Sentences with phrase «federal district court issued»

On Monday, Judge Kimba M. Wood of Federal District Court issued an order rescheduling Mr. Skelos's sentencing for 10 a.m. on April 13.

Not exact matches

He has also filed amicus briefs in landmark patent and other cases to district courts, the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court involving patenting issues relevant to biotechnology.

On May 2, 2012, a federal indictment was issued for Meza - Flores in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia after he was charged with Conspiracy to Distribute Five Kilograms or More of Cocaine, Fifty Grams or More of Methamphetamine, One Kilogram or More of Heroin, and One Thousand Kilograms or More of Marijuana for Importation into the United States; and Use of a Firearm.

She's not acting on behalf of the Supreme Court; she is acting under her own (pretty vast) authority as a federal judge under Article III of the Constitution, and issuing the order from a district cCourt; she is acting under her own (pretty vast) authority as a federal judge under Article III of the Constitution, and issuing the order from a district courtcourt.

Also at 10 a.m., there's a federal court hearing on the temporary restraining order issued on Trump's first immigration - related executive order, Eastern District, 225 Cadman Plaza, Courtroom 10D, Brooklyn.

The reason the issue is on the table is because of a 2012 decision by U.S. District Court Judge Gary Sharpe requiring the state to set federal primaries for the fourth Tuesday in June.

The judge, Valerie E. Caproni of Federal District Court, did not unseal the materials at the time, but the issue arose again after the trial ended, when the office of Preet Bharara, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, asked to be allowed to use the materials at Mr. Silver's sentencing, which is scheduled for May 3.

In April 2010, Rep. Meeks officially notified then - House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D - CA) he had been served with a subpoena for documents issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; press reports said the subpoena was tied to the federal corruption probe into the nonprofits tied to Rep. Meeks and other Queens politicians.

Then, on 22 November, federal judge Amos L. Mazzant of the Eastern District of Texas issued an injunction that put implementation of the new rule on hold until the court could decide lawsuits brought against it by a number of states and employers.

On July 2, 2003, a federal district court judge in Idaho issued his decision in Natural Resources Defense Council, et.

On Thursday (29 December 2011), Judge Lawrence O'Neill of the US District Court for the Eastern District of California issued three separate rulings in a set of federal lawsuits challenging the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)(Rocky Mountain Farmers Union et al v. Goldstene).

On August 23, 2010, Judge Royce Lamberth of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued a preliminary injunction against the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines allowing federal dollars to fund projects in which embryos were destroyed to derive new stem cell lines.

U.S. District Judge Adrian Duplantier of New Orleans has postponed the American Civil Liberties Union's suit against Louisiana's «scientific - creationism» law until a separate suit on the issue before another federal district court has been District Judge Adrian Duplantier of New Orleans has postponed the American Civil Liberties Union's suit against Louisiana's «scientific - creationism» law until a separate suit on the issue before another federal district court has been district court has been decided.

Over time, key court decisions, as well as later revisions to the federal law and regulations issued by federal agencies, have spelled out the rights of students and the obligations of school districts.

NSBA is pleased to report that a federal district court judge in New York has issued a nationwide preliminary injunction in Vidal v. Nielsen (New York v. Trump), a case in which NSBA and other national educational organizations filed an amicus brief supporting plaintiffs challenging the DACA rescission.

Federal courts issue desegregation orders when they find that districts or states are maintaining separate educational facilities and systems for students of different races.

Surfrider received a ruling in our favor from the federal District Court in January 2015, but the issue has been appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

In October 2007, federal district court Judge Robert Chambers ruled in favor of Gunnoe and OVEC and issued an injunction, ordering Jupiter Holdings to halt the construction of any new valley fills at its Boone County mine.

Pruitt also said that the CPP is inconsistent with the Clean Air Act, which is a legally dubious claim, according to environmental law experts, who say the issue is still under litigation in U.S. federal district court in Washington, D.C.

Prior to joining Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, he served as a Judicial Clerk to the Hon. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Federal District Court for the District of South Carolina where he prepared briefs and memoranda in preparation for judicial determination, provided research assistance, and drafted opinions and orders on a wide array of legal issues.

On appeal, Esso argued that he was denied a fair trial when the district court allowed the jury to take home the copy of the indictment — an issue that the Second Circuit said appeared to be one of first impression in any federal or state court.

the US Federal Circuit (FC) reversed a District Court patent eligibility holding, highlighting the need for technical advantages in patent specifications to avoid US eligibility issues and the potential advantages of US attorneys drafting more detailed specifications.

A simple search of published court decisions shows that Wikipedia is frequently cited by judges around the country, involving serious issues and the bizarre — such as a 2005 tax case before the Tennessee Court of Appeals concerning the definition of «beverage» that involved hundreds of thousands of dollars, and, just this week, a case in Federal District Court in Florida that involved the term «booty music» as played during a wet T - shirt concourt decisions shows that Wikipedia is frequently cited by judges around the country, involving serious issues and the bizarre — such as a 2005 tax case before the Tennessee Court of Appeals concerning the definition of «beverage» that involved hundreds of thousands of dollars, and, just this week, a case in Federal District Court in Florida that involved the term «booty music» as played during a wet T - shirt conCourt of Appeals concerning the definition of «beverage» that involved hundreds of thousands of dollars, and, just this week, a case in Federal District Court in Florida that involved the term «booty music» as played during a wet T - shirt conCourt in Florida that involved the term «booty music» as played during a wet T - shirt contest.

Federal civil subpoenas seeking the production of documents must issue from the court in the district where the production is to be made.

Some Federal District Court judges have issued orders precluding counsel from inquiring into a party's immigration status during discovery.

Facing the question whether the TTAB's earlier decision on the issue of likelihood of confusion should have been binding on the district court, the Supreme Court held that decisions by the TTAB may be binding on a federal district court considering the same or similar icourt, the Supreme Court held that decisions by the TTAB may be binding on a federal district court considering the same or similar iCourt held that decisions by the TTAB may be binding on a federal district court considering the same or similar icourt considering the same or similar issue.

Similarly, a district court may be called upon to decide these same issues when a trademark owner sues in federal court for trademark infringement.

Litigation in the US Tax Court, the US Court of Federal Claims, and multiple federal district and appellate courts, with experience ranging from partnership tax litigation, research and development credit litigation, fringe benefits and payroll tax litigation, transfer pricing litigation, and numerous other domestic and internationalFederal Claims, and multiple federal district and appellate courts, with experience ranging from partnership tax litigation, research and development credit litigation, fringe benefits and payroll tax litigation, transfer pricing litigation, and numerous other domestic and internationalfederal district and appellate courts, with experience ranging from partnership tax litigation, research and development credit litigation, fringe benefits and payroll tax litigation, transfer pricing litigation, and numerous other domestic and international issues

If a forum state's courts have «general jurisdiction» over a defendant, this means that the defendant can be sued in that forum on any cause of action against that defendant arising anywhere in the world, regardless of any other relationship that the claim has to the forum state (except for claims in the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts which can be brought in a U.S. District Court located in the same state, or in an arbitration forum pursuant to a valid arbitration clause that binds the parties, an issue beyond the scope of this question and answer).

The 9th Circuit upheld the Hawaii federal district court decision, focusing primarily on a federal statute that bars discrimination in issuing visas based on national origin or country of residence and also on separation of powers considerations.

A federal district court in Hawaii issued an injunction and, in December 2017, the 9th Circuit affirmed.

Moreover, criminal justice issues — not just sentencing, but also search and trial and habeas issues — comprise roughly 1/3 of the SCOTUS docket and this is the bread + butter of the work of federal district courts.

The Court could decide that Pennsylvania should join the other 48 states (and every federal district) in allowing experts on eyewitness identification issues to testify at trial.

Mr. Whitney's representative work includes a series of successful outcomes pursuing false advertising claims against product review websites, a landmark victory clarifying copyright fair use and parody on behalf of several well - known musicians; a defense win dismissing copyright infringement claims brought by a putative class of attorneys against the leading legal research websites; a favorable outcome for a high - end beauty products company in a trademark and trade dress action against a manufacturer of knock - off products; a district and appellate court decision dismissing all claims by a proposed class against an international bank for alleged violations of, among other things, the Federal False Marking Act, RICO and the CAN - SPAM Act; and counseling prominent art museums and galleries on domestic and international copyright issues.

Genuine issues of fact precluded summary judgment on a consumer's claims against a seafood producer for allegedly making unlawful, false, and misleading advertising regarding the omega - 3 nutrient content of certain of its products in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL), False Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the federal district court in San Jose has ruled (Ogden v. Bumble Bee Food, LLC, January 2, 2014, Koh, L.).

Focusing on a diverse range of issues, he has tried jury cases in federal courts around the country, and has appeared in more than 25 different district courts and six courts of appeal.

The complaint, filed in Manhattan federal district court, names Kasowitz Benson, partner Eric Wallach, and public relations firm Sitrick and Company, which issued the January press release.

It will have to raise issues relating to Judge Koh's consideration of the «Hauser conjoint survey», a piece of evidence that the Federal Circuit said in the previous appeal the district court must consider.

As reported in our prior Update, in a decision issued on January 22, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense, 138 S. Ct. 617, that challenges to the Obama administration's 2015 Clean Water Rule must be brought in federal district courts, rather than directly in the federal courts of appeals.

By: Paul L. Bressan November 23, 2016 On Tuesday, November 22, a federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a -LSB-...]

[5] Although no federal appellate court decision has yet addressed the issue, there currently is a split in authority at the district court level as to whether the limitations periods for FMLA (and, by analogy, FLSA and EPA) claims may be contractually shortened.

In addition, although the Federal Circuit has not addressed the broader issue, patent owners should expect that short of actual disclaimer, all statements made during AIA post grant proceedings, including statements in expert reports, will be considered «intrinsic» evidence that a district court may consider, along with the patent specification and prosecution history, in conducting claim construction.

Faculty The Honorable Avern L. Cohn, Senior Judge, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan The Honorable Frank Maas, Chief Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York The Honorable Lisa M. Smith, Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Course Description A panel of sitting federal judges address a range of issues in awarding attorney fees and expenses in large, complex litigation in federal cCourt for the Eastern District of Michigan The Honorable Frank Maas, Chief Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York The Honorable Lisa M. Smith, Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Course Description A panel of sitting federal judges address a range of issues in awarding attorney fees and expenses in large, complex litigation in federal cCourt for the Southern District of New York The Honorable Lisa M. Smith, Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Course Description A panel of sitting federal judges address a range of issues in awarding attorney fees and expenses in large, complex litigation in federal cCourt for the Southern District of New York Course Description A panel of sitting federal judges address a range of issues in awarding attorney fees and expenses in large, complex litigation in federal courtcourt.

Faculty The Honorable Milton I. Shadur, Senior Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois The Honorable William G. Young, District Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts The Honorable Victor A. Bolden, District Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut Course Description A panel of sitting federal judges address a range of issues in awarding attorney fees and expenses in large, complex litigation in federal cCourt for the Northern District of Illinois The Honorable William G. Young, District Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts The Honorable Victor A. Bolden, District Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut Course Description A panel of sitting federal judges address a range of issues in awarding attorney fees and expenses in large, complex litigation in federal cCourt for the District of Massachusetts The Honorable Victor A. Bolden, District Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut Course Description A panel of sitting federal judges address a range of issues in awarding attorney fees and expenses in large, complex litigation in federal cCourt for the District of Connecticut Course Description A panel of sitting federal judges address a range of issues in awarding attorney fees and expenses in large, complex litigation in federal courtcourt.

A recent decision issued by a federal district court in North Carolina challenges the familiar principle that in a borrower's bankruptcy, the lender, if it is oversecured as of the bankruptcy filing date, is entitled to receive post-petition interest, attorneys» fees and other charges arising post-petition to the extent of the value of its collateral.

In a decision released on June 26, 2015, a federal district court judge in Washington, D.C. ruled in favor of the Federal Trade Commission and issued a preliminary injunction blocking the consummation of the merger of Sfederal district court judge in Washington, D.C. ruled in favor of the Federal Trade Commission and issued a preliminary injunction blocking the consummation of the merger of SFederal Trade Commission and issued a preliminary injunction blocking the consummation of the merger of Sysco...

As Sam Bray argues, it logically requires (or at least permits and encourages) a district court to issue a universal injunction in every constitutional challenge to federal law.

The main issue is one that affects all federal sentencing appeals: how much deference should be given to district - court sentencing decisions, particularly for outside - the - Guidelines sentences?

And the related issue in Highmark v. Allcare Health Management Systems has to do with the standard of review the appellate court, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, must apply when reviewing the district court's decision to grant or deny the award of court, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, must apply when reviewing the district court's decision to grant or deny the award of Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, must apply when reviewing the district court's decision to grant or deny the award of court's decision to grant or deny the award of fees.

Issuing a directed verdict in favor of Hustler on the issue of invasion of privacy, a federal district court also ruled against Falwell on his libel claim because, the court said, no reasonable person would believe the situation depicted in the ad to be true.