiated?

In the U.S., where flood insurance does not appeal to most commercial insurers, it is primarily provided by the federal government's National Flood Insurance Program, which has borrowed over $ 25 billion from the national Treasury to help pay its claims.

A judge in Wyoming just made an important ruling about fracking in claiming that the federal government didn't have the right to regulate fracking.

Lynda Kelly and Miranda Soegi of California have initiated a federal class action lawsuit which claims that eHarmony does not have a scientifically proven system for matching members.

However, this effort failed in 1973 as a result of the Supreme Court's ruling in San Antonio v. Rodriquez that such claims did not have a basis under federal equal protection laws.

Parents of female basketball players at Franklin High School have sued, claiming that because it does not schedule as many girls» games during «prime time» slots as it does boys» games, the school district is in violation of Title IX, which forbids discrimination based on sex in programs receiving federal funds.

This report, «An Evidence - Based Approach to School Finance Adequacy in Washington,» claims to present scientific evidence of exactly what needs to be done to bring every child to proficiency as defined under state and federal law.

The District Court granted summary judgment to the school district, finding that state law did not bar the district's use of the racial tiebreaker and that the plan survived strict scrutiny on the federal constitutional claim because it was narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest.

They do so today for countless purposes, typically to claim a right to free and edgy speech on T - shirts or banners under the First Amendment, to assert rights to education of the handicapped under the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and to ask for more school spending under state constitutional provisions that are said to guarantee an equitable or an adequate education.

The best they can do is to make the unsubstantiated claim that it is «not unusual for some private placements to cost $ 100,000 or more» and to blame the federal government for not providing as large a subsidy as they would like.

In addition, the main thrust of the report's criticism, that the state's ESSA plan is not sufficiently similar to what it would have been had No Child Left Behind remained in effect, assumes the test - based accountability strategy that these reviewers have made their careers pursuing had been effective, which it has not; and therefore, when coupled with the false claim that California has high - quality academic standards and assessments, which it doesn't (California's standards being based on the Common Core, which leaves American students 2 - 3 years behind their peers in East Asia and northern Europe), California's families remain well advised to opt out of state schooling wherever and whenever possible, until the overreach from both the federal and state capitals is brought to an end and local schools that want to pursue genuinely world - class excellence can thrive.

The critics of modern school reform that I know are people who see enormous trouble in the public education system, but don't think it will be fixed by spending billions of dollars on questionable teacher assessment systems linked to standardized test scores, or expanding charter schools that are hardly the panacea their early supporters claimed they would be, or handing out federal education dollars based on promises to change schools according to the likes and dislikes of Education Secretary Arne Duncan, whose record as superintendent of Chicago public schools was hardly distinguished.

Although our findings can not tell us whether states that adopted the CCSS would have done so during periods of relative economic strength or in the absence of the federal RTTT program, we were able to partially investigate the claim by examining the interaction of RTTT aspiration and state fiscal health.

Confirming the influence of the federal program on states» adoption behavior does not necessarily support the claims of federal coercion, however.

Because of the shift in claims from these federal statutes to claims being made under the Missouri Human Rights Act, today, our attorneys are often asked to defend claims of discrimination and harassment under state discrimination statutes and do so on a regular basis.

A lawsuit was filed in federal court on behalf of five students at Achievement First Crown Heights, claiming that the charter school did not provide mandated services «and were punished for behavior that arose from their disabilities.»

Former superintendent John Deasy, who resigned on Oct. 16 amid controversy over billion - dollar technology blunders, had declared a ban on the law this past August, claiming the law didn't apply to Los Angeles Unified because the district had received a federal waiver exempting it from No Child Left Behind improvement goals in the temporary absence of statewide tests.