Sentences with phrase «federal claims rejected»

Not exact matches

Jurors in the federal free speech lawsuit filed by James Tracy took just three hours to reject his claim that the university...
Federal Courts determined that the Mormon Church is not the original Church led by Joseph Smith as the decision over ownership of the only surviving Church from Joseph Smith's life, Kirkland Temple in Ohio; the Federal Court rejected the Mormon Church's claim of ownership.
In a 34 - page defence filed in the Federal Court in Melbourne on Monday, lawyers for Coles rejected key claims by the ACCC, which launched legal action in May, alleging that Coles used unfair tactics and misleading information to force about 200 suppliers to pay additional and ongoing rebates to participate in the program known as Active Retail Collaboration.
Refugee claimants from DCO countries have a faster claims process [2], and those whose are rejected can only appeal to the Federal Court system.
U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni in Manhattan rejected claims that federal law preempted New York and its Public Service Commission from offering credits to promote clean energy and reduce reliance on fossil - fueled or gas plants.
When Manhattan's federal appeals court vacated Silver's corruption conviction last week, it left open the door to a new trial by unanimously rejecting Silver's claim that the feds didn't present enough evidence to prove he took «pay - to - play» kickbacks.
Governor Ayodele Fayose of Ekiti State has rejected claims by the Department of State Services (DSS) that it uncovered plot by the Rivers State Governor, Mr. Nyesom Wike to disrupt governance in strategic federal government agencies in the federal capital.
NEW HAVEN — Former Congressional candidate Lisa Wilson - Foley Tuesday was ordered to serve five months in prison for concealing a campaign deal she struck with former Gov. John G. Rowland after a federal judge on Tuesday rejected her last minute claim that...
I am happy to hear that Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo will direct the state to cover the superstorm Sandy claims rejected by the Federal Emergency Management Agency under the «earth movement» exemption [«State to pay claims that FEMA rejected, News, Sept. 28].
In Patricia Caplinger v. Medtronic he rejected the plaintiff's claim to hold the Minnesota firm liable, pointing to federal law that bans states from imposing additional requirements on a device's safety or effectiveness.
A federal appeals court has rejected claims by a black educators» group that Las Vegas school officials intentionally segregated students.
After the Arizona Supreme Court rejected a similar Establishment Clause claim on the merits, respondents sought intervention from the Federal Judiciary.
While federal assistance has an ameliorating effect on the difference in school budgets between wealthy and poor districts, the District Court rejected an argument made by the State in that court that it should consider the effect of the federal grant in assessing the discrimination claim.
For example, in K.P. v. District of Columbia (2013), a federal district court rejected the parents» claim that the child's retention in grade based on truancy and academic failure proved that her IEP was not appropriate.
A federal district court rejected that claim in 2005, and the plaintiffs appealed.
A federal judge on Wednesday rejected Apple's claim of false advertising for Amazon.com to refer to its online shop for mobile gadget applications as an «app store.»
A federal judge has rejected a pet shop owner's claim that the city stomped on her «American dream» by banning the sale of commercially - bred puppies and kittens.
A federal judge in Rhode Island has rejected a pet shop's claim that a citywide ban on the sale of commercially - bred puppies and kittens was unconstitutional.
And a federal judge in Vermont strongly rejected automakers» claims about complying with the clean car law.
Work highlights Acted for Google in the Federal Circuit to defend a lower court judgment which rejected claims brought by Oracle, which alleged Google infringed Oracle's copyrights when Google used a portion of the Java platform to build the Android mobile device platform.
Provincial boards and authorities are required under federal legislation to apply their own provincial laws and policies, provided they do not conflict, and here the Commission's decision to reject the claim was reasonable.
Workers» Comp: Federal Employees; Chronic Stress; «Accidents»; Reasonableness Martin v. Alberta (Workers» Compensation Board (Alta.C.A., Aug. 29, 2012)(35052) Mar. 28, 2014 Provincial boards and authorities are required under federal legislation to apply their own provincial laws and policies, provided they do not conflict, and here the Commission's decision to reject the claim was reasFederal Employees; Chronic Stress; «Accidents»; Reasonableness Martin v. Alberta (Workers» Compensation Board (Alta.C.A., Aug. 29, 2012)(35052) Mar. 28, 2014 Provincial boards and authorities are required under federal legislation to apply their own provincial laws and policies, provided they do not conflict, and here the Commission's decision to reject the claim was reasfederal legislation to apply their own provincial laws and policies, provided they do not conflict, and here the Commission's decision to reject the claim was reasonable.
Received favorable and novel reported decision from New Jersey Federal District Court interpreting provisions of a Federal law offering long term care insurance to employees and retirees, which rejected a retiree's claim that the Federal law violated disability discrimination laws.
Moreover, just weeks after St. Simons and RFF were decided, the ABA House of Delegates passed a resolution urging all «federal, state, tribal, territorial and local legislative, judicial and other governmental bodies» to support applying the attorney - client privilege to protect from disclosure «confidential communications between law firm personnel and their firms» designated in - house counsel made for the purpose of the rendition of professional legal services to the law firm» and to reject any claim that conflict of interest principles or the «fiduciary exception» undermine that claim of privilege.
Specifically, the Tribunal held that the test for discrimination was the same in all cases and expressly rejected the family status test set out by the Federal Court of Appeal in Johnstone, which it viewed as creating a higher standard for family status claims than cases based on other forms of discrimination.
On October 4, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an en banc decision rejecting certain procedures adopted by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) limiting a patent owner's ability to amend claims during Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings under the America Invents Act.
To follow up on our story about Kentucky's Massey mine that is so unsafe that the Labor Department has moved to shut it down under federal supervision, last week, a federal judge rejected Massey's motion to dismiss the government's claim.
On redetermination of an accounting of profits, the Federal Court (FC) rejected Apotex's claim that the profits awarded to Servier due to Apotex's manufacture and sale of infringing perindopril should be reduced based on alleged non-infringing alternatives (NIAs).
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board correctly rejected a patent application relating to a dog mobility harness device because the applicant did not solely invent the claimed subject matter on which he asserted sole inventorship, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circui
On January 20, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its first patent decision of the current term, rejecting the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's long - standing practice of reviewing district court patent claim construction rulings, including subsidiary findings, without deference.
Brott v United States 858 F3d 425 (6th Cir 2017)(Amici Curiae National Federation of Independent Business, Cato Institute and Southeastern Legal Foundation)(rejecting claim that property owners were entitled to jury trial in an Article III court because Congress permitted to bestow exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over takings claims seeking more than $ 10,000 in the Court of Federal Cclaims seeking more than $ 10,000 in the Court of Federal ClaimsClaims)
Reporter Jordan Weissmann examines the U.S. Court of Federal Claims vaccine rulings that rejected claims from parents that childhood immunizations cause aClaims vaccine rulings that rejected claims from parents that childhood immunizations cause aclaims from parents that childhood immunizations cause autism.
The Federal Circuit rejected the plaintiff's Fifth Amendment, Seventh Amendment, and Article III claims against the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, holding that patents are «public rights» dependent on a government grant under Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50 (1982).
In rejecting an argument that a conversion claim against a towing company, which had sold a towed vehicle despite the owner's efforts to reclaim it, was preempted by federal law governing a «service» of motor carriers, the Second District cited an internet news story about the inventor of the tow truck.29 The court relied on facts from that article to make the temporal point that Florida law permitted claims for conversion of property before there were tow trucks.
A federal court rejects claims from Philadelphia cab companies: «Exposing Taxis to Competition from Uber and Lyft Is Not a Taking that Requires Compensation Under the Constitution» [Ilya Somin, Reason]
Martin v. Alberta (Workers» Compensation Board), 2014 SCC 25 (35052) Provincial boards and authorities are required under federal legislation to apply their own provincial laws and policies, provided they do not conflict, and here the Commission's decision to reject the claim was reasonable.
San Francisco — The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) will urge a federal appeals court Wednesday to reject Facebook's claims that it's a crime to workaround an IP address block — an interpretation of the law that could criminalize routine online behavior.
The Yankunytjatjara and Pitjantjatjara and other Indigenous people of the town of Yulara, in the shadows of Uluru, had their claim for compensation for extinguishment of native title rejected by Justice Sackville in the Federal Court (the Jango case) 1in 2006.
Alabama federal court rejected claims brought against an affiliated real estate brokerage and title company, finding that consumers had received the proper disclosure and the disclosure did not have to exactly replicate the language found in the RESPA regulations.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z