Sentences with phrase «federal court cases arising»

the number of Federal court cases arising under the respective areas of law cited in the No FEAR Act where discrimination was alleged;

Not exact matches

The Federal Court of Appeal recently affirmed this approach to environmental regulation in a case arising out of Alberta called Syncrude Canada Ltd. v Canada (Attorney General).

(a) If Goods or Services are primarily being provided in the United States or any other location outside of Canada, any legal suit, action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be instituted in the federal courts of the United States of America or the courts of the State of New York in each case located within Erie County, New York, U.S.A. and each Party irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts in any such suit, action or proceeding.

By granting review of its third case in two years involving the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, the U.S. Supreme Court has signaled a renewed interest in resolving legal conflicts arising under the federal law that governs services provided to nearly 6.7 million schoolchildren in special education.

Any legal suit, action or proceeding arising out of, or related to, these Terms of Use or the Website shall be instituted exclusively in the federal courts of the United States or the courts of the State of California in each case located in the City of Irvine and County of Orange although we retain the right to bring any suit, action or proceeding against you for breach of these Terms of Use in your country of residence or any other relevant country.

When inevitable business disputes arise, we often recommend reaching negotiated settlements, however, we are fully prepared to litigate cases in the state and federal courts.

Our financial services litigators handle financial services class actions in federal and state courts; bad faith litigation; interpleader cases; trust litigation, escrow arrangements and garnishments; general contract disputes and alleged statutory violations; loan modifications, bad loans and other matters arising from lender - borrower relationships; bankruptcy litigation, including preference and fraudulent conveyance claims; and management of electronic data discovery in large, complex cases.

Won a defense verdict in a Mississippi Federal Court trial involving 15 deaths and 15 injuries arising out of a bus crash, in spite of the fact that sanctions imposed because of the conduct of the case before he was retained severely restricted the arguments the defense was allowed to make.

Attorney John R. Orton successfully mediated in Federal Court (Western District of Wisconsin) the resolution of a personal injury case arising under the Federal Tort Claim Act.

Seventh Circuit Rule 52 allows the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, when faced with «questions arising under the laws of [a] state which will control the outcome of a case pending in the federal court» to «certify such a question to the state court in accordance with the rules of that court» and to «stay the case... to await the state court's decision.&rCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, when faced with «questions arising under the laws of [a] state which will control the outcome of a case pending in the federal court» to «certify such a question to the state court in accordance with the rules of that court» and to «stay the case... to await the state court's decision.&rcourt» to «certify such a question to the state court in accordance with the rules of that court» and to «stay the case... to await the state court's decision.&rcourt in accordance with the rules of that court» and to «stay the case... to await the state court's decision.&rcourt» and to «stay the case... to await the state court's decision.&rcourt's decision.»

[13] Chief Justice James Allsop of the Federal Court of Australia summarised the ethical issues which arise as a result of the conflict the billable hours system creates between the economic pressure on a firm to maximise its profit and the ethical pressure on lawyers to work in their client's best interest: «Only a very slight change of focus needs to be made by a lawyer to change from (a) expecting a profitable return from running as well and efficiently as possible a large case in court, to (b) planning how to make as much money as possible from running the same large case in court.&rCourt of Australia summarised the ethical issues which arise as a result of the conflict the billable hours system creates between the economic pressure on a firm to maximise its profit and the ethical pressure on lawyers to work in their client's best interest: «Only a very slight change of focus needs to be made by a lawyer to change from (a) expecting a profitable return from running as well and efficiently as possible a large case in court, to (b) planning how to make as much money as possible from running the same large case in court.&rcourt, to (b) planning how to make as much money as possible from running the same large case in court.&rcourt.»

The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, and Turner appealed to the Eleventh Circuit (which has appellate jurisdiction over federal cases arising from Alabama, Georgia and Florida).

The case can not be removed to federal court, even though it arises under federal law.

If a claim arising under federal law is brought by a plaintiff in state court, and if the U.S. District Court would have jurisdiction over the claim if it were brought initially in the U.S. District Court (because, e.g., the defendant is not a state government), then a defendant in the state court case can remove the case to federal ccourt, and if the U.S. District Court would have jurisdiction over the claim if it were brought initially in the U.S. District Court (because, e.g., the defendant is not a state government), then a defendant in the state court case can remove the case to federal cCourt would have jurisdiction over the claim if it were brought initially in the U.S. District Court (because, e.g., the defendant is not a state government), then a defendant in the state court case can remove the case to federal cCourt (because, e.g., the defendant is not a state government), then a defendant in the state court case can remove the case to federal ccourt case can remove the case to federal courtcourt.

But, if a defendant brings a counterclaim arising under federal law in state court, the case can not be removed to federal court.

Baker Botts lawyers also handle district court litigation related to federal regulatory issues and appellate cases arising from review of both lower court decisions and agency orders.

In the U.S. Supreme Court Case of Jaffee v. Redmond, which arose from a clinical social worker's refusal to turn over case notes, the Court granted a broad federal privilege of privacy of communication between psychotherapists (including clinical social workers) and their clieCase of Jaffee v. Redmond, which arose from a clinical social worker's refusal to turn over case notes, the Court granted a broad federal privilege of privacy of communication between psychotherapists (including clinical social workers) and their cliecase notes, the Court granted a broad federal privilege of privacy of communication between psychotherapists (including clinical social workers) and their clients.