Sentences with phrase «federal court judge set»

In 2003, a federal court judge set out the rule for what has become known as a «legal hold.»
Peralta is currently in custody and on Tuesday a Manhattan Federal Court judge set his bail at $ 5 million cash.

Not exact matches

The two sides were set to face off in court on Tuesday, but late on Monday a federal judge in Riverside, California, agreed to the government's request to postpone the hearing after U.S. prosecutors said that a «third party» had presented a possible method for opening an encrypted iPhone.
A victory in the case, though, would potentially set up a conflict among federal judges that ultimately would have to be worked out by the Supreme Court.
According to a notice posted in federal court records on Monday, Judge David Hurd set an April 12 settlement hearing in Utica.
Seminerio pleaded guilty to services fraud before Federal Court Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, who set his sentencing -LSB-...]
MANHATTAN — A federal court judge has halted the enforcement of controversial legislation targeting emergency pregnancy centers, which had been set to go into effect Thursday.
During the arraignment, Manhattan Federal Court Judge Valerie Caproni set a Nov. 2 date for Silver's trial, the Associated Press reported.
But in a brief filed this week in federal court, lawyers for the Justice Department tell U.S. District Court Judge Gary Sharpe that if he does set a primary for New York, that he make the date earlier than Augcourt, lawyers for the Justice Department tell U.S. District Court Judge Gary Sharpe that if he does set a primary for New York, that he make the date earlier than AugCourt Judge Gary Sharpe that if he does set a primary for New York, that he make the date earlier than Aug. 18.
Smith and his co-defendants are set to appear in federal court on Jan. 31, when a judge will set their trial schedule.
Fani - Kayode added that the case had been assigned to a judge and the date for arraignment had been set for November 10 before Justice John Tsoho of the Federal High Court in Abuja.
U.S. District Court Judge Gary Sharpe has set June 26 to become the new primary date for federal elections in New York in a long - awaited ruling handed down this afternoon.
The reason the issue is on the table is because of a 2012 decision by U.S. District Court Judge Gary Sharpe requiring the state to set federal primaries for the fourth Tuesday in June.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission is set to charge suspended Federal High Court judge, Justice Mohammed Yunusa, who the National Judicial Commission recently recommended for retirement.
She was set Tuesday to file a legal declaration with the U.S. District Court, hoping to block Bloomberg's effort to put on hold a judge's recommended reforms to stop - and - frisk, including a federal monitor.
Jimmy Vielkind (Capital Confidential) reported on Thursday afternoon that a federal three - judge panel is poised to adopt a set of court - drawn congressional maps with minimal changes.
But Justice Gabriel Kolawole, in his judgment, delivered on July 1, 2015, held that he lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit while the June 8, 2015 judgment of the Lagos Division of the Federal High Court, nullifying the extradition application and affirmed by another judge of the same Lagos division on June 23, 2015, had not been set aside by any appellate cCourt, nullifying the extradition application and affirmed by another judge of the same Lagos division on June 23, 2015, had not been set aside by any appellate courtcourt.
Seminerio pleaded guilty to services fraud before Federal Court Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, who set his sentencing for Oct. 20, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Lev Dassin said.
The Abuja division of the Court of Appeal, on December 6, 2017 set aside order of then Chief Judge of the Federal High Court...
But as Retraction Watch reports, a federal district court judge ruled that the court lacked jurisdiction in this case because the plaintiffs haven't yet exhausted the administrative process set up to handle misconduct investigations at federally funded labs.
On Thursday (29 December 2011), Judge Lawrence O'Neill of the US District Court for the Eastern District of California issued three separate rulings in a set of federal lawsuits challenging the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)(Rocky Mountain Farmers Union et al v. Goldstene).
Earlier this year a federal district court judge approved an agreement that requires the state to take «extraordinary measures» to address «one of the most segregated special - education settings in the country.»
The judicial collision course was set Friday when a federal judge in San Francisco ruled that climate change lawsuits by two counties and one city were best adjudicated in California state courts.
A U.S. District Court in San Francisco will be the setting for a first - ever hearing on the science of climate change, scheduled for March 21 by William Alsup, a federal judge.
April 12, 2018: Federal magistrate judge sets a new trial date: Oct. 29, 2018, in federal district court in Eugene, Federal magistrate judge sets a new trial date: Oct. 29, 2018, in federal district court in Eugene, federal district court in Eugene, Oregon.
The presiding judge - William Sessions III, sitting in the U.S. District Court in Burlington - rejected the carmakers» argument that the proposed state rules conflicted with rules set forth by the federal government and that they imposed unnecessary and costly burdens on them:
A federal judge in Vermont ruled in September that the state rules do not conflict with federal mileage standards, and a Fresno court in December found that both California and the EPA are empowered to set limits on vehicle emissions.
If so many district court judges decisions are in fact unreasonable, that would mean they are unfair, calling into question their ability to set on the federal bench.
Some flaws are structural; others involve poor management of the judiciary as a whole and of individual courts and judges; a third set concerns «deficiencies in how federal judges decide cases and justify their decisions in judicial opinions,» including a mechanical formalism and an unwillingness to confront openly the task of solving complex problems.
Because attorneys file summary judgment motions in state and in federal courts, we also test whether there is a differential impact of readability on judges» decisions in these two sets of courts.
David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times provides a news update headlined «High court gives sentencing judges more power; The justices» decision allows for greater ease in setting lower prison terms under strict federal cocaine laws.»
Although it is hard to be certain without more publicly available information, FISC judges likely treat their opinions as non-precedential, as is standard practice for federal district courts.19 The relatively few public FISC opinions do cite earlier FISC opinions and principles of law, 20 but we have seen no clear evidence to suggest that the judges feel formally bound by those earlier opinions in any manner that would set them apart from other Article III district courts.
JuraLaw provides federal, state and local court rule sets across the nation as well as appellate, family, probate, judges and agency rules.
The Minnesota Chapter of the Federal Bar Association, with the generous assistance of the district's judges, has compiled a set of «Practice Pointers and Preferences» for federal court practitFederal Bar Association, with the generous assistance of the district's judges, has compiled a set of «Practice Pointers and Preferences» for federal court practitfederal court practitioners.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z