In 2003,
a federal court judge set out the rule for what has become known as a «legal hold.»
Peralta is currently in custody and on Tuesday a Manhattan
Federal Court judge set his bail at $ 5 million cash.
Not exact matches
The two sides were
set to face off in
court on Tuesday, but late on Monday a
federal judge in Riverside, California, agreed to the government's request to postpone the hearing after U.S. prosecutors said that a «third party» had presented a possible method for opening an encrypted iPhone.
A victory in the case, though, would potentially
set up a conflict among
federal judges that ultimately would have to be worked out by the Supreme
Court.
According to a notice posted in
federal court records on Monday,
Judge David Hurd
set an April 12 settlement hearing in Utica.
Seminerio pleaded guilty to services fraud before
Federal Court Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, who
set his sentencing -LSB-...]
MANHATTAN — A
federal court judge has halted the enforcement of controversial legislation targeting emergency pregnancy centers, which had been
set to go into effect Thursday.
During the arraignment, Manhattan
Federal Court Judge Valerie Caproni
set a Nov. 2 date for Silver's trial, the Associated Press reported.
But in a brief filed this week in
federal court, lawyers for the Justice Department tell U.S. District Court Judge Gary Sharpe that if he does set a primary for New York, that he make the date earlier than Aug
court, lawyers for the Justice Department tell U.S. District
Court Judge Gary Sharpe that if he does set a primary for New York, that he make the date earlier than Aug
Court Judge Gary Sharpe that if he does
set a primary for New York, that he make the date earlier than Aug. 18.
Smith and his co-defendants are
set to appear in
federal court on Jan. 31, when a
judge will
set their trial schedule.
Fani - Kayode added that the case had been assigned to a
judge and the date for arraignment had been
set for November 10 before Justice John Tsoho of the
Federal High
Court in Abuja.
U.S. District
Court Judge Gary Sharpe has
set June 26 to become the new primary date for
federal elections in New York in a long - awaited ruling handed down this afternoon.
The reason the issue is on the table is because of a 2012 decision by U.S. District
Court Judge Gary Sharpe requiring the state to
set federal primaries for the fourth Tuesday in June.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission is
set to charge suspended
Federal High
Court judge, Justice Mohammed Yunusa, who the National Judicial Commission recently recommended for retirement.
She was
set Tuesday to file a legal declaration with the U.S. District
Court, hoping to block Bloomberg's effort to put on hold a
judge's recommended reforms to stop - and - frisk, including a
federal monitor.
Jimmy Vielkind (Capital Confidential) reported on Thursday afternoon that a
federal three -
judge panel is poised to adopt a
set of
court - drawn congressional maps with minimal changes.
But Justice Gabriel Kolawole, in his judgment, delivered on July 1, 2015, held that he lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit while the June 8, 2015 judgment of the Lagos Division of the
Federal High
Court, nullifying the extradition application and affirmed by another judge of the same Lagos division on June 23, 2015, had not been set aside by any appellate c
Court, nullifying the extradition application and affirmed by another
judge of the same Lagos division on June 23, 2015, had not been
set aside by any appellate
courtcourt.
Seminerio pleaded guilty to services fraud before
Federal Court Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, who
set his sentencing for Oct. 20, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Lev Dassin said.
The Abuja division of the
Court of Appeal, on December 6, 2017
set aside order of then Chief
Judge of the
Federal High
Court...
But as Retraction Watch reports, a
federal district
court judge ruled that the
court lacked jurisdiction in this case because the plaintiffs haven't yet exhausted the administrative process
set up to handle misconduct investigations at federally funded labs.
On Thursday (29 December 2011),
Judge Lawrence O'Neill of the US District
Court for the Eastern District of California issued three separate rulings in a
set of
federal lawsuits challenging the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)(Rocky Mountain Farmers Union et al v. Goldstene).
Earlier this year a
federal district
court judge approved an agreement that requires the state to take «extraordinary measures» to address «one of the most segregated special - education
settings in the country.»
The judicial collision course was
set Friday when a
federal judge in San Francisco ruled that climate change lawsuits by two counties and one city were best adjudicated in California state
courts.
A U.S. District
Court in San Francisco will be the
setting for a first - ever hearing on the science of climate change, scheduled for March 21 by William Alsup, a
federal judge.
April 12, 2018:
Federal magistrate judge sets a new trial date: Oct. 29, 2018, in federal district court in Eugene,
Federal magistrate
judge sets a new trial date: Oct. 29, 2018, in
federal district court in Eugene,
federal district
court in Eugene, Oregon.
The presiding
judge - William Sessions III, sitting in the U.S. District
Court in Burlington - rejected the carmakers» argument that the proposed state rules conflicted with rules
set forth by the
federal government and that they imposed unnecessary and costly burdens on them:
A
federal judge in Vermont ruled in September that the state rules do not conflict with
federal mileage standards, and a Fresno
court in December found that both California and the EPA are empowered to
set limits on vehicle emissions.
If so many district
court judges decisions are in fact unreasonable, that would mean they are unfair, calling into question their ability to
set on the
federal bench.
Some flaws are structural; others involve poor management of the judiciary as a whole and of individual
courts and
judges; a third
set concerns «deficiencies in how
federal judges decide cases and justify their decisions in judicial opinions,» including a mechanical formalism and an unwillingness to confront openly the task of solving complex problems.
Because attorneys file summary judgment motions in state and in
federal courts, we also test whether there is a differential impact of readability on
judges» decisions in these two
sets of
courts.
David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times provides a news update headlined «High
court gives sentencing
judges more power; The justices» decision allows for greater ease in
setting lower prison terms under strict
federal cocaine laws.»
Although it is hard to be certain without more publicly available information, FISC
judges likely treat their opinions as non-precedential, as is standard practice for
federal district
courts.19 The relatively few public FISC opinions do cite earlier FISC opinions and principles of law, 20 but we have seen no clear evidence to suggest that the
judges feel formally bound by those earlier opinions in any manner that would
set them apart from other Article III district
courts.
JuraLaw provides
federal, state and local
court rule
sets across the nation as well as appellate, family, probate,
judges and agency rules.
The Minnesota Chapter of the
Federal Bar Association, with the generous assistance of the district's judges, has compiled a set of «Practice Pointers and Preferences» for federal court practit
Federal Bar Association, with the generous assistance of the district's
judges, has compiled a
set of «Practice Pointers and Preferences» for
federal court practit
federal court practitioners.