Sentences with phrase «federal court of appeal affirms»

Federal Court of Appeal Affirms Validity and Infringement of AstraZeneca's Omeprazole Formulation Patent but Amends Application of 6 - Year Limitation Period

In 1998's State Street Bank v. Signature Financial Group, the Federal Court of Appeals affirmed the patentability of business methods that involve some practical application and produce a useful, concrete, and tangible result.

The Federal Court of Appeal affirmed that plaintiffs» claims in negligence and breach of confidence were properly certified at first instance.

Not exact matches

A federal appeals court has affirmed four lower court judgments that debt collector Portfolio Recovery Associates violated federal law by failing to report to credit bureaus when consumers disputed the amount of debt they supposedly owed.

The Federal Court of Appeal recently affirmed this approach to environmental regulation in a case arising out of Alberta called Syncrude Canada Ltd. v Canada (Attorney General).

The Federal Court of Appeal then found that the Federal Government failed to properly consult Indigenous communities, but affirmed our engagement on the project.

A practicing lawyer, advising a legislative committee or governor, would predict the following: the law would meet immediate legal challenge and be struck down by a federal district court, which would be affirmed by the court of appeals.

Makarfi and members of his team are currently at the Supreme Court, where they filed an appeal against the judgment of a Federal High Court, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, which affirmed Sheriff as the national chairman of the troubled party.

A federal appeals court has affirmed the convictions of former state Senate Democratic Leader Malcolm Smith and Queens GOP official Vincent Tabone for scheming to get Smith's name on the 2013 New York City Republican mayoral primary ballot.

The Kaduna Division of the Court of Appeal today affirmed the decision of the Federal High Court Kano which ordered the interim forfeiture of...

Saraki's appeal filed through his lead counsel, Mr. Joseph Daudu (SAN), is challenging the majority judgment of the Court of Appeal in Abuja delivered on October 30, 2015, which affirmed the jurisdiction of the CCT to try him and the competence of the charges of false assets declaration preferred against him by the Federal Goverappeal filed through his lead counsel, Mr. Joseph Daudu (SAN), is challenging the majority judgment of the Court of Appeal in Abuja delivered on October 30, 2015, which affirmed the jurisdiction of the CCT to try him and the competence of the charges of false assets declaration preferred against him by the Federal GoverAppeal in Abuja delivered on October 30, 2015, which affirmed the jurisdiction of the CCT to try him and the competence of the charges of false assets declaration preferred against him by the Federal Government.

A five - man panel of the apex court led by Justice Tanko Muhammad unanimously affirmed the February 20, 2015, judgment of the Court of Appeal in Lagos which had overturned the Federal High Court's decision striking out the chacourt led by Justice Tanko Muhammad unanimously affirmed the February 20, 2015, judgment of the Court of Appeal in Lagos which had overturned the Federal High Court's decision striking out the chaCourt of Appeal in Lagos which had overturned the Federal High Court's decision striking out the chaCourt's decision striking out the charges.

But the Calabar Division of the Court of Appeal on December 6, 2013, dismissed the commission's appeal and affirmed the judgment of the Federal High Appeal on December 6, 2013, dismissed the commission's appeal and affirmed the judgment of the Federal High appeal and affirmed the judgment of the Federal High Court.

The federal district court affirmed the Department of Education's decision, as did the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, applying the Supreme Court's reasoning in the Rowley decicourt affirmed the Department of Education's decision, as did the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, applying the Supreme Court's reasoning in the Rowley deciCourt of Appeals, applying the Supreme Court's reasoning in the Rowley deciCourt's reasoning in the Rowley decision.

After the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed their right to do so, in AEP v. Connecticut, the Supreme Court reversed on the grounds that such claims were «displaced by the federal legislation authorizing EPA to regulate carbon - dioxide emissions.»

«That panel decision was subsequently affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which set aside an $ 86.5 million infringement verdict won by the company,» says the NLJ.

The Commission then appealed to the federal Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which affirmed the district court's judgment on July 13, Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which affirmed the district court's judgment on July 13, court's judgment on July 13, 2009.

The Court affirmed the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, holding that the USPTO acted within its authority in promulgating rules requiring the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to...

Steve Goldman obtained summary judgment for our client in the federal district court for the Northern District of Florida and successfully argued the appeal before the Eleventh Circuit, which affirmed the judgment in favor of our client.

The nation's only court that operates in secrecy, the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, may not have a Web site of its own, like other federal appeals courts, but its decision this week affirming the government's broad power to investigate suspected spies and terrorists made it onto thecourt that operates in secrecy, the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, may not have a Web site of its own, like other federal appeals courts, but its decision this week affirming the government's broad power to investigate suspected spies and terrorists made it onto theCourt of Review, may not have a Web site of its own, like other federal appeals courts, but its decision this week affirming the government's broad power to investigate suspected spies and terrorists made it onto the Web.

Ancora v. Apple — Appeal to Federal Circuit & Petition for Certiorari Handled & argued appeal on behalf of Ancora reversing district court's claim construction of term «program,» and affirming district's court's finding of no indefinitAppeal to Federal Circuit & Petition for Certiorari Handled & argued appeal on behalf of Ancora reversing district court's claim construction of term «program,» and affirming district's court's finding of no indefinitappeal on behalf of Ancora reversing district court's claim construction of term «program,» and affirming district's court's finding of no indefiniteness.

The decision affirmed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and endorsed the USPTO's positions on both issues.

The Federal Court of Appeal then found that the Federal Government failed to properly consult Indigenous communities, but affirmed our engagement on the project.

«The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court's judgment that Merck could not collect the award because of its «unclean hands» in procuring the two patents asserted against Gilead Sciences Inc.,» writes Tony DCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court's judgment that Merck could not collect the award because of its «unclean hands» in procuring the two patents asserted against Gilead Sciences Inc.,» writes Tony Dcourt's judgment that Merck could not collect the award because of its «unclean hands» in procuring the two patents asserted against Gilead Sciences Inc.,» writes Tony Dutra.

Participated in an appeal on behalf of a Fortune 500 company to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which affirmed a summary judgment in a multi-million dollar federal court employment discrimination laCourt of Appeals, which affirmed a summary judgment in a multi-million dollar federal court employment discrimination lacourt employment discrimination lawsuit

FlashPoint appealed the Commission's determination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which affirmed the Commission's decision in favor of HTC less than a week after oral arguments.

In an unusual en banc decision rendered without requesting briefing from the parties, the United States, or interested amici curiae, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently affirmed several rulings in favor of Apple Inc. in its ongoing smartphone patent war with Samsung.

The Court affirmed the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, holding that the USPTO acted within its authority in promulgating rules requiring the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to construe patent claims in inter partes review proceedings under the «broadest reasonable interpretation» (or «BRI») standard.

So far, only three published studies have analyzed the association between brief readability and case outcome, 50 and no studies have analyzed that association in the trial courts, where most lawyers practice.51 Long and Christensen sampled 882 appellate briefs from the Supreme Court, federal appellate courts, and state supreme courts.52 Their dependent variable was the outcome of the appeal (affirmed or reversed), while their independent variable was readability measured by the Flesch Reading Ease score as calculated by Microsoft Word.53 For federal appellate and state supreme court briefs, the researchers coded control variables for federal or state court, standard of review, presence of a dissenting opinion, and readability of the opinion deciding the appeal.54 For United States Supreme Court briefs, the researchers coded control variables for constitutional issue, criminal or civil case, presence of a dissenting opinion, and opinion readability.55 They found no statistically significant correlation between readability and outcome in the briefs in their stuCourt, federal appellate courts, and state supreme courts.52 Their dependent variable was the outcome of the appeal (affirmed or reversed), while their independent variable was readability measured by the Flesch Reading Ease score as calculated by Microsoft Word.53 For federal appellate and state supreme court briefs, the researchers coded control variables for federal or state court, standard of review, presence of a dissenting opinion, and readability of the opinion deciding the appeal.54 For United States Supreme Court briefs, the researchers coded control variables for constitutional issue, criminal or civil case, presence of a dissenting opinion, and opinion readability.55 They found no statistically significant correlation between readability and outcome in the briefs in their stucourt briefs, the researchers coded control variables for federal or state court, standard of review, presence of a dissenting opinion, and readability of the opinion deciding the appeal.54 For United States Supreme Court briefs, the researchers coded control variables for constitutional issue, criminal or civil case, presence of a dissenting opinion, and opinion readability.55 They found no statistically significant correlation between readability and outcome in the briefs in their stucourt, standard of review, presence of a dissenting opinion, and readability of the opinion deciding the appeal.54 For United States Supreme Court briefs, the researchers coded control variables for constitutional issue, criminal or civil case, presence of a dissenting opinion, and opinion readability.55 They found no statistically significant correlation between readability and outcome in the briefs in their stuCourt briefs, the researchers coded control variables for constitutional issue, criminal or civil case, presence of a dissenting opinion, and opinion readability.55 They found no statistically significant correlation between readability and outcome in the briefs in their study.56

-- Represented Ancora in successful appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversing district court's claim construction ruling and affirming district's court's finding of no indefiniteCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversing district court's claim construction ruling and affirming district's court's finding of no indefinitecourt's claim construction ruling and affirming district's court's finding of no indefinitecourt's finding of no indefiniteness.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently affirmed a decision by the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) invalidating two patents after an inter partes review proceeding, even though the decision partially rested on references and evidence not disclosed in the challenger's petition for review or the PTAB's decision to institute.

This later patent (No. 5,946,647 shown below) has just now been returned to the Samsung litigation based upon an order by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which in an opinion last Friday (April 25, 2014) revived the patent by affirming a claim construction by Judge Richard A. Posner from a different case by Apple against Motorola — Judge Posner's claim construction contrasted with that of Judge Luch Koh in the Samsung litigation.

Earlier this month, the Federal Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued a written opinion affirming an $ 11 million jury verdict in a product liability case brought by a man who was injured while using a ladder manufactured by the defendant.

The decision was recently affirmed by a federal court of appeals.

The Court of Appeal affirmed, following the Federal Court of Appeal's decision in Apotex Inc. v. Allergan Inc., 2016 FCA 155, that «Evidence of the actual state of mind or subjective intention of the parties is irrelevant to the existence of a valid contract and its terms» (See para. 35).

The District Court ruled by summary judgment that SCA's suit was barred by laches (an equitable doctrine that prevents the plaintiff from unreasonably delaying in bringing an action), a decision that was affirmed by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

The federal district court granted their motion, and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismicourt granted their motion, and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismiCourt of Appeals affirmed the dismissal.

«[T] he weight of authority suggests that accurate news reporting — even when it is likely to have an adverse impact on the subjects of the report — usually does not give rise to an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress»: Yesterday, a unanimous three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a decision affirming a federal district court's dismissal of claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress asserted by two former undercover police officers against a television station in Albuquerque that had revealed their identities and their undercover status in the context of a televised report about their suspected involvement in an alleged incident of sexual assCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a decision affirming a federal district court's dismissal of claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress asserted by two former undercover police officers against a television station in Albuquerque that had revealed their identities and their undercover status in the context of a televised report about their suspected involvement in an alleged incident of sexual asscourt's dismissal of claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress asserted by two former undercover police officers against a television station in Albuquerque that had revealed their identities and their undercover status in the context of a televised report about their suspected involvement in an alleged incident of sexual assault.

Fair or not, the perception of the Federal Circuit among some practitioners is that a trial court's claim construction only has a 50/50 chance of being affirmed on appeal.

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed a district court order enjoining state court plaintiffs from pursuing a class action because the district court had already denied certification of an identical class in federal cCourt of Appeals recently affirmed a district court order enjoining state court plaintiffs from pursuing a class action because the district court had already denied certification of an identical class in federal ccourt order enjoining state court plaintiffs from pursuing a class action because the district court had already denied certification of an identical class in federal ccourt plaintiffs from pursuing a class action because the district court had already denied certification of an identical class in federal ccourt had already denied certification of an identical class in federal courtcourt.

Following Covington's argument in April 2015, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's decision, securing the clients» victory.

The case, Impression Products v. Lexmark International, is on appeal from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, who last year affirmed its own precedent allowing patent holders to restrict how consumers can use the products they buy.

In a long running legal battle over patent infringement allegations, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a California federal court's decision that Move's websites, including REALTOR®.com, do not infringe Real Estate Alliance, Ltd.'s pFederal Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a California federal court's decision that Move's websites, including REALTOR®.com, do not infringe Real Estate Alliance, Ltd.'s patCourt of Appeals affirmed a California federal court's decision that Move's websites, including REALTOR®.com, do not infringe Real Estate Alliance, Ltd.'s pfederal court's decision that Move's websites, including REALTOR®.com, do not infringe Real Estate Alliance, Ltd.'s patcourt's decision that Move's websites, including REALTOR®.com, do not infringe Real Estate Alliance, Ltd.'s patents.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit affirmed the ruling of the trial court, finding that the mortgage broker did not meet the definitions of a creditor as set by the Act or by Regulation Z, the implementation regulation issued by the Federal Reserve for theCourt of Appeals for the 10th Circuit affirmed the ruling of the trial court, finding that the mortgage broker did not meet the definitions of a creditor as set by the Act or by Regulation Z, the implementation regulation issued by the Federal Reserve for thecourt, finding that the mortgage broker did not meet the definitions of a creditor as set by the Act or by Regulation Z, the implementation regulation issued by the Federal Reserve for the Act.

A federal appeals court has affirmed that a class - action lawsuit can proceed against a mortgage lender for alleged violations of the RESPA anti-kickback provisions in a case previously summarized in The Letter of the Law.

The Court affirmed the rulings of the lower court, resolving a split among federal circuit courts of apCourt affirmed the rulings of the lower court, resolving a split among federal circuit courts of apcourt, resolving a split among federal circuit courts of appeal.

HARTFORD — A federal appeals court here has ruled Megan's Law constitutional, affirming that states have the right to notify communities of the presence of a sex offender.