Sentences with phrase «federal decision highlights»

Not exact matches

BlackRock's Rick Rieder believes there are several factors behind the Federal Reserve's decision to not raise its benchmark rate, but highlights one particular trend to keep an eye on.

1)[The recent decisions of federal district judges Nicholas Garaufis and Shira Scheindlin in cases involving the New York City Fire and Police Departments HIGHLIGHTS....]

The recent decisions of federal district judges Nicholas Garaufis and Shira Scheindlin in cases involving the New York City Fire and Police Departments highlights the importance of the Senate's role in recommending federal judges to the President and in confirming judges who are neutral arbiters of disputes.

The video highlighted the following points: ESSA reduces federal authority over school decisions and gives it back to the states and local districts.

The Federal Reserve's (Fed) decision to delay raising interest rates in the wake of fears over the health of China's economy highlights the conundrum facing central bankers, so when will interest rates rise and will I be dead before rates match GDP growth rates («neutralise») again?

Work highlights Appeared in the Supreme Court for Life Technologies to reverse a Federal Circuit decision in a patent infringement case, successfully arguing that the supply of a single component of a multicomponent patented invention for manufacture abroad does not give rise to liability under the Patent Act.

Work highlights Represented Impression Products against Lexmark in the Supreme Court to reverse a Federal Circuit decision which had found a patentee may impose patent - based post-sale restrictions on an article's use or resale regardless of the patent exhaustion doctrine and that foreign sales do not exhaust US patent rights.

It highlights new court decisions, new state and federal laws and policies, and actions at the local government level that guide and / or impact land use and community development.

LegalTech News has highlighted some early decisions applying the 2015 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

As Judge Nancy Gertner highlighted in her Mueffleman decision (available here), in the federal system the major decisions about the imposition of punishment have been made by Congress and the Sentencing Commission (an administrative agency).

The recent decision of Lehigh Cement Ltd. v. R., in which the Federal Court of Appeal overturned the application of GAAR, highlights the Crown's difficulty.

Attached is a Summary by David Debold from Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Entitled: «Two Supreme Court Decisions in December 2007 Highlight the Advisory Nature of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines».

The decision, however, highlights the paradox of our federal government responding to an important issue of public policy by adopting legislation (the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act) that mandates compliance with rules governing the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information, but at the same time not equipping the privacy commissioner with powers to enforce compliance or punish violators.

Several decisions of the Federal Court in relation to endangered species issues or other regulatory matters, like pest management, have highlighted serious deficiencies in decision making or actions from the federal government's minisFederal Court in relation to endangered species issues or other regulatory matters, like pest management, have highlighted serious deficiencies in decision making or actions from the federal government's minisfederal government's ministers...

WASHINGTON, DC — At a Congressional Briefing sponsored by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D - NJ), Rep. Barbara Lee (D - CA), and Rep. Lucille Roybal - Allard (D - CA), experts from Planned Parenthood and the Guttmacher Institute highlighted the need for increased federal funding of comprehensive sex education programs that provide young people with accurate information to make responsible decisions about their health.