Sentences with phrase «federal district court rejects»

Continue Reading Federal District Court Rejects Craft Brewers» Equal Protection and Due Process Challenge of Texas» Ban on Brewer Off - Premises Retailing

For example, in K.P. v. District of Columbia (2013), a federal district court rejected the parents» claim that the child's retention in grade based on truancy and academic failure proved that her IEP was not appropriate.

A federal district court rejected that claim in 2005, and the plaintiffs appealed.

Not exact matches

The Obama administration decided to block construction on federal land shortly after a U.S. District Court judge rejected a request from Native Americans for a court order to block the proCourt judge rejected a request from Native Americans for a court order to block the procourt order to block the project.

Jack Martins is considering an appeal to Tuesday's federal court decision that rejected his bid to move the general election for the 3rd Congressional District to December.

ALBANY — Republican Jack Martins is considering an appeal to Tuesday's federal court decision that rejected his bid to move the general election for the 3rd Congressional District to December.

These groups filed a legal challenge in Hawaii shortly before launch in 1997, but the challenge was rejected by the federal district court in Hawaii and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appcourt in Hawaii and the Ninth Circuit Court of AppCourt of Appeals.

While federal assistance has an ameliorating effect on the difference in school budgets between wealthy and poor districts, the District Court rejected an argument made by the State in that court that it should consider the effect of the federal grant in assessing the discrimination cCourt rejected an argument made by the State in that court that it should consider the effect of the federal grant in assessing the discrimination ccourt that it should consider the effect of the federal grant in assessing the discrimination claim.

A federal judge has rejected a request by the Cleveland Board of Education to declare the district «unitary,» or desegregated, and end court jurisdiction over it.

Similarly, in Eric V. v. Causby (1997), a federal district court in North Carolina rejected a preliminary injunction in a class action challenge based on both federal constitutional and statutory grounds.

And in Giles v. Shaw School District (2016), a federal appellate court rejected the sex discrimination suit of a principal in the wake of the nonrenewal of her contract because of «failing» ratings of her school.

The presiding judge - William Sessions III, sitting in the U.S. District Court in Burlington - rejected the carmakers» argument that the proposed state rules conflicted with rules set forth by the federal government and that they imposed unnecessary and costly burdens on them:

Well, at least almonds, according to a recent federal district court ruling against a group of California almond growers.A federal judge has rejected a challenge by fifteen California organic almond growers to halt the mandatory treatment of raw almonds as required by the Almond Board of California.

As I discussed here last year, in July 2010 a federal district court in Denver ruled that the act violates free speech, and rejected the argument that lying about having military medals dilutes their meaning and significance.

Received favorable and novel reported decision from New Jersey Federal District Court interpreting provisions of a Federal law offering long term care insurance to employees and retirees, which rejected a retiree's claim that the Federal law violated disability discrimination laws.

On a petition for writ of mandamus, the Federal Circuit ordered the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas to transfer venue of a patent action — rejecting the four - part venue test proposed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in TC Heartland LLC...

The judge, Thomas F. Hogan of Federal District Court in Washington, rejected a request by Ms. Miller and her lawyers that she be allowed to serve her detention at home or in Connecticut or elsewhere, and ordered that she be put in custody and taken to a jail in the District of Columbia area until October, or until she changed her mind about testifying.

Even though the case law Samsung cites gives Judge Koh more than enough ammunition to at least stay the case, Samsung's lawyers also present an argument that would enable the district court to reject Apple's demand for premature enforcement even if the court interpreted the Federal Circuit's mandate the way Apple proposes: «Manifest injustice would warrant deviation from a decision rejecting, without briefing, collateral estoppel or a stay»

On January 20, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its first patent decision of the current term, rejecting the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's long - standing practice of reviewing district court patent claim construction rulings, including subsidiary findings, without deferCourt handed down its first patent decision of the current term, rejecting the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's long - standing practice of reviewing district court patent claim construction rulings, including subsidiary findings, without deferCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's long - standing practice of reviewing district court patent claim construction rulings, including subsidiary findings, without defercourt patent claim construction rulings, including subsidiary findings, without deference.

In rejecting an argument that a conversion claim against a towing company, which had sold a towed vehicle despite the owner's efforts to reclaim it, was preempted by federal law governing a «service» of motor carriers, the Second District cited an internet news story about the inventor of the tow truck.29 The court relied on facts from that article to make the temporal point that Florida law permitted claims for conversion of property before there were tow trucks.

A unanimous Court (8 - 0, Thomas writing, Gorsuch not participating) rejected the broad reading of a venue statute by which the Federal Circuit had empowered lawyers to forum - shop disputes from all over the country into a few decidedly pro-plaintiff venues, above all the largely rural Eastern District of Texas.