Sentences with phrase «federal court of appeal confirms»

Federal Court of Appeal Confirms Federally - Regulated Employers» Right to Dismiss Non-Unionized Employees Without Cause

Not only did the Federal Court of Appeal confirm that solicitor - client privilege encompasses common - interest privilege, but also the court held that Abacus's and Gillis's common interests warranted a finding that solicitor - client privilege protected the tax - planning memo from disclosure to the CRA:

The Federal Court of Appeal confirmed that non-unionized employees do not have a «right to a job» and may be dismissed by their employer without cause

The Federal Court of Appeal confirmed the Federal Court's decision.

Recently, the Federal Court of Appeal confirmed that a tax debtor's bankruptcy does not extinguish the federal Crown's priority to proceeds a secured creditor obtains from that tax debtor's assets before its bankruptcy.

On March 6, the Federal Court of Appeal confirmed that common interest privilege (CIP) protects the sharing, between parties to a commercial transaction, of communications that are subject to solicitor - client privilege (SCP).

Recently, the Federal Court of Appeal confirmed that a tax debtor's bankruptcy does not extinguish the federal Crown's priority to...

In a suit by Canada Post, the trial court decided that the USPS was not a «public authority» for the purposes of this act, and the Federal Court of Appeal confirmed that decision earlier this year.

Not exact matches

When contacted on Friday, a senior lawyer in the CAU of the Federal Ministry of Justice, Mr. Pius Akutah, confirmed that following the judgment of the Court of Appeal setting aside the rulings from the courts in Lagos, the extradition suit would be refiled as soon and the US government sent a fresh request for the senator.

On March 18, in Keewatin v. Ontario (Natural Resources) the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed that in exercising its rights and powers as beneficial owner, Ontario is not subject to federal consent when taking up Crown land for resource projects.

The 15 months delay was confirmed by the Federal Court of Appeal on May 30th 2012.

At the Federal Court of Appeal, the essential elements of the Federal Court disposition with regard to required accessibility were confirmed even though some elements of the first instance decision were varied, especially to remove the declaration of infringement by the government and the disposition to the effect that the Federal Court was keeping jurisdiction to ensure the effect of its declaration (Canada (Attorney General) v. Jodhan, 2012 FCA 161 (CanLII)-RRB-.

In sum, the Federal Court of Appeal's decision confirmed the integrity of solicitor - client privilege in cases where a person shares her lawyer's legal advice with commonly interested parties to a transaction.

A collective sigh of relief reverberated across the tax and corporate law bar when, on March 6, 2018, the Federal Court of Appeal released its reasons in Iggillis Holdings Inc. v Canada (National Revenue), 1 confirming the availability of common interest privilege in the context of a commercial transaction.

«Judges Press C.I.A. Lawyer Over Withheld Documents»: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, «A federal appeals court panel in Manhattan questioned a lawyer for the federal government yesterday as to whether the Central Intelligence Agency had a legitimate national security interest in refusing to confirm or deny the existence of documents authorizing it to detain and interrogate terrorism suspects overseas.»

A Competition Bureau spokeswoman confirmed TREB «has applied to the Federal Court of Appeal to stay the Competition Tribunal's order, pending resolution of TREB's appeal.&Appeal to stay the Competition Tribunal's order, pending resolution of TREB's appeal.&appeal.»

The Federal Court overturned a previous decision by the Commissioner of Patents confirming the analysis of the Patent Appeal Board reviewing the final rejection issued by the Examiner in charge, and stated that Amazon.com's patent application constitutes statutory subject matter in accordance with the Patent Act.

On appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal (2013 FCA 75) the court confirmed the procedural fairness ruling of the Federal Court (at paragraphs 24 appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal (2013 FCA 75) the court confirmed the procedural fairness ruling of the Federal Court (at paragraphs 24 -Court of Appeal (2013 FCA 75) the court confirmed the procedural fairness ruling of the Federal Court (at paragraphs 24 Appeal (2013 FCA 75) the court confirmed the procedural fairness ruling of the Federal Court (at paragraphs 24 -court confirmed the procedural fairness ruling of the Federal Court (at paragraphs 24 -Court (at paragraphs 24 - 26):

Essentially, the Federal Court of Appeal in the Johnstone and Seeley cases confirmed the following key points:

The Supreme Court of Canada eventually confirmed the federal government's right to provide maternity and parental benefits to workers under the federal Employment Insurance program, and overturned the 2004 ruling where in the Quebec Court of Appeal ruled that the federal government's special EI benefits program was unconstitutional.

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit just issued a new decision confirming that Vermont's lawsuit against alleged patent troll MPHJ can stay in Vermont state cCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit just issued a new decision confirming that Vermont's lawsuit against alleged patent troll MPHJ can stay in Vermont state courtcourt.